#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Role of Tomato Lipoxygenase D in Wound-Induced Jasmonate Biosynthesis and Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores


In response to insect attack and mechanical wounding, plants activate the expression of genes involved in various defense-related processes. A fascinating feature of these inducible defenses is their occurrence both locally at the wounding site and systemically in undamaged leaves throughout the plant. Wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors (PIs) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) provide an attractive model to understand the signal transduction events leading from localized injury to the systemic expression of defense-related genes. Among the identified intercellular molecules in regulating systemic wound response of tomato are the peptide signal systemin and the oxylipin signal jasmonic acid (JA). The systemin/JA signaling pathway provides a unique opportunity to investigate, in a single experimental system, the mechanism by which peptide and oxylipin signals interact to coordinate plant systemic immunity. Here we describe the characterization of the tomato suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses8 (spr8) mutant, which was isolated as a suppressor of (pro)systemin-mediated signaling. spr8 plants exhibit a series of JA-dependent immune deficiencies, including the inability to express wound-responsive genes, abnormal development of glandular trichomes, and severely compromised resistance to cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and Botrytis cinerea. Map-based cloning studies demonstrate that the spr8 mutant phenotype results from a point mutation in the catalytic domain of TomLoxD, a chloroplast-localized lipoxygenase involved in JA biosynthesis. We present evidence that overexpression of TomLoxD leads to elevated wound-induced JA biosynthesis, increased expression of wound-responsive genes and, therefore, enhanced resistance to insect herbivory attack and necrotrophic pathogen infection. These results indicate that TomLoxD is involved in wound-induced JA biosynthesis and highlight the application potential of this gene for crop protection against insects and pathogens.


Vyšlo v časopise: Role of Tomato Lipoxygenase D in Wound-Induced Jasmonate Biosynthesis and Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores. PLoS Genet 9(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003964
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003964

Souhrn

In response to insect attack and mechanical wounding, plants activate the expression of genes involved in various defense-related processes. A fascinating feature of these inducible defenses is their occurrence both locally at the wounding site and systemically in undamaged leaves throughout the plant. Wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors (PIs) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) provide an attractive model to understand the signal transduction events leading from localized injury to the systemic expression of defense-related genes. Among the identified intercellular molecules in regulating systemic wound response of tomato are the peptide signal systemin and the oxylipin signal jasmonic acid (JA). The systemin/JA signaling pathway provides a unique opportunity to investigate, in a single experimental system, the mechanism by which peptide and oxylipin signals interact to coordinate plant systemic immunity. Here we describe the characterization of the tomato suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses8 (spr8) mutant, which was isolated as a suppressor of (pro)systemin-mediated signaling. spr8 plants exhibit a series of JA-dependent immune deficiencies, including the inability to express wound-responsive genes, abnormal development of glandular trichomes, and severely compromised resistance to cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and Botrytis cinerea. Map-based cloning studies demonstrate that the spr8 mutant phenotype results from a point mutation in the catalytic domain of TomLoxD, a chloroplast-localized lipoxygenase involved in JA biosynthesis. We present evidence that overexpression of TomLoxD leads to elevated wound-induced JA biosynthesis, increased expression of wound-responsive genes and, therefore, enhanced resistance to insect herbivory attack and necrotrophic pathogen infection. These results indicate that TomLoxD is involved in wound-induced JA biosynthesis and highlight the application potential of this gene for crop protection against insects and pathogens.


Zdroje

1. RyanCA (2000) The systemin signaling pathway: differential activation of plant defensive genes. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1477: 112–121.

2. WallingLL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regulation 19: 195–216.

3. LiL, LiC, LeeGI, HoweGA (2002) Distinct roles for jasmonate synthesis and action in the systemic wound response of tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6416–6421.

4. HoweGA, JanderG (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 41–66.

5. WuJ, BaldwinIT (2010) New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annu Rev Genet 44: 1–24.

6. DickeM, BaldwinIT (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the “cry for help”. Trends Plant Sci 15: 167–175.

7. SunJ, JiangH, LiC (2011) Systemin/jasmonate-mediated systemic defense signaling in tomato. Mol Plant 4: 607–615.

8. SchilmillerAL, HoweGA (2005) Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 369–377.

9. RyanCA, PearceG (1998) Systemin: a polypeptide signal for plant defensive genes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Bio 14: 1–17.

10. GreenTR, RyanCA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insets. Science 175: 776–777.

11. RyanCA (1967) Quantitative determination of soluble cellular proteins by radial diffusion in agar gels containing antibodies. Anal Biochem 19: 434–440.

12. PearceG, StrydomD, JohnsonS, RyanCA (1991) A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science 253: 895–897.

13. RyanCA (1992) The search for the proteinase inhibitor-inducing factor, PIIF. Plant Mol Biol 19: 123–133.

14. McGurlB, RyanCA (1992) The organization of the prosystemin gene. Plant Mol Biol 20: 405–409.

15. McGurlB, Orozco-CardenasM, PearceG, RyanCA (1994) Overexpression of the prosystemin gene in transgenic tomato plants generates a systemic signal that constitutively induces proteinase inhibitor synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 9799–9802.

16. ChenH, WilkersonCG, KucharJA, PhinneyBS, HoweGA (2005) Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 19237–19242.

17. HoweGA, RyanCA (1999) Suppressors of systemin signaling identify genes in the tomato wound response pathway. Genetics 153: 1411–1421.

18. LiC, LiuG, XuC, LeeI, BauerP, et al. (2003) The tomato suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses2 gene encodes a fatty acid desaturase required for the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid and the production of a systemic wound signal for defense gene expression. Plant Cell 15: 1646–1661.

19. VickBA, ZimmermanDC (1984) Biosynthesis of jasmonic acid by several plant species. Plant physiol 75: 458–461.

20. FarmerEE, RyanCA (1992) Octadecanoid precursors of jasmonic acid activate the synthesis of wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors. Plant Cell 4: 129–134.

21. SchallerF (2001) Enzymes of the biosynthesis of octadecanoid-derived signalling molecules. J Exp Bot 52: 11–23.

22. FarmerEE, RyanCA (1990) Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7713–7716.

23. DevotoA, TurnerJG (2003) Regulation of jasmonate-mediated plant responses in Arabidopsis. Ann Bot 92: 329–337.

24. BrowseJ (2005) Jasmonate: an oxylipin signal with many roles in plants. Vitam Horm 72: 431–456.

25. WasternackC (2007) Jasmonates: an update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann Bot 100: 681–697.

26. WasternackC, HauseB (2013) Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot 111: 1021–1058.

27. BalbiV, DevotoA (2008) Jasmonate signalling network in Arabidopsis thaliana: crucial regulatory nodes and new physiological scenarios. New Phytol 177: 301–318.

28. LeeGI, HoweGA (2003) The tomato mutant spr1 is defective in systemin perception and the production of a systemic wound signal for defense gene expression. Plant J 33: 567–576.

29. LiC, ZhaoJ, JiangH, WuX, SunJ, et al. (2006) The wound response mutant suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses6 (spr6) is a weak allele of the tomato homolog of CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE1 (COI1). Plant Cell Physiol 47: 653–663.

30. YanJ, ZhangC, GuM, BaiZ, ZhangW, et al. (2009) The Arabidopsis CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 protein is a jasmonate receptor. Plant Cell 21: 2220–2236.

31. RyanCA, MouraDS (2002) Systemic wound signaling in plants: a new perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6519–6520.

32. StratmannJW (2003) Long distance run in the wound response - jasmonic acid is pulling ahead. Trends Plant Sci 8: 247–250.

33. StenzelI, HauseB, MaucherH, PitzschkeA, MierschO, et al. (2003) Allene oxide cyclase dependence of the wound response and vascular bundle-specific generation of jasmonates in tomato - amplification in wound signalling. Plant J 33: 577–589.

34. PearceG, RyanCA (2003) Systemic signaling in tomato plants for defense against herbivores: Isolation and characterization of three novel defense-signaling glycopeptide hormones coded in a single precursor gene. J Biol Chem 278: 30044–30050.

35. Narváez-VásquezJ, Orozco-CárdenasML, RyanCA (2007) Systemic wound signaling in tomato leaves is cooperatively regulated by systemin and hydroxyproline-rich glycopeptide signals. Plant Mol Biol 65: 711–718.

36. TrautmanR, CowanKM, WagnerCG (1971) Data processing for radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry 8: 901–916.

37. JohnsonR, NarvaezJ, AnG, RyanCA (1989) Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: Effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 9871–9875.

38. FowlerJH, Narváez-VásquezJ, AromdeeDN, PautotV, HolzerFM, et al. (2009) Leucine aminopeptidase regulates defense and wound signaling in tomato downstream of jasmonic acid. Plant Cell 21: 1239–1251.

39. WagnerGJ (1991) Secreting glandular trichomes: more than just hairs. Plant physiol 96: 675–679.

40. WilkensRT, SheaGO, HalbreichS, StampNE (1996) Resource availability and the trichome defenses of tomato plants. Oecologia 106: 181–191.

41. HareJD (2005) Biological activity of acyl glucose esters from Datura wrightii glandular trichomes against three native insect herbivores. J Chem Ecol 31: 1475–1491.

42. Luckwill LC (1943) The genus Lycopersicon: historical, biological, and taxonomic survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes. (Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen University Press).

43. SchilmillerAL, SchauvinholdI, LarsonM, XuR, CharbonneauAL, et al. (2009) Monoterpenes in the glandular trichomes of tomato are synthesized from a neryl diphosphate precursor rather than geranyl diphosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 10865–10870.

44. The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485: 635–641.

45. RenJ, LiC, LiC (2012) Tomato genome gets fully decoded – paves way to tastier and healthier fruits. J Genet Genomics 39: 303–305.

46. HeitzT, BergeyDR, RyanCA (1997) A gene encoding a chloroplast-targeted lipoxygenase in tomato leaves is transiently induced by wounding, systemin, and methyl jasmonate. Plant physiol 114: 1085–1093.

47. FeussnerI, WasternackC (2002) The lipoxygenase pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53: 275–297.

48. AndreouA, FeussnerI (2009) Lipoxygenases - structure and reaction mechanism. Phytochemistry 70: 1504–1510.

49. CaldelariD, WangG, FarmerEE, DongX (2011) Arabidopsis lox3 lox4 double mutants are male sterile and defective in global proliferative arrest. Plant Mol Biol 75: 25–33.

50. ChenR, JiangH, LiL, ZhaiQ, QiL, et al. (2012) The Arabidopsis mediator subunit MED25 differentially regulates jasmonate and abscisic acid signaling through interacting with the MYC2 and ABI5 transcription factors. Plant Cell 24: 2898–2916.

51. ZhaiQ, YanL, TanD, ChenR, SunJ, et al. (2013) Phosphorylation-coupled proteolysis of the transcription factor MYC2 is important for jasmonate-signaled plant immunity. PLoS Genet 9: e1003422.

52. BoterM, Ruíz-RiveroO, AbdeenA, PratS (2004) Conserved MYC transcription factors play a key role in jasmonate signaling both in tomato and Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18: 1577–1591.

53. LorenzoO, ChicoJM, Sánchez-SerranoJJ, SolanoR (2004) JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16: 1938–1950.

54. ChenQ, SunJ, ZhaiQ, ZhouW, QiL, et al. (2011) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MYC2 directly represses PLETHORA expression during jasmonate-mediated modulation of the root stem cell niche in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23: 3335–3352.

55. HouX, LeeLY, XiaK, YanY, YuH (2010) DELLAs modulate jasmonate signaling via competitive binding to JAZs. Dev Cell 19: 884–894.

56. Glazebrook (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43: 205–227.

57. El OirdiM, BouarabK (2007) Plant signalling components EDS1 and SGT1 enhance disease caused by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. New Phytol 175: 131–139.

58. El OirdiM, El RahmanTA, RiganoL, El HadramiA, RodriguezMC, et al. (2011) Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato. Plant Cell 23: 2405–2421.

59. AhnIP, LeeSW, KimMG, ParkSR, HwangDJ, et al. (2011) Priming by rhizobacterium protects tomato plants from biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogen infections through multiple defense mechanisms. Mol Cells 32: 7–14.

60. FerrieBJ, BeaudoinN, BurkhartW, BowsherCG, RothsteinSJ (1994) The cloning of two tomato lipoxygenase genes and their differential expression during fruit ripening. Plant physiol 106: 109–118.

61. GriffithsA, BarryC, Alpuche-SolisAG, GriersonD (1999) Ethylene and developmental signals regulate expression of lipoxygenase genes during tomato fruit ripening. J Exp Bot 50: 793–798.

62. GriffithsA, PrestageS, LinforthR, ZhangJ, TaylorA, et al. (1999) Fruit-specific lipoxygenase suppression in antisense-transgenic tomatoes. Postharvest Biol Technol 17: 163–173.

63. ChenG, HackettR, WalkerD, TaylorA, LinZ, et al. (2004) Identification of a specific isoform of tomato lipoxygenase (TomloxC) involved in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavor compounds. Plant Physiol 136: 2641–2651.

64. MariuttoM, DubyF, AdamA, BureauC, FauconnierM-L, et al. (2011) The elicitation of a systemic resistance by Pseudomonas putida BTP1 in tomato involves the stimulation of two lipoxygenase isoforms. BMC Plant Bio 11: 29.

65. BannenbergG, MartínezM, HambergM, CastresanaC (2009) Diversity of the enzymatic activity in the lipoxygenase gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Lipids 44: 85–95.

66. BellE, CreelmanRA, MulletJE (1995) A chloroplast lipoxygenase is required for wound-induced jasmonic acid accumulation in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 8675–8679.

67. GlauserG, DubugnonL, MousaviSA, RudazS, WolfenderJ-L, et al. (2009) Velocity estimates for signal propagation leading to systemic jasmonic acid accumulation in wounded Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 284: 34506–34513.

68. AcostaIF, LaparraH, RomeroSP, SchmelzE, HambergM, et al. (2009) tasselseed1 is a lipoxygenase affecting jasmonic acid signaling in sex determination of maize. Science 323: 262–265.

69. BergeyDR, HoweGA, RyanCA (1996) Polypeptide signaling for plant defensive genes exhibits analogies to defense signaling in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 12053–12058.

70. ChenH, JonesAD, HoweGA (2006) Constitutive activation of the jasmonate signaling pathway enhances the production of secondary metabolites in tomato. FEBS Lett 580: 2540–2546.

71. SeoS, SanoH, OhashiY (1999) Jasmonate-based wound signal transduction requires activation of WIPK, a tobacco mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell 11: 289–298.

72. EllisC, TurnerJG (2001) The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 has constitutively active jasmonate and ethylene signal pathways and enhanced resistance to pathogens. Plant Cell 13: 1025–1033.

73. EllisC, KarafyllidisI, WasternackC, TurnerJG (2002) The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses. Plant Cell 14: 1557–1566.

74. LaudertD, SchallerF, WeilerEW (2000) Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana plants overexpressing allene oxide synthase. Planta 211: 163–165.

75. SchallerF, SchallerA, StintziA (2005) Biosynthesis and metabolism of jasmonates. J Plant Growth Regul 23: 179–199.

76. SchallerA, StintziA (2009) Enzymes in jasmonate biosynthesis - structure, function, regulation. Phytochemistry 70: 1532–1538.

77. BostockRM (2005) Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43: 545–580.

78. CreelmanRA, MulletJE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 355–381.

79. LiC, SchilmillerAL, LiuG, LeeGI, JayantyS, et al. (2005) Role of β-oxidation in jasmonate biosynthesis and systemic wound signaling in tomato. Plant Cell 17: 971–986.

80. LiL, HoweGA (2001) Alternative splicing of prosystemin pre-mRNA produces two isoforms that are active as signals in the wound response pathway. Plant Mol Biol 46: 409–419.

81. LiL, ZhaoY, MccaigBC, WingerdBA, WangJ, et al. (2004) The tomato homolog of CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE1 is required for the maternal control of seed maturation, jasmonate-signaled defense responses, and glandular trichome development. Plant Cell 16: 126–143.

82. AltschulSF, MaddenTL, SchäfferAA, ZhangJ, ZhangZ, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.

83. RonquistF, HuelsenbeckJP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.

84. FuJ, ChuJ, SunX, WangJ, YanC (2012) Simple, rapid, and simultaneous assay of multiple carboxyl containing phytohormones in wounded tomatoes by UPLC-MS/MS using single SPE purification and isotope dilution. Anal Sci 28: 1081–1087.

85. GendrelA-V, LippmanZ, MartienssenR, ColotV (2005) Profiling histone modification patterns in plants using genomic tiling microarrays. Nature methods 2: 213–218.

86. KostB, SpielhoferP, ChuaNH (1998) A GFP-mouse talin fusion protein labels plant actin filaments in vivo and visualizes the actin cytoskeleton in growing pollen tubes. Plant J 16: 393–401.

87. Abdel-GhanySE, Müller-MouléP, NiyogiKK, PilonM, ShikanaiT (2005) Two P-type ATPases are required for copper delivery in Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts. Plant Cell 17: 1233–1251.

88. AlexanderMP (1980) A versatile stain for pollen, fungi, yeast and bacteria. Stain Technol 55: 13–18.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2013 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#