Mondo/ChREBP-Mlx-Regulated Transcriptional Network Is Essential for Dietary Sugar Tolerance in

English version České info

Sugars are important nutrients for many animals, but are also proposed to contribute to overnutrition-derived metabolic diseases in humans. Understanding the genetic factors governing dietary sugar tolerance therefore has profound biological and medical significance. Paralogous Mondo transcription factors ChREBP and MondoA, with their common binding partner Mlx, are key sensors of intracellular glucose flux in mammals. Here we report analysis of the in vivo function of Drosophila melanogaster Mlx and its binding partner Mondo (ChREBP) in respect to tolerance to dietary sugars. Larvae lacking mlx or having reduced mondo expression show strikingly reduced survival on a diet with moderate or high levels of sucrose, glucose, and fructose. mlx null mutants display widespread changes in lipid and phospholipid profiles, signs of amino acid catabolism, as well as strongly elevated circulating glucose levels. Systematic loss-of-function analysis of Mlx target genes reveals that circulating glucose levels and dietary sugar tolerance can be genetically uncoupled: Krüppel-like transcription factor Cabut and carbonyl detoxifying enzyme Aldehyde dehydrogenase type III are essential for dietary sugar tolerance, but display no influence on circulating glucose levels. On the other hand, Phosphofructokinase 2, a regulator of the glycolysis pathway, is needed for both dietary sugar tolerance and maintenance of circulating glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, we show evidence that fatty acid synthesis, which is a highly conserved Mondo-Mlx-regulated process, does not promote dietary sugar tolerance. In contrast, survival of larvae with reduced fatty acid synthase expression is sugar-dependent. Our data demonstrate that the transcriptional network regulated by Mondo-Mlx is a critical determinant of the healthful dietary spectrum allowing Drosophila to exploit sugar-rich nutrient sources.

Vyšlo v časopise: Mondo/ChREBP-Mlx-Regulated Transcriptional Network Is Essential for Dietary Sugar Tolerance in. PLoS Genet 9(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003438
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003438

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. TsaharE, del RioCM, AradZ, JoyJP, IzhakiI (2005) Are the low protein requirements of nectarivorous birds the consequence of their sugary and watery diet? A test with an omnivore. Physiol Biochem Zool 78: 239–245.

2. WelchKCJr, SuarezRK (2007) Oxidation rate and turnover of ingested sugar in hovering Anna's (Calypte anna) and rufous (Selasphorus rufus) hummingbirds. J Exp Biol 210: 2154–2162.

3. LustigRH, SchmidtLA, BrindisCD (2012) Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482: 27–29.

4. TappyL, LeKA, TranC, PaquotN (2010) Fructose and metabolic diseases: new findings, new questions. Nutrition 26: 1044–1049.

5. StanhopeKL (2012) Role of fructose-containing sugars in the epidemics of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Annu Rev Med 63: 329–343.

6. MatzkinLM, JohnsonS, PaightC, BozinovicG, MarkowTA (2011) Dietary protein and sugar differentially affect development and metabolic pools in ecologically diverse Drosophila. J Nutr 141: 1127–1133.

7. MusselmanLP, FinkJL, NarzinskiK, RamachandranPV, HathiramaniSS, et al. (2011) A high-sugar diet produces obesity and insulin resistance in wild-type Drosophila. Dis Model Mech 4: 842–849.

8. PascoMY, LeopoldP (2012) High sugar-induced insulin resistance in Drosophila relies on the lipocalin Neural Lazarillo. PLoS ONE 7: e36583 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036583.

9. MairW, PiperMD, PartridgeL (2005) Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 3: e223 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223.

10. ZinkeI, SchutzCS, KatzenbergerJD, BauerM, PankratzMJ (2002) Nutrient control of gene expression in Drosophila: microarray analysis of starvation and sugar-dependent response. EMBO J 21: 6162–6173.

11. GiaccariA, SoriceG, MuscogiuriG (2009) Glucose toxicity: the leading actor in the pathogenesis and clinical history of type 2 diabetes - mechanisms and potentials for treatment. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 19: 365–377.

12. SinghDK, WinocourP, FarringtonK (2011) Oxidative stress in early diabetic nephropathy: fueling the fire. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7: 176–184.

13. SaltielAR, KahnCR (2001) Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414: 799–806.

14. HavulaE, HietakangasV (2012) Glucose sensing by ChREBP/MondoA-Mlx transcription factors. Semin Cell Dev Biol

15. MaL, RobinsonLN, TowleHC (2006) ChREBP*Mlx is the principal mediator of glucose-induced gene expression in the liver. J Biol Chem 281: 28721–28730.

16. StoltzmanCA, PetersonCW, BreenKT, MuoioDM, BillinAN, et al. (2008) Glucose sensing by MondoA:Mlx complexes: a role for hexokinases and direct regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 6912–6917.

17. LiMV, ChenW, HarmanceyRN, Nuotio-AntarAM, ImamuraM, et al. (2010) Glucose-6-phosphate mediates activation of the carbohydrate responsive binding protein (ChREBP). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 395: 395–400.

18. DentinR, Tomas-CobosL, FoufelleF, LeopoldJ, GirardJ, et al. (2012) Glucose 6-phosphate, rather than xylulose 5-phosphate, is required for the activation of ChREBP in response to glucose in the liver. J Hepatol 56: 199–209.

19. StoltzmanCA, KaadigeMR, PetersonCW, AyerDE (2011) MondoA senses non-glucose sugars: regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the hexose transport curb. J Biol Chem 286: 38027–38034.

20. SansCL, SatterwhiteDJ, StoltzmanCA, BreenKT, AyerDE (2006) MondoA-Mlx heterodimers are candidate sensors of cellular energy status: mitochondrial localization and direct regulation of glycolysis. Mol Cell Biol 26: 4863–4871.

21. JeongYS, KimD, LeeYS, KimHJ, HanJY, et al. (2011) Integrated expression profiling and genome-wide analysis of ChREBP targets reveals the dual role for ChREBP in glucose-regulated gene expression. PLoS ONE 6: e22544 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022544.

22. YamashitaH, TakenoshitaM, SakuraiM, BruickRK, HenzelWJ, et al. (2001) A glucose-responsive transcription factor that regulates carbohydrate metabolism in the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 9116–9121.

23. WangH, WollheimCB (2002) ChREBP rather than USF2 regulates glucose stimulation of endogenous L-pyruvate kinase expression in insulin-secreting cells. J Biol Chem 277: 32746–32752.

24. HeZ, JiangT, WangZ, LeviM, LiJ (2004) Modulation of carbohydrate response element-binding protein gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and rat adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287: E424–430.

25. IizukaK, BruickRK, LiangG, HortonJD, UyedaK (2004) Deficiency of carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) reduces lipogenesis as well as glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 7281–7286.

26. DentinR, BenhamedF, HainaultI, FauveauV, FoufelleF, et al. (2006) Liver-specific inhibition of ChREBP improves hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in ob/ob mice. Diabetes 55: 2159–2170.

27. BillinAN, EilersAL, CoulterKL, LoganJS, AyerDE (2000) MondoA, a novel basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper transcriptional activator that constitutes a positive branch of a max-like network. Mol Cell Biol 20: 8845–8854.

28. HermanMA, PeroniOD, VilloriaJ, SchonMR, AbumradNA, et al. (2012) A novel ChREBP isoform in adipose tissue regulates systemic glucose metabolism. Nature 484: 333–338.

29. PeyrefitteS, KahnD, HaenlinM (2001) New members of the Drosophila Myc transcription factor subfamily revealed by a genome-wide examination for basic helix-loop-helix genes. Mech Dev 104: 99–104.

30. McFerrinLG, AtchleyWR (2011) Evolution of the Max and Mlx networks in animals. Genome Biol Evol 3: 915–937.

31. BeckerA, SchloderP, SteeleJE, WegenerG (1996) The regulation of trehalose metabolism in insects. Experientia 52: 433–439.

32. IshiiS, IizukaK, MillerBC, UyedaK (2004) Carbohydrate response element binding protein directly promotes lipogenic enzyme gene transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 15597–15602.

33. SassuED, McDermottJE, KeysBJ, EsmaeiliM, KeeneAC, et al. (2012) Mio/dChREBP coordinately increases fat mass by regulating lipid synthesis and feeding behavior in Drosophila. Biochem Biophys Res Commun

34. SinghS, BrockerC, KoppakaV, ChenY, JacksonBC, et al. (2012) Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cellular responses to oxidative/electrophilic stress. Free Radic Biol Med 56C: 89–101.

35. TownsendAJ, Leone-KablerS, HaynesRL, WuY, SzwedaL, et al. (2001) Selective protection by stably transfected human ALDH3A1 (but not human ALDH1A1) against toxicity of aliphatic aldehydes in V79 cells. Chem Biol Interact 130–132: 261–273.

36. PappaA, ChenC, KoutalosY, TownsendAJ, VasiliouV (2003) Aldh3a1 protects human corneal epithelial cells from ultraviolet- and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-induced oxidative damage. Free Radic Biol Med 34: 1178–1189.

37. LassenN, PappaA, BlackWJ, JesterJV, DayBJ, et al. (2006) Antioxidant function of corneal ALDH3A1 in cultured stromal fibroblasts. Free Radic Biol Med 41: 1459–1469.

38. YuHS, OyamaT, IsseT, KitakawaK, OgawaM, et al. (2009) Characteristics of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Aldh2) knockout mice. Toxicol Mech Methods 19: 535–540.

39. CrabbDW, EdenbergHJ, BosronWF, LiTK (1989) Genotypes for aldehyde dehydrogenase deficiency and alcohol sensitivity. The inactive ALDH2(2) allele is dominant. J Clin Invest 83: 314–316.

40. YalcinA, TelangS, ClemB, ChesneyJ (2009) Regulation of glucose metabolism by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer. Exp Mol Pathol 86: 174–179.

41. DeprezJ, VertommenD, AlessiDR, HueL, RiderMH (1997) Phosphorylation and activation of heart 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase by protein kinase B and other protein kinases of the insulin signaling cascades. J Biol Chem 272: 17269–17275.

42. MoutonV, ToussaintL, VertommenD, GueuningMA, MaisinL, et al. (2010) Heart 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activation by insulin requires PKB (protein kinase B), but not SGK3 (serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 3). Biochem J 431: 267–275.

43. GuertinDA, GunturKV, BellGW, ThoreenCC, SabatiniDM (2006) Functional genomics identifies TOR-regulated genes that control growth and division. Curr Biol 16: 958–970.

44. BulowMH, AebersoldR, PankratzMJ, JungerMA (2010) The Drosophila FoxA ortholog Fork head regulates growth and gene expression downstream of Target of rapamycin. PLoS ONE 5: e15171 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015171.

45. Munoz-DescalzoS, TerolJ, ParicioN (2005) Cabut, a C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor, is required during Drosophila dorsal closure downstream of JNK signaling. Dev Biol 287: 168–179.

46. RodriguezI (2011) Drosophila TIEG is a modulator of different signalling pathways involved in wing patterning and cell proliferation. PLoS ONE 6: e18418 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018418.

47. NeveB, Fernandez-ZapicoME, Ashkenazi-KatalanV, DinaC, HamidYH, et al. (2005) Role of transcription factor KLF11 and its diabetes-associated gene variants in pancreatic beta cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4807–4812.

48. IizukaK, TakedaJ, HorikawaY (2011) Kruppel-like factor-10 is directly regulated by carbohydrate response element-binding protein in rat primary hepatocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 412: 638–643.

49. GuillaumondF, Grechez-CassiauA, SubramaniamM, BrangoloS, Peteri-BrunbackB, et al. (2010) Kruppel-like factor KLF10 is a link between the circadian clock and metabolism in liver. Mol Cell Biol 30: 3059–3070.

50. BouteldjaN, TimsonDJ (2010) The biochemical basis of hereditary fructose intolerance. J Inherit Metab Dis 33: 105–112.

51. LeeT, LuoL (1999) Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22: 451–461.

52. ZinkeI, KirchnerC, ChaoLC, TetzlaffMT, PankratzMJ (1999) Suppression of food intake and growth by amino acids in Drosophila: the role of pumpless, a fat body expressed gene with homology to vertebrate glycine cleavage system. Development 126: 5275–5284.

53. LeeG, ParkJH (2004) Hemolymph sugar homeostasis and starvation-induced hyperactivity affected by genetic manipulations of the adipokinetic hormone-encoding gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 311–323.

54. LuoL, LiaoYJ, JanLY, JanYN (1994) Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: Drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev 8: 1787–1802.

55. RanganayakuluG, ElliottDA, HarveyRP, OlsonEN (1998) Divergent roles for NK-2 class homeobox genes in cardiogenesis in flies and mice. Development 125: 3037–3048.

56. CastilloS, MattilaI, MiettinenJ, OresicM, HyotylainenT (2011) Data analysis tool for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 83: 3058–3067.

57. PluskalT, CastilloS, Villar-BrionesA, OresicM (2010) MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 395.

58. ZhangW, ThompsonBJ, HietakangasV, CohenSM (2011) MAPK/ERK signaling regulates insulin sensitivity to control glucose metabolism in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 7: e1002429 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002429.

59. ParrouJL, FrancoisJ (1997) A simplified procedure for a rapid and reliable assay of both glycogen and trehalose in whole yeast cells. Anal Biochem 248: 186–188.