Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics

1. Regalado A. Apple has plans for your DNA. The iphone could become a new tool for genetic studies. MIT Technology Review. 5 May 2015. http://www.technologyreview.com/news/537081/apple-has-plans-for-your-dna/

2. Merritt R. DNA Chip Will Plug Into Handsets. EE Times. 6 Sept. 2014. http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1322662

3. President B. Obama. State of the Union 2015. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sotu

4. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J 2015; 372:793–5.

5. Hawgood S, Hook-Barnard IG, O'Brien TC, Yamamoto KR. Precision medicine: Beyond the inflection point. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 12;7(300):300ps17. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9970 26268311

6. Jain SH, Powers BW, Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS. The digital phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):462–3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3223 25965751

7. van Schaik TA, Kovalevskaya NV, Protopapas E, Whaid H, Nilsen GGF, et al. The need to redefine genomic data sharing: A focus on data accessibility. Applied & Translational Genomics 2014; 3:100–104.

8. Ball MP, Thakuria JV, Zaranek AW, Clegg T, Rosenbaum AM, et al. A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:11920–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201904109 22797899

9. NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy. August 27, 2014. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-124.html

10. Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. http://genomicsandhealth.org/about-global-alliance

11. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Elrich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 2013; 339:321–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566 23329047

12. Erlich Y, Narayanan A. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15:409–21. doi: 10.1038/nrg3723 24805122

13. Humbert M, Ayday E, Hubaux JP, Telenti A. Reconciling Utility with Privacy in Genomics. ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. Scottsdale, AZ, USA Nov. 2014

14. Greenbaum D, Sboner A, Mu XJ, Gerstein M. Genomics and Privacy: Implications of the New Reality of Closed Data for the Field. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7(12): e1002278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002278 22144881

15. Jamal L, Sapp JC, Lewis K, Yanes T, Facio FM, et al. Research participants' attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information. Eur J Hum Genet.2014; 22:964–8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.276 24281371

16. Oliver JM, Slashinski MJ, Wang T, Kelly PA, Hilsenbeck SG, et al. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15:106–14. doi: 10.1159/000334718 22213783

17. Nicholson Price W. Black-box medicine. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 2015; 28:419–67

18. Marmor A. What is the right to privacy? Philosophy and Public Affairs 2015; 43: 3–26.

19. Tasioulas J, Vayena E. Getting human rights right in global health policy. Lancet. 2015; 385:e42–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61418-5 25308288

20. Carter P, Laurie GT, Dixon-Woods M. The social license for research: why care.data ran into trouble. J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):404–9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374 25617016

21. Vayena E, Mastroianni A, Kahn J. Caught in the web: informed consent for online health research. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5:173fs6. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004798 23427242

22. Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, et al. Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141–6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71 24801761

23. Minari J, Teare H, Mitchell C, Kaye J, Kato K. The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research. Genome Med. 2014; 6:118. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0118-y 25593596

24. Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Vorhaus DB, Church GM. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9:406–11. doi: 10.1038/nrg2360 18379574

25. Gavison RE. Privacy and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal 1980; 89:421–471.

26. Laurie G. The right not to know. J Law Med Ethics 2014; 42(1):53–63.

27. United States v. Jones 565 U.S. ___ (2012). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/10-1259/

28. Erlich Y, Williams JB, Glazer D, Yocum K, Farahany N. Redefining genomic privacy: trust and empowerment. PLoS Biol. 2014; 12:e1001983 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983 25369215

29. Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1180–4. 13679534

30. Hunter KG, Laurie GT. Involving publics in biobank governance: moving beyond existing approaches. In: Widdows H, Mullen C, editors. The Governance of Genetic Information. Cambridge University Press; 2009 pp.151–177.

31. O'Doherty KC, Hawkins AK, Burgess MM. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75:1604–11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026 22867865

32. Dove ES, Joly Y, Knoppers BM. Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks. Genome Biol. 2012; 13:158. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-158 22647613

33. Laurie G. Reflexive governance in biobanking: on the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law. Hum Genet.2011; 130:347–56. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1066-x 21766192

34. Hafen E, Kossmann D, Brand A. Health data cooperatives—citizen empowerment. Methods Inf Med. 2014;53:82–6. doi: 10.3414/ME13-02-0051 24514946

35. Weber GM, Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. JAMA 2014; 311:2479–80. 24854141