Endoscopic and microsurgical extirpation of a herniated intervertebral disc in the lumbar region
Authors:
M. Mrůzek; O. Krejčí; T. Hrbáč; R. Lipina
Authors‘ workplace:
Neurochirurgická klinika LF OU a FN, Ostrava
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2025; 105(4): 139-143
Category:
Of different specialties
Overview
Mrůzek M, Krejčí O, Hrbáč T, Lipina R. Endoscopic and microsurgical extirpation of a herniated intervertebral disc in the lumbar region
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes and complications after endoscopic and microsurgical extirpation of herniated intervertebral discs in the L4/L5 and L5/S1 segments.
Methods: A retrospective study included 70 patients, divided into two groups: 35 after microsurgical discectomy (MD) and 35 after endoscopic discectomy (ED) via the interlaminar approach. The parameters VAS, ODI, duration of surgery, hospitalization, complications and recurrence after 18 months of follow-up were evaluated.
Results: Both techniques led to significant improvements in VAS and ODI. The endoscopic technique showed shorter hospitalization (2.1 vs. 3.8 days; p < 0.001), but a higher recurrence rate (11.4% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.048). The microsurgical method provided more stable long-term results.
Keywords:
lumbar spine – learning curve – recurrence – endoscopic discectomy – microsurgical discectomy – interlaminar approach – intervertebral disc herniation
Sources
1. Chen X, Chamoli U, Lapkin S, et al. Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(11): 2588–2601.
2. Fei Y, Ren L, Ye Q, et al. Endoscopic and microscopic interlaminar discectomy for the treatment of far-migrated lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study with a 24-month follow-up. J Pain Res. 2021; 14 : 1593–1600.
3. Hornung AL, Baker JD, Mallow GM, et al. Resorption of lumbar disk herniation: mechanisms, clinical predictors, and future directions. JBJS Rev. 2023; 11(1).
4. Liu KC, Hsieh MH, Yang CC, et al. Full endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID) for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, clinical outcome, and prognostic factors. J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(2): 483–494.
5. Máca K, Ďuriš K, Smrčka M. Endoskopické operace výhřezu bederních meziobratlových plotének – první zkušenosti. Čes a Slov Neurol N. 2019; 82(5): 541–547.
6. Mayer HM. A history of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery: what have we learnt? Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019 : 4583943.
7. Nakamura JI, Yoshihara K. Initial clinical outcomes of percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy using an interlaminar approach at the L4–L5. Pain Physician. 2017; 20(4): E507–E512.
8. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33(9): 931–939.
9. Takebayashi K, Oshima Y, Fujita M, et al. Comparison of the interlaminar and transforaminal approaches for full-endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of L4/5 lumbar disc herniation. Neurol Med Chir. (Tokyo) 2023; 63(7): 313–320.
10. Wei FL, Li T, Gao QY, et al. Eight surgical interventions for lum bar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis on complications. Front Surg. 2021; 8 : 679142.
11. Won YI, Yuh WT, Kwon SW, et al. Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a narrative review. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;
15(Suppl 3): S47–S53.
12. Kim JS, Phan K, Kim HJ, et al. Interlaminar full-endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter, assessor-blind randomized controlled trial protocol. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1): 325.
13. Zhang T, Guo N, Wang K, et al. Comparison of outcomes between tubular microdiscectomy and conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1): 479.
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2025 Issue 4
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Memantine in Dementia Therapy – Current Findings and Possible Future Applications
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Hope Awakens with Early Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease Based on Skin Odor
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Most read in this issue
- Colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic: challenges and the role of general practitioners
- Endoscopic and microsurgical extirpation of a herniated intervertebral disc in the lumbar region
- The therapeutic potential of bee products
- Mental health of older adults: Barriers to psychotherapy and the role of general practitioners