Interaction between and during Mammalian Jaw Patterning and in the Pathogenesis of Syngnathia

English version České info

Syngnathia (bony fusion of the upper and lower jaw) is a rare human congenital condition, with fewer than sixty cases reported in the literature. Syngnathia typically presents as part of a complex syndrome comprising widespread oral and maxillofacial anomalies, but it can also occur in isolation. Most cartilage, bone, and connective tissue of the head and face is derived from neural crest cells. Hence, congenital craniofacial anomalies are often attributed to defects in neural crest cell formation, survival, migration, or differentiation. The etiology and pathogenesis of syngnathia however remains unknown. Here, we report that Foxc1 null embryos display bony syngnathia together with defects in maxillary and mandibular structures, and agenesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). In the absence of Foxc1, neural crest cell derived osteogenic patterning is affected, as osteoblasts develop ectopically in the maxillary prominence and fuse with the dentary bone. Furthermore, we observed that the craniofacial musculature is also perturbed in Foxc1 null mice, which highlights the complex tissue interactions required for proper jaw development. We present evidence that Foxc1 and Fgf8 genetically interact and that Fgf8 dosage is associated with variation in the syngnathic phenotype. Together our data demonstrates that Foxc1 – Fgf8 signaling regulates mammalian jaw patterning and provides a mechanistic basis for the pathogenesis of syngnathia. Furthermore, our work provides a framework for understanding jaw patterning and the etiology of other congenital craniofacial anomalies, including temporomandibular joint agenesis.

Vyšlo v časopise: Interaction between and during Mammalian Jaw Patterning and in the Pathogenesis of Syngnathia. PLoS Genet 9(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003949
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003949

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. HirataH, BesshoY, KokubuH, MasamizuY, YamadaS, et al. (2004) Instability of Hes7 protein is crucial for the somite segmentation clock. Nat Genet 36: 750–754.

2. NodenDM (1982) Patterns and organization of craniofacial skeletogenic and myogenic mesenchyme: a perspective. Prog Clin Biol Res 101: 167–203.

3. NodenDM (1983) The embryonic origins of avian cephalic and cervical muscles and associated connective tissues. Am J Anat 168: 257–276.

4. TrainorPA, TanSS, TamPP (1994) Cranial paraxial mesoderm: regionalisation of cell fate and impact on craniofacial development in mouse embryos. Development 120: 2397–2408.

5. TrainorPA, TamPP (1995) Cranial paraxial mesoderm and neural crest cells of the mouse embryo: co-distribution in the craniofacial mesenchyme but distinct segregation in branchial arches. Development 121: 2569–2582.

6. Le Douarin N, Kalcheim C (1999) The Neural Crest. Bard J, Barlow P, Kirk D, editors. Cambridge Univesity Press.

7. ChaiY, JiangX, ItoY, BringasPJr, HanJ, et al. (2000) Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127: 1671–1679.

8. GrossJB, HankenJ (2008) Review of fate-mapping studies of osteogenic cranial neural crest in vertebrates. Dev Biol 317: 389–400.

9. CoulyG, CreuzetS, BennaceurS, VincentC, Le DouarinNM (2002) Interactions between Hox-negative cephalic neural crest cells and the foregut endoderm in patterning the facial skeleton in the vertebrate head. Development 129: 1061–1073.

10. BrownCB, WenningJM, LuMM, EpsteinDJ, MeyersEN, et al. (2004) Cre-mediated excision of Fgf8 in the Tbx1 expression domain reveals a critical role for Fgf8 in cardiovascular development in the mouse. Dev Biol 267: 190–202.

11. TrumppA, DepewMJ, RubensteinJL, BishopJM, MartinGR (1999) Cre-mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes Dev 13: 3136–3148.

12. HaworthKE, HealyC, MorganP, SharpePT (2004) Regionalisation of early head ectoderm is regulated by endoderm and prepatterns the orofacial epithelium. Development 131: 4797–4806.

13. VeitchE, BegbieJ, SchillingTF, SmithMM, GrahamA (1999) Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest. Curr Biol 9: 1481–1484.

14. SatokataI, MaL, OhshimaH, BeiM, WooI, et al. (2000) Msx2 deficiency in mice causes pleiotropic defects in bone growth and ectodermal organ formation. Nature Genetics 24: 391–395.

15. SatokataI, MaasR (1994) Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat Genet 6: 348–356.

16. QuS, TuckerSC, ZhaoQ, deCrombruggheB, WisdomR (1999) Physical and genetic interactions between Alx4 and Cart1. Development 126: 359–369.

17. TuckerAS, MatthewsKL, SharpePT (1998) Transformation of tooth type induced by inhibition of BMP signaling. Science 282: 1136–1138.

18. LeeSH, BedardO, BuchtovaM, FuK, RichmanJM (2004) A new origin for the maxillary jaw. Dev Biol 276: 207–224.

19. Avery JK (2001) Oral development and histology. Thieme Medical Publishers.

20. CarlssonP, MahlapuuM (2002) Forkhead transcription factors: key players in development and metabolism. Dev Biol 250: 1–23.

21. HannenhalliS, KaestnerKH (2009) The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 10: 233–240.

22. ZarbalisK, SiegenthalerJA, ChoeY, MaySR, PetersonAS, et al. (2007) Cortical dysplasia and skull defects in mice with a Foxc1 allele reveal the role of meningeal differentiation in regulating cortical development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 14002–14007.

23. SiegenthalerJA, AshiqueAM, ZarbalisK, PattersonKP, HechtJH, et al. (2009) Retinoic acid from the meninges regulates cortical neuron generation. Cell 139: 597–609.

24. RiceR, RiceDP, OlsenBR, ThesleffI (2003) Progression of calvarial bone development requires Foxc1 regulation of Msx2 and Alx4. Dev Biol 262: 75–87.

25. RiceR, RiceDP, ThesleffI (2005) Foxc1 integrates Fgf and Bmp signalling independently of twist or noggin during calvarial bone development. Dev Dyn 233: 847–852.

26. KumeT, DengKY, WinfreyV, GouldDB, WalterMA, et al. (1998) The forkhead/winged helix gene Mf1 is disrupted in the pleiotropic mouse mutation congenital hydrocephalus. Cell 93: 985–996.

27. HongHK, LassJH, ChakravartiA (1999) Pleiotropic skeletal and ocular phenotypes of the mouse mutation congenital hydrocephalus (ch/Mf1) arise from a winged helix/forkhead transcriptionfactor gene. Hum Mol Genet 8: 625–637.

28. VivatbutsiriP, IchinoseS, HytonenM, SainioK, EtoK, et al. (2008) Impaired meningeal development in association with apical expansion of calvarial bone osteogenesis in the Foxc1 mutant. J Anat 212: 603–611.

29. KidsonSH, KumeT, DengK, WinfreyV, HoganBL (1999) The forkhead/winged-helix gene, Mf1, is necessary for the normal development of the cornea and formation of the anterior chamber in the mouse eye. Dev Biol 211: 306–322.

30. SeoS, SinghHP, LacalPM, SasmanA, FatimaA, et al. (2012) Forkhead box transcription factor FoxC1 preserves corneal transparency by regulating vascular growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 2015–2020.

31. SmithRS, ZabaletaA, KumeT, SavinovaOV, KidsonSH, et al. (2000) Haploinsufficiency of the transcription factors FOXC1 and FOXC2 results in aberrant ocular development. Hum Mol Genet 9: 1021–1032.

32. WilmB, JamesRG, SchultheissTM, HoganBL (2004) The forkhead genes, Foxc1 and Foxc2, regulate paraxial versus intermediate mesoderm cell fate. Dev Biol 271: 176–189.

33. KumeT, DengK, HoganBL (2000) Murine forkhead/winged helix genes Foxc1 (Mf1) and Foxc2 (Mfh1) are required for the early organogenesis of the kidney and urinary tract. Development 127: 1387–1395.

34. PurcellP, JheonA, ViveroMP, RahimiH, JooA, et al. (2012) Spry1 and spry2 are essential for development of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 91: 387–393.

35. EconomouAD, OhazamaA, PorntaveetusT, SharpePT, KondoS, et al. (2012) Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate. Nat Genet 44: 348–351.

36. QuinnJC, MolinekM, MartynogaBS, ZakiPA, FaedoA, et al. (2007) Pax6 controls cerebral cortical cell number by regulating exit from the cell cycle and specifies cortical cell identity by a cell autonomous mechanism. Dev Biol 302: 50–65.

37. LiuW, SeleverJ, MuraliD, SunX, BruggerSM, et al. (2005) Threshold-specific requirements for Bmp4 in mandibular development. Dev Biol 283: 282–293.

38. LiuW, SunX, BrautA, MishinaY, BehringerRR, et al. (2005) Distinct functions for Bmp signaling in lip and palate fusion in mice. Development 132: 1453–1461.

39. BarlowAJ, Francis-WestPH (1997) Ectopic application of recombinant BMP-2 and BMP-4 can change patterning of developing chick facial primordia. Development 124: 391–398.

40. KuriharaY, KuriharaH, SuzukiH, KodamaT, MaemuraK, et al. (1994) Elevated blood pressure and craniofacial abnormalities in mice deficient in endothelin-1. Nature 368: 703–710.

41. ClouthierDE, HosodaK, RichardsonJA, WilliamsSC, YanagisawaH, et al. (1998) Cranial and cardiac neural crest defects in endothelin-A receptor-deficient mice. Development 125: 813–824.

42. YanagisawaH, YanagisawaM, KapurRP, RichardsonJA, WilliamsSC, et al. (1998) Dual genetic pathways of endothelin-mediated intercellular signaling revealed by targeted disruption of endothelin converting enzyme-1 gene. Development 125: 825–836.

43. SatoT, KuriharaY, AsaiR, KawamuraY, TonamiK, et al. (2008) An endothelin-1 switch specifies maxillomandibular identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18806–18811.

44. RuestLB, XiangX, LimKC, LeviG, ClouthierDE (2004) Endothelin-A receptor-dependent and -independent signaling pathways in establishing mandibular identity. Development 131: 4413–4423.

45. WilsonJ, TuckerAS (2004) Fgf and Bmp signals repress the expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular mesenchyme and control the position of the developing jaw joint. Dev Biol 266: 138–150.

46. TuckerAS, YamadaG, GrigoriouM, PachnisV, SharpePT (1999) Fgf-8 determines rostral-caudal polarity in the first branchial arch. Development 126: 51–61.

47. MinaM, WangYH, IvanisevicAM, UpholtWB, RodgersB (2002) Region- and stage-specific effects of FGFs and BMPs in chick mandibular morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 223: 333–352.

48. Abu-IssaR, SmythG, SmoakI, YamamuraK, MeyersEN (2002) Fgf8 is required for pharyngeal arch and cardiovascular development in the mouse. Development 129: 4613–4625.

49. FrankDU, FotheringhamLK, BrewerJA, MugliaLJ, Tristani-FirouziM, et al. (2002) An Fgf8 mouse mutant phenocopies human 22q11 deletion syndrome. Development 129: 4591–4603.

50. ShifleyET, VanhornKM, Perez-BalaguerA, FranklinJD, WeinsteinM, et al. (2008) Oscillatory lunatic fringe activity is crucial for segmentation of the anterior but not posterior skeleton. Development 135: 899–908.

51. FergusonCA, TuckerAS, SharpePT (2000) Temporospatial cell interactions regulating mandibular and maxillary arch patterning. Development 127: 403–412.

52. QiuM, BulfoneA, GhattasI, MenesesJJ, ChristensenL, et al. (1997) Role of the Dlx homeobox genes in proximodistal patterning of the branchial arches: mutations of Dlx-1, Dlx-2, and Dlx-1 and -2 alter morphogenesis of proximal skeletal and soft tissue structures derived from the first and second arches. Dev Biol 185: 165–184.

53. QiuM, BulfoneA, MartinezS, MenesesJJ, ShimamuraK, et al. (1995) Null mutation of Dlx-2 results in abnormal morphogenesis of proximal first and second branchial arch derivatives and abnormal differentiation in the forebrain. Genes Dev 9: 2523–2538.

54. DepewMJ, LiuJK, LongJE, PresleyR, MenesesJJ, et al. (1999) Dlx5 regulates regional development of the branchial arches and sensory capsules. Development 126: 3831–3846.

55. DepewMJ, LufkinT, RubensteinJL (2002) Specification of jaw subdivisions by Dlx genes. Science 298: 381–385.

56. DepewMJ, SimpsonCA, MorassoM, RubensteinJL (2005) Reassessing the Dlx code: the genetic regulation of branchial arch skeletal pattern and development. Journal Of Anatomy 207: 501–561.

57. JeongJ, LiX, McEvillyRJ, RosenfeldMG, LufkinT, et al. (2008) Dlx genes pattern mammalian jaw primordium by regulating both lower jaw-specific and upper jaw-specific genetic programs. Development 135: 2905–2916.

58. PoswilloD (1973) The pathogenesis of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 35: 302–328.

59. LasterZ, TemkinD, ZarfinY, KushnirA (2001) Complete bony fusion of the mandible to the zygomatic complex and maxillary tuberosity: case report and review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30: 75–79.

60. SnijmanPC, PrinslooJG (1966) Congenital fusion of the gums. Amer J Dis Child 112: 593–595.

61. Hegtvedt AK (1993) Diagnosis and management of facial asymmetry. Peterson LJ, Indressano AT, Marciani RD, Roser SM, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

62. HeudeE, RivalsI, CoulyG, LeviG (2011) Masticatory muscle defects in hemifacial microsomia: a new embryological concept. Am J Med Genet A 155A: 1991–1995.

63. HirschfelderU, PiechotE, SchulteM, LeherA (2004) Abnormalities of the TMJ and the musculature in the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum (OAV). A CT study. J Orofac Orthop 65: 204–216.

64. Huisinga-FischerCE, VaandragerJM, Prahl-AndersenB, van GinkelFC (2004) Masticatory muscle right-left differences in controls and hemifacial microsomia patients. J Craniofac Surg 15: 42–46.

65. Huisinga-FischerCE, ZonneveldFW, VaandragerJM, Prahl-AndersenB (2001) Relationship in hypoplasia between the masticatory muscles and the craniofacial skeleton in hemifacial microsomia, as determined by 3-D CT imaging. J Craniofac Surg 12: 31–40.

66. HeudeE, BouhaliK, KuriharaY, KuriharaH, CoulyG, et al. (2010) Jaw muscularization requires Dlx expression by cranial neural crest cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 11441–11446.

67. TavaresAL, GarciaEL, KuhnK, WoodsCM, WilliamsT, et al. (2012) Ectodermal-derived Endothelin1 is required for patterning the distal and intermediate domains of the mouse mandibular arch. Dev Biol 371: 47–56.

68. ThomasBL, LiuJK, RubensteinJL, SharpePT (2000) Independent regulation of Dlx2 expression in the epithelium and mesenchyme of the first branchial arch. Development 127: 217–224.

69. BurketLW (1936) Congenital bony temporomandibular ankylosis and facial hemiatrophy. Review of the literature and report of a case. JAMA 106: 1719–1722.

70. DawsonKH, GrussJS, MyallRW (1997) Congenital bony syngnathia: a proposed classification. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34: 141–146.

71. Gripp K, Escobar LF (2006) Facial Bones. Stevenson RE, Hall JG, editors. New York: Oxford University Press.

72. MeyersEN, MartinGR (1999) Differences in left-right axis pathways in mouse and chick: functions of FGF8 and SHH. Science 285: 403–406.

73. AlbertsonRC, YelickPC (2005) Roles for fgf8 signaling in left-right patterning of the visceral organs and craniofacial skeleton. Dev Biol 283: 310–321.

74. MedeirosDM, CrumpJG (2012) New perspectives on pharyngeal dorsoventral patterning in development and evolution of the vertebrate jaw. Dev Biol 371: 121–135.

75. FishJL, VillmoareB, KöbernickK, CompagnucciC, BritanovaO, et al. (2011) Satb2, modularity, and the evolvability of the vertebrate jaw. Evol Dev 13: 549–564.

76. CompagnucciC, Debiais-ThibaudM, CoolenM, FishJ, GriffinJN, et al. (2013) Pattern and polarity in the development and evolution of the gnathostome jaw: both conservation and heterotopy in the branchial arches of the shark, Scyliorhinus canicula. Dev Biol 377: 428–448.

77. DepewMJ, CompagnucciC (2008) Tweaking the hinge and caps: testing a model of the organization of jaws. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 310: 315–335.

78. DepewMJ, SimpsonCA (2006) 21st century neontology and the comparative development of the vertebrate skull. Developmental Dynamics 235: 1256–1291.

79. NodenD (1983) The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. Devl Biol 96: 144–165.

80. TokitaM, SchneiderRA (2009) Developmental origins of species-specific muscle pattern. Dev Biol 331: 311–325.

81. PurcellP, JooBW, HuJK, TranPV, CalicchioML, et al. (2009) Temporomandibular joint formation requires two distinct hedgehog-dependent steps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18297–18302.

82. RiddleRD, JohnsonRL, LauferE, TabinC (1993) Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75: 1401–1416.

83. Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer RR (2003) Manipulating the mouse embryo. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.