Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends on the establishment of a crossover between homologous chromosomes. This requires induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), alignment of homologs, homolog association by synapsis, and repair of DSBs via homologous recombination. The success of these events requires coordination between chromosomal events and meiotic progression. The conserved SUN/KASH nuclear envelope bridge establishes transient linkages between chromosome ends and cytoskeletal forces during meiosis. In Caenorhabditis elegans, this bridge is essential for bringing homologs together and preventing nonhomologous synapsis. Chromosome movement takes place during synapsis and recombination. Concomitant with the onset of chromosome movement, SUN-1 clusters at chromosome ends associated with the nuclear envelope, and it is phosphorylated in a chk-2- and plk-2-dependent manner. Identification of all SUN-1 phosphomodifications at its nuclear N terminus allowed us to address their role in prophase I. Failures in recombination and synapsis led to persistent phosphorylations, which are required to elicit a delay in progression. Unfinished meiotic tasks elicited sustained recruitment of PLK-2 to chromosome ends in a SUN-1 phosphorylation–dependent manner that is required for continued chromosome movement and characteristic of a zygotene arrest. Furthermore, SUN-1 phosphorylation supported efficient synapsis. We propose that signals emanating from a failure to successfully finish meiotic tasks are integrated at the nuclear periphery to regulate chromosome end–led movement and meiotic progression. The single unsynapsed X chromosome in male meiosis is precluded from inducing a progression delay, and we found it was devoid of a population of phosphorylated SUN-1. This suggests that SUN-1 phosphorylation is critical to delaying meiosis in response to perturbed synapsis. SUN-1 may be an integral part of a checkpoint system to monitor establishment of the obligate crossover, inducible only in leptotene/zygotene. Unrepaired DSBs and unsynapsed chromosomes maintain this checkpoint, but a crossover intermediate is necessary to shut it down.
Vyšlo v časopise: Matefin/SUN-1 Phosphorylation Is Part of a Surveillance Mechanism to Coordinate Chromosome Synapsis and Recombination with Meiotic Progression and Chromosome Movement. PLoS Genet 9(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003335 Kategorie: Research Article prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003335
1. YanowitzJ (2010) Meiosis: making a break for it. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22 (6)
744–51.
2. CrittendenSL, et al. (2006) Cellular analyses of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabditis elegans adult germ line. Molecular biology of the cell 17 (7)
3051–61.
3. HermanRK, KariCK (1989) Recombination between small X chromosome duplications and the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 121 (4)
723–37.
4. McKimKS, HowellAM, RoseAM (1988) The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 120 (4)
987–1001.
5. RosenbluthRE, BaillieDL (1981) The genetic analysis of a reciprocal translocation, eT1(III; V), in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 99 (3–4)
415–28.
6. VilleneuveAM (1994) A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136 (3)
887–902.
7. MacQueenAJ, et al. (2005) Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 123 (6)
1037–50.
8. PhillipsCM, DernburgAF (2006) A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Dev Cell 11 (6)
817–29.
9. PhillipsCM, et al. (2009) Identification of chromosome sequence motifs that mediate meiotic pairing and synapsis in C. elegans. Nat Cell Biol 11 (8)
934–42.
10. PhillipsCM, et al. (2005) HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123 (6)
1051–63.
11. LabellaS, et al. (2011) Polo kinases establish links between meiotic chromosomes and cytoskeletal forces essential for homolog pairing. Dev Cell 21 (5)
948–58.
12. HarperNC, et al. (2011) Pairing centers recruit a Polo-like kinase to orchestrate meiotic chromosome dynamics in C. elegans. Dev Cell 21 (5)
934–47.
13. SatoA, et al. (2009) Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 139 (5)
907–19.
14. PenknerAM, et al. (2009) Meiotic chromosome homology search involves modifications of the nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1. Cell 139 (5)
920–33.
15. PenknerA, et al. (2007) The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 12 (6)
873–85.
16. KoszulR, KlecknerN (2009) Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections? Trends Cell Biol 19 (12)
716–24.
17. ScherthanH (2001) A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2 (8)
621–7.
18. WynneDJ, et al. (2012) Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. J Cell Biol 196 (1)
47–64.
19. BurkeB (2012) It Takes KASH to Hitch to the SUN. Cell 149 (5)
961–3.
20. FridkinA, et al. (2009) SUN-domain and KASH-domain proteins during development, meiosis and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 66 (9)
1518–33.
21. MacQueenAJ, et al. (2002) Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev 16 (18)
2428–42.
22. MetsDG, MeyerBJ (2009) Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 139 (1)
73–86.
23. AlpiA, et al. (2003) Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 112 (1)
6–16.
24. ColaiacovoMP, et al. (2003) Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell 5 (3)
463–74.
25. MacQueenAJ, HochwagenA (2011) Checkpoint mechanisms: the puppet masters of meiotic prophase. Trends Cell Biol 21 (7)
393–400.
26. GartnerA, et al. (2000) A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage–induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol Cell 5 (3)
435–43.
27. Jaramillo-LambertA, et al. (2010) Meiotic errors activate checkpoints that improve gamete quality without triggering apoptosis in male germ cells. Curr Biol 20 (23)
2078–89.
28. Jaramillo-LambertA, EngebrechtJ (2010) A single unpaired and transcriptionally silenced X chromosome locally precludes checkpoint signaling in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Genetics 184 (3)
613–28.
29. BhallaN, DernburgAF (2005) A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 310 (5754)
1683–6.
30. BaudrimontA, PenknerA, WoglarA, MachacekT, WegrostekC, et al. (2010) Leptotene/Zygotene Chromosome Movement Via the SUN/KASH Protein Bridge in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 6: e1001219 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001219.
31. GumiennyTL, et al. (1999) Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development 126 (5)
1011–22.
32. ZhaoH, Piwnica-WormsH (2001) ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Molecular and cellular biology 21 (13)
4129–39.
33. RinaldoC, et al. (2002) Roles for Caenorhabditis elegans rad-51 in meiosis and in resistance to ionizing radiation during development. Genetics 160 (2)
471–9.
34. DernburgAF, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94 (3)
387–98.
35. Frokjaer-JensenC, et al. (2008) Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature genetics 40 (11)
1375–83.
36. CouteauF, et al. (2004) A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Current biology: CB 14 (7)
585–92.
37. MacQueenAJ, VilleneuveAM (2001) Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes & development 15 (13)
1674–87.
38. GoodyerW, et al. (2008) HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis. Developmental cell 14 (2)
263–74.
39. Martinez-PerezE, et al. (2008) Crossovers trigger a remodeling of meiotic chromosome axis composition that is linked to two-step loss of sister chromatid cohesion. Genes & development 22 (20)
2886–901.
40. KosakaH, ShinoharaM, ShinoharaA (2008) Csm4-Dependent Telomere Movement on Nuclear Envelope Promotes Meiotic Recombination. PLoS Genet 4 (9)
e1000196 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000196.
41. KellyWG, et al. (2002) X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129 (2)
479–92.
42. MarangosP, CarrollJ (2012) Oocytes Progress beyond Prophase in the Presence of DNA Damage. Current biology: CB 22 (11)
989–94.
43. LeiK, et al. (2012) Inner Nuclear Envelope Proteins SUN1 and SUN2 Play a Prominent Role in the DNA Damage Response. Current biology: CB 22 (17)
1609–15.
44. DingX, et al. (2007) SUN1 is required for telomere attachment to nuclear envelope and gametogenesis in mice. Developmental cell 12 (6)
863–72.
45. SchmittJ, et al. (2007) Transmembrane protein Sun2 is involved in tethering mammalian meiotic telomeres to the nuclear envelope. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (18)
7426–31.
46. BrennerS (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77 (1)
71–94.
47. EllisHM, HorvitzHR (1986) Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell 44 (6)
48. KamathRS, et al. (2001) Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome biology 2 (1)
RESEARCH0002.
Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte sa
Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
