The Influence of Distance and Level of Care on Delivery Place in Rural Zambia: A Study of Linked National Data in a Geographic Information System

English version České info

Background:
Maternal and perinatal mortality could be reduced if all women delivered in settings where skilled attendants could provide emergency obstetric care (EmOC) if complications arise. Research on determinants of skilled attendance at delivery has focussed on household and individual factors, neglecting the influence of the health service environment, in part due to a lack of suitable data. The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of distance to care and level of care on women's use of health facilities for delivery in rural Zambia, and to compare their population impact to that of other important determinants.

Methods and Findings:
Using a geographic information system (GIS), we linked national household data from the Zambian Demographic and Health Survey 2007 with national facility data from the Zambian Health Facility Census 2005 and calculated straight-line distances. Health facilities were classified by whether they provided comprehensive EmOC (CEmOC), basic EmOC (BEmOC), or limited or substandard services. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the influence of distance to care and level of care on place of delivery (facility or home) for 3,682 rural births, controlling for a wide range of confounders. Only a third of rural Zambian births occurred at a health facility, and half of all births were to mothers living more than 25 km from a facility of BEmOC standard or better. As distance to the closest health facility doubled, the odds of facility delivery decreased by 29% (95% CI, 14%–40%). Independently, each step increase in level of care led to 26% higher odds of facility delivery (95% CI, 7%–48%). The population impact of poor geographic access to EmOC was at least of similar magnitude as that of low maternal education, household poverty, or lack of female autonomy.

Conclusions:
Lack of geographic access to emergency obstetric care is a key factor explaining why most rural deliveries in Zambia still occur at home without skilled care. Addressing geographic and quality barriers is crucial to increase service use and to lower maternal and perinatal mortality. Linking datasets using GIS has great potential for future research and can help overcome the neglect of health system factors in research and policy.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Vyšlo v časopise: The Influence of Distance and Level of Care on Delivery Place in Rural Zambia: A Study of Linked National Data in a Geographic Information System. PLoS Med 8(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000394
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000394

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. KinneyMV

KerberKJ

BlackRE

CohenB

NkrumahF

2010 Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: Where and why do they die? PLoS Med 7 e1000294

2. LawnJE

LeeAC

KinneyM

SibleyL

CarloWA

2009 Two million intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: Where, why, and what can be done? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107 Suppl 1 S5 18, S19

3. CampbellOM

GrahamWJ

2006 Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: Getting on with what works. Lancet 368 1284 1299

4. LawnJE

CousensS

ZupanJ

2005 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 365 891 900

5. UNICEF 2008 Progress for Children. A Report Card on Maternal Mortality (No. 7). 9 p. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/progressforchildren/files/Progress_for_Children-No._7_Lo-Res_082008.pdf. Accessed: 20 October 2010

6. ThaddeusS

MaineD

1994 Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38 1091 1110

7. GabryschS

CampbellOM

2009 Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9 34

8. PhillipsKA

MorrisonKR

AndersenR

AdayLA

1998 Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: Assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization. Health Serv Res 33 571 596

9. GageAJ

Guirlene CalixteM

2006 Effects of the physical accessibility of maternal health services on their use in rural Haiti. Popul Stud (Camb) 60 271 288

10. McLaffertySL

2003 GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health 24 25 42

11. RushtonG

2003 Public health, GIS, and spatial analytic tools. Annu Rev Public Health 24 43 56

12. RoseM

AbderrahimN

StantonC

HelselD

2001 Maternity Care: A Comparative Report on the Availability and Use of Maternity Services. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys Women's Module & Services Availability Module 1993-1996. In: Carolina Population Center, Editor. MEASURE Evaluation Technical Report Series No 9. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

13. HountonS

ChapmanG

MentenJ

De BrouwereV

EnsorT

2008 Accessibility and utilisation of delivery care within a skilled care initiative in rural Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health 13 44 52

14. Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC), University of Zambia, Macro International Inc. 2009 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Calverton, Maryland, USA: CSO and Macro International Inc. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR211/FR211%5Brevised-05-12-2009%5D.pdf. Accessed: 20 October 2010

15. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The World Factbook. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html. Accessed: 20 October 2010

16. Health Facility Assessment Technical Working Group 2005 Profiles of Health Facility Assessment Methods. MEASURE Evaluation, USAID. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/tools/monitoring-evaluation-systems/hfa-methods/. Accessed: 20 October 2010

17. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD 2009 Monitoring emergency obstetric care, a handbook. Geneva: WHO. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/9789241547734/en/index.html. Accessed: 20 October 2010

18. PaxtonA

BaileyP

LobisS

FryD

2006 Global patterns in availability of emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 93 300 307

19. UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA 1997 Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services. New York: United Nations Children Fund. Available at: http://www.amddprogram.org/d/content/technical-resources. Accessed: 20 October 2010

20. PaxtonA

MaineD

HijabN

2003 Using the UN process indicators of emergency obstetric services. Questions and answers. New York. Available at: http://www.amddprogram.org/d/content/technical-resources. Accessed: 20 October 2010

21. PaxtonA

BaileyP

LobisS

2006 The United Nations process indicators for emergency obstetric care: Reflections based on a decade of experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95 192 208

22. MEASURE DHS. GIS methodology 2010 Collecting geographic data. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/aboutsurveys/gis/methodology.cfm. Accessed: 20 October

23. HoweLD

HargreavesJR

HuttlySR

2008 Emerg Themes Epidemiol 5 3

24. KolenikovS

AngelesG

2004 The use of discrete data in principal component analysis: Theory, simulations, and applications to socioeconomic indices. Carolina Population Center, UNC

25. StephensonR

TsuiAO

2002 Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Stud Fam Plann 33 309 320

26. StekelenburgJ

KyanaminaS

MukelabaiM

WolffersI

van RoosmalenJ

2004 Waiting too long: Low use of maternal health services in Kalabo, Zambia. Trop Med Int Health 9 390 398

27. MayhewM

HansenPM

PetersDH

EdwardA

SinghLP

2008 Determinants of skilled birth attendant utilization in Afghanistan: A cross-sectional study. Am J Public Health 98 1849 1856

28. TsuiAO

UkwuaniF

GuilkeyDK

AngelesG

2002 Health Program Effects on Individual use of services. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/pdf/wp-02-60.pdf. Accessed: 20 October 2010

29. HotchkissDR

KrasovecK

El-Idrissi MDZ-E, EckertE

KarimAM

2003 The role of user charges and structural attributes of quality on the use of maternal health services in Morocco. Available at: http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/Pnada384.pdf. Accessed: 20 October 2010

30. MasiyeF

ChitahMB

ChandaP

SimeoF

2008 Removal of user fees at primary health care facilities in Zambia: A study of the effects on utilisation and quality of care. Available at: http://www.equinetafrica.org/bibl/docs/Dis57FINchitah.pdf. Accessed: 20 October 2010