Budding Yeast ATM/ATR Control Meiotic Double-Strand Break (DSB) Levels by Down-Regulating Rec114, an Essential Component of the DSB-machinery

English version České info

An essential feature of meiosis is Spo11 catalysis of programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Evidence suggests that the number of DSBs generated per meiosis is genetically determined and that this ability to maintain a pre-determined DSB level, or “DSB homeostasis”, might be a property of the meiotic program. Here, we present direct evidence that Rec114, an evolutionarily conserved essential component of the meiotic DSB-machinery, interacts with DSB hotspot DNA, and that Tel1 and Mec1, the budding yeast ATM and ATR, respectively, down-regulate Rec114 upon meiotic DSB formation through phosphorylation. Mimicking constitutive phosphorylation reduces the interaction between Rec114 and DSB hotspot DNA, resulting in a reduction and/or delay in DSB formation. Conversely, a non-phosphorylatable rec114 allele confers a genome-wide increase in both DSB levels and in the interaction between Rec114 and the DSB hotspot DNA. These observations strongly suggest that Tel1 and/or Mec1 phosphorylation of Rec114 following Spo11 catalysis down-regulates DSB formation by limiting the interaction between Rec114 and DSB hotspots. We also present evidence that Ndt80, a meiosis specific transcription factor, contributes to Rec114 degradation, consistent with its requirement for complete cessation of DSB formation. Loss of Rec114 foci from chromatin is associated with homolog synapsis but independent of Ndt80 or Tel1/Mec1 phosphorylation. Taken together, we present evidence for three independent ways of regulating Rec114 activity, which likely contribute to meiotic DSBs-homeostasis in maintaining genetically determined levels of breaks.

Vyšlo v časopise: Budding Yeast ATM/ATR Control Meiotic Double-Strand Break (DSB) Levels by Down-Regulating Rec114, an Essential Component of the DSB-machinery. PLoS Genet 9(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003545
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003545

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. KeeneyS, GirouxCN, KlecknerN (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88 : 375–384.

2. MurakamiH, KeeneyS (2008) Regulating the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genes Dev 22 : 286–292.

3. BordeV, GoldmanAS, LichtenM (2000) Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 290 : 806–809.

4. HochwagenA, ThamWH, BrarGA, AmonA (2005) The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell 122 : 861–873.

5. BaudatF, NicolasA (1997) Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94 : 5213–5218.

6. BuhlerC, BordeV, LichtenM (2007) Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 5: e324.

7. PanJ, SasakiM, KniewelR, MurakamiH, BlitzblauHG, et al. (2011) A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144 : 719–731.

8. JoyceEF, PedersenM, TiongS, White-BrownSK, PaulA, et al. (2011) Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair. J Cell Biol 195 : 359–367.

9. LangeJ, PanJ, ColeF, ThelenMP, JasinM, et al. (2011) ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 479 : 237–240.

10. ManceraE, BourgonR, BrozziA, HuberW, SteinmetzLM (2008) High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454 : 479–485.

11. ZhangL, KimKP, KlecknerNE, StorlazziA (2011) Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 : 20036–20041.

12. CarballoJA, ChaRS (2007) Meiotic roles of Mec1, a budding yeast homolog of mammalian ATR/ATM. Chromosome Res 15 : 539–550.

13. HarperJW, ElledgeSJ (2007) The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell 28 : 739–745.

14. CarballoJA, JohnsonAL, SedgwickSG, ChaRS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132 : 758–770.

15. LydallD, NikolskyY, BishopDK, WeinertT (1996) A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383 : 840–843.

16. TurnerJM, AprelikovaO, XuX, WangR, KimS, et al. (2004) BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol 14 : 2135–2142.

17. PanizzaS, MendozaMA, BerlingerM, HuangL, NicolasA, et al. (2011) Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146 : 372–383.

18. AcquavivaL, SzekvolgyiL, DichtlB, DichtlBS, de La Roche Saint AndreC, et al. (2013) The COMPASS subunit Spp1 links histone methylation to initiation of meiotic recombination. Science 339 : 215–218.

19. SommermeyerV, BeneutC, ChaplaisE, SerrentinoME, BordeV (2013) Spp1, a Member of the Set1 Complex, Promotes Meiotic DSB Formation in Promoters by Tethering Histone H3K4 Methylation Sites to Chromosome Axes. Mol Cell 49 : 43–54.

20. MalekiS, NealeMJ, AroraC, HendersonKA, KeeneyS (2007) Interactions between Mei4, Rec114, and other proteins required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma 116 : 471–486.

21. MiyoshiT, ItoM, KugouK, YamadaS, FuruichiM, et al. (2012) A central coupler for recombination initiation linking chromosome architecture to S phase checkpoint. Mol Cell 47 : 722–733.

22. LiJ, HookerGW, RoederGS (2006) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer2, Mei4 and Rec114 form a complex required for meiotic double-strand break formation. Genetics 173 : 1969–1981.

23. MalloryJC, PetesTD (2000) Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97 : 13749–13754.

24. TravenA, HeierhorstJ (2005) SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. Bioessays 27 : 397–407.

25. MahadevaiahSK, TurnerJM, BaudatF, RogakouEP, de BoerP, et al. (2001) Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 27 : 271–276.

26. Cartagena-LirolaH, GueriniI, ViscardiV, LucchiniG, LongheseMP (2006) Budding Yeast Sae2 is an In Vivo Target of the Mec1 and Tel1 Checkpoint Kinases During Meiosis. Cell Cycle 5 : 1549–1559.

27. FalkJE, ChanAC, HoffmannE, HochwagenA (2010) A Mec1 -⁠ and PP4-dependent checkpoint couples centromere pairing to meiotic recombination. Dev Cell 19 : 599–611.

28. ChaRS, KlecknerN (2002) ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297 : 602–606.

29. WuHY, BurgessSM (2006) Two distinct surveillance mechanisms monitor meiotic chromosome metabolism in budding yeast. Curr Biol 16 : 2473–2479.

30. AlaniE, PadmoreR, KlecknerN (1990) Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61 : 419–436.

31. NairzK, KleinF (1997) mre11S–a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11 : 2272–2290.

32. UsuiT, OgawaH, PetriniJH (2001) A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7 : 1255–1266.

33. BishopDK, ParkD, XuL, KlecknerN (1992) DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69 : 439–456.

34. MartiniE, DiazRL, HunterN, KeeneyS (2006) Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126 : 285–295.

35. ZandersS, Sonntag BrownM, ChenC, AlaniE (2011) Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 188 : 511–521.

36. HunterN, KlecknerN (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106 : 59–70.

37. KugouK, OhtaK (2009) Genome-wide high-resolution chromatin immunoprecipitation of meiotic chromosomal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557 : 285–304.

38. XuL, AjimuraM, PadmoreR, KleinC, KlecknerN (1995) NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 15 : 6572–6581.

39. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106 : 47–57.

40. PrielerS, PenknerA, BordeV, KleinF (2005) The control of Spo11's interaction with meiotic recombination hotspots. Genes Dev 19 : 255–269.

41. SymM, EngebrechtJA, RoederGS (1993) ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72 : 365–378.

42. StorlazziA, XuL, SchwachaA, KlecknerN (1996) Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93 : 9043–9048.

43. BornerGV, KlecknerN, HunterN (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117 : 29–45.

44. MolnarM, ParisiS, KakiharaY, NojimaH, YamamotoA, et al. (2001) Characterization of rec7, an early meiotic recombination gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 157 : 519–532.

45. MaloneRE, BullardS, HermistonM, RiegerR, CoolM, et al. (1991) Isolation of mutants defective in early steps of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 128 : 79–88.

46. AjimuraM, LeemSH, OgawaH (1993) Identification of new genes required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 133 : 51–66.

47. SasanumaH, HirotaK, FukudaT, KakushoN, KugouK, et al. (2008) Cdc7-dependent phosphorylation of Mer2 facilitates initiation of yeast meiotic recombination. Genes Dev 22 : 398–410.

48. KumarR, BourbonHM, de MassyB (2010) Functional conservation of Mei4 for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation from yeasts to mice. Genes Dev 24 : 1266–1280.

49. GoldfarbT, LichtenM (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000520.

50. AcostaI, OntosoD, San-SegundoPA (2011) The budding yeast polo-like kinase Cdc5 regulates the Ndt80 branch of the meiotic recombination checkpoint pathway. Mol Biol Cell 22 : 3478–3490.

51. KatoR, OgawaH (1994) An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 22 : 3104–3112.

52. HepworthSR, FriesenH, SegallJ (1998) NDT80 and the meiotic recombination checkpoint regulate expression of middle sporulation-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18 : 5750–5761.

53. PakJ, SegallJ (2002) Role of Ndt80, Sum1, and Swe1 as targets of the meiotic recombination checkpoint that control exit from pachytene and spore formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22 : 6430–6440.

54. RobineN, UematsuN, AmiotF, GidrolX, BarillotE, et al. (2007) Genome-wide redistribution of meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27 : 1868–1880.

55. XuL, KlecknerN (1995) Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J 14 : 5115–5128.

56. WuTC, LichtenM (1995) Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140 : 55–66.

57. de MassyB, NicolasA (1993) The control in cis of the position and the amount of the ARG4 meiotic double-strand break of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 12 : 1459–1466.

58. XueY, RenJ, GaoX, JinC, WenL, et al. (2008) GPS 2.0, a tool to predict kinase-specific phosphorylation sites in hierarchy. Mol Cell Proteomics 7 : 1598–1608.

59. PadmoreR, CaoL, KlecknerN (1991) Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 66 : 1239–1256.

60. GeymonatM, SpanosA, JensenS, SedgwickSG (2010) Phosphorylation of Lte1 by Cdk prevents polarized growth during mitotic arrest in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 191 : 1097–1112.

61. MurakamiH, BordeV, NicolasA, KeeneyS (2009) Gel electrophoresis assays for analyzing DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at various spatial resolutions. Methods Mol Biol 557 : 117–142.