#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

A Polycomb Group Protein Is Retained at Specific Sites on Chromatin in Mitosis


Epigenetic regulation of gene expression, including by Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins, may depend on heritable chromatin states, but how these states can be propagated through mitosis is unclear. Using immunofluorescence and biochemical fractionation, we find PcG proteins associated with mitotic chromosomes in Drosophila S2 cells. Genome-wide sequencing of chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP–SEQ) from mitotic cells indicates that Posterior Sex Combs (PSC) is not present at well-characterized PcG targets including Hox genes in mitosis, but does remain at a subset of interphase sites. Many of these persistent sites overlap with chromatin domain borders described by Sexton et al. (2012), which are genomic regions characterized by low levels of long range contacts. Persistent PSC binding sites flank both Hox gene clusters. We hypothesize that disruption of long-range chromatin contacts in mitosis contributes to PcG protein release from most sites, while persistent binding at sites with minimal long-range contacts may nucleate re-establishment of PcG binding and chromosome organization after mitosis.


Vyšlo v časopise: A Polycomb Group Protein Is Retained at Specific Sites on Chromatin in Mitosis. PLoS Genet 8(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003135
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003135

Souhrn

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression, including by Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins, may depend on heritable chromatin states, but how these states can be propagated through mitosis is unclear. Using immunofluorescence and biochemical fractionation, we find PcG proteins associated with mitotic chromosomes in Drosophila S2 cells. Genome-wide sequencing of chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP–SEQ) from mitotic cells indicates that Posterior Sex Combs (PSC) is not present at well-characterized PcG targets including Hox genes in mitosis, but does remain at a subset of interphase sites. Many of these persistent sites overlap with chromatin domain borders described by Sexton et al. (2012), which are genomic regions characterized by low levels of long range contacts. Persistent PSC binding sites flank both Hox gene clusters. We hypothesize that disruption of long-range chromatin contacts in mitosis contributes to PcG protein release from most sites, while persistent binding at sites with minimal long-range contacts may nucleate re-establishment of PcG binding and chromosome organization after mitosis.


Zdroje

1. DovatS, RonniT, RussellD, FerriniR, CobbBS, et al. (2002) A common mechanism for mitotic inactivation of C2H2 zinc finger DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev 16 (23)

2985–2990.

2. FischleW, TsengBS, DormannHL, UeberheideBM, GarciaBA, et al. (2005) Regulation of HP1-chromatin binding by histone H3 methylation and phosphorylation. Nature 438 (7071)

1116–1122.

3. HirotaT, LippJJ, TohBH, PetersJM (2005) Histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation by Aurora B causes HP1 dissociation from heterochromatin. Nature 438 (7071)

1176–1180.

4. XingH, WilkersonDC, MayhewCN, LubertEJ, SkaggsHS, et al. (2005) Mechanism of hsp70i gene bookmarking. Science 307 (5708)

421–423.

5. DelcuveGP, HeS, DavieJR (2008) Mitotic partitioning of transcription factors. J Cell Biochem 105 (1)

1–8.

6. XingH, VanderfordNL, SargeKD (2008) The TBP-PP2A mitotic complex bookmarks genes by preventing condensin action. Nat Cell Biol 10 (11)

1318–1323.

7. BlobelGA, KadaukeS, WangE, LauAW, ZuberJ, et al. (2009) A reconfigured pattern of MLL occupancy within mitotic chromatin promotes rapid transcriptional reactivation following mitotic exit. Mol Cell 36 (6)

970–983.

8. ZaidiSK, YoungDW, MontecinoM, van WijnenAJ, SteinJL, et al. (2011) Bookmarking the genome: maintenance of epigenetic information. J Biol Chem 286 (21)

18355–18361.

9. ZhaoR, NakamuraT, FuY, LazarZ, SpectorDL (2011) Gene bookmarking accelerates the kinetics of post-mitotic transcriptional re-activation. Nat Cell Biol 13 (11)

1295–1304.

10. PirrottaV (1998) Polycombing the genome: PcG, trxG, and chromatin silencing. Cell 93: 333–336.

11. SimonJA, TamkunJW (2002) Programming off and on states in chromatin: mechanisms of Polycomb and trithorax group complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12 (2)

210–218.

12. RingroseL, ParoR (2004) Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins. Annu Rev Genet 38: 413–443.

13. GrimaudC, NegreN, CavalliG (2006) From genetics to epigenetics: the tale of Polycomb group and trithorax group genes. Chromosome Res 14 (4)

363–375.

14. SchuettengruberB, ChourroutD, VervoortM, LeblancB, CavalliG (2007) Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 128 (4)

735–745.

15. RichlyH, AloiaL, Di CroceL (2011) Roles of the Polycomb group proteins in stem cells and cancer. Cell Death Dis 2: e204.

16. MullerJ, VerrijzerP (2009) Biochemical mechanisms of gene regulation by polycomb group protein complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19 (2)

150–158.

17. SimonJA, KingstonRE (2009) Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10 (10)

697–708.

18. MullerJ, KassisJA (2006) Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16 (5)

476–484.

19. LanzuoloC, RoureV, DekkerJ, BantigniesF, OrlandoV (2007) Polycomb response elements mediate the formation of chromosome higher-order structures in the bithorax complex. Nat Cell Biol 9 (10)

1167–1174.

20. BantigniesF, CavalliG (2011) Polycomb group proteins: repression in 3D. Trends Genet 27: 454–464.

21. MoshkinYM, AlekseyenkoAA, SemeshinVF, SpiererA, SpiererP, et al. (2001) The Bithorax complex of Drosophile melanogaster: underreplication and morphology in polytene chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 570–574.

22. CometI, SchuettengruberB, SextonT, CavalliG (2011) A chromatin insulator driving three-dimensional Polycomb response element (PRE) contacts and Polycomb association with the chromatin fiber. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 (6)

2294–2299.

23. LiHB, MullerM, BahecharIA, KyrchanovaO, OhnoK, et al. (2011) Insulators, not Polycomb response elements, are required for long-range interactions between Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 31 (4)

616–625.

24. PirrottaV, LiHB (2012) A view of nuclear Polycomb bodies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22 (2)

101–109.

25. YangJ, CorcesVG (2012) Insulators, long-range interactions, and genome function. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22 (2)

86–92.

26. FrancisNJ, KingstonRE (2001) Mechanisms of transcriptional memory. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2 (6)

409–421.

27. BuchenauP, HodgsonJ, StruttH, Arndt-JovinDJ (1998) The distribution of Polycomb-group proteins during cell division and development in Drosophila embryos: impact on models for silencing. J Cell Biol 141 (2)

469–481.

28. FantiL, PerriniB, PiacentiniL, BerlocoM, MarchettiE, et al. (2008) The trithorax group and Pc group proteins are differentially involved in heterochromatin formation in Drosophila. Chromosoma 117 (1)

25–39.

29. BeckSA, FalconerE, CatchingA, HodgsonJW, BrockHW (2010) Cell cycle defects in polyhomeotic mutants are caused by abrogation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Dev Biol 339 (2)

320–328.

30. FonsecaJP, SteffenPA, MullerS, LuJ, SawickaA, et al. (2012) In vivo Polycomb kinetics and mitotic chromatin binding distinguish stem cells from differentiated cells. Genes Dev 26 (8)

857–871.

31. RowbothamSP, BarkiL, Neves-CostaA, SantosF, DeanW, et al. (2011) Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol Cell 42 (3)

285–296.

32. MendezJ, StillmanB (2000) Chromatin association of human origin recognition complex, cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins during the cell cycle: assembly of prereplication complexes in late mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 20 (22)

8602–8612.

33. KouskoutiA, TalianidisI (2005) Histone modifications defining active genes persist after transcriptional and mitotic inactivation. Embo J 24 (2)

347–357.

34. ZhangY, LiuT, MeyerCA, EeckhouteJ, JohnsonDS, et al. (2008) Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9 (9)

R137.

35. RastelliL, ChanCS, PirrottaV (1993) Related chromosome binding sites for zeste, suppressors of zeste and Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila and their dependence on Enhancer of zeste function. EMBO J 12: 1513–1522.

36. BeiselC, BunessA, Roustan-EspinosaIM, KochB, SchmittS, et al. (2007) Comparing active and repressed expression states of genes controlled by the Polycomb/Trithorax group proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (42)

16615–16620.

37. EnderleD, BeiselC, StadlerMB, GerstungM, AthriP, et al. (2011) Polycomb preferentially targets stalled promoters of coding and noncoding transcripts. Genome Res 21 (2)

216–226.

38. HoJW, BishopE, KarchenkoPV, NegreN, WhiteKP, et al. (2011) ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: lessons for experimental design and data analysis. BMC Genomics 12: 134.

39. Consortiumm (2010) Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 330 (6012)

1787–1797.

40. KharchenkoPV, AlekseyenkoAA, SchwartzYB, MinodaA, RiddleNC, et al. (2010) Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471 (7339)

480–485.

41. Huang daW, ShermanBT, LempickiRA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (1)

1–13.

42. Huang daW, ShermanBT, LempickiRA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4 (1)

44–57.

43. WoodAM, Van BortleK, RamosE, TakenakaN, RohrbaughM, et al. (2011) Regulation of chromatin organization and inducible gene expression by a Drosophila insulator. Mol Cell 44 (1)

29–38.

44. SextonT, YaffeE, KenigsbergE, BantigniesF, LeblancB, et al. (2012) Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome. Cell

45. LanzuoloC, Lo SardoF, DiamantiniA, OrlandoV (2011) PcG complexes set the stage for epigenetic inheritance of gene silencing in early S phase before replication. PLoS Genet 7: e1002370 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002370.

46. TolhuisB, BlomM, KerkhovenRM, PagieL, TeunissenH, et al. (2011) Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 7: e1001343 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001343.

47. GotoH, TomonoY, AjiroK, KosakoH, FujitaM, et al. (1999) Identification of a novel phosphorylation site on histone H3 coupled with mitotic chromosome condensation. J Biol Chem 274 (36)

25543–25549.

48. AotoT, SaitohN, SakamotoY, WatanabeS, NakaoM (2008) Polycomb group protein-associated chromatin is reproduced in post-mitotic G1 phase and is required for S phase progression. J Biol Chem 283 (27)

18905–18915.

49. LiZ, TatsukeT, SakashitaK, ZhuL, XuJ, et al. (2012) Identification and characterization of Polycomb group genes in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Mol Biol Rep 39 (5)

5575–5588.

50. PetrukS, SedkovY, JohnstonDM, HodgsonJW, BlackKL, et al. (2012) TrxG and PcG Proteins but Not Methylated Histones Remain Associated with DNA through Replication. Cell 150 (5)

922–933.

51. MartinEC, AdlerPN (1993) The Polycomb group gene Posterior Sex Combs encodes a chromosomal protein. Development 117: 641–655.

52. SuralTH, PengS, LiB, WorkmanJL, ParkPJ, et al. (2008) The MSL3 chromodomain directs a key targeting step for dosage compensation of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15 (12)

1318–1325.

53. GelbartME, KurodaMI (2009) Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome. Development 136 (9)

1399–1410.

54. StrukovYG, SuralTH, KurodaMI, SedatJW (2011) Evidence of activity-specific, radial organization of mitotic chromosomes in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 9: e1000574 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000574.

55. Van BortleK, RamosE, TakenakaN, YangJ, WahiJ, et al. (2012) Drosophila CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at the borders of H3K27me3 domains. Genome Res

56. GerasimovaTI, CorcesVG (1998) Polycomb and trithorax group proteins mediate the function of a chromatin insulator. Cell 92 (4)

511–521.

57. BantigniesF, RoureV, CometI, LeblancB, SchuettengruberB, et al. (2011) Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144 (2)

214–226.

58. HansenKH, BrackenAP, PasiniD, DietrichN, GehaniSS, et al. (2008) A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nat Cell Biol 10 (11)

1291–1300.

59. VonckenJW, SchweizerD, AagaardL, SattlerL, JantschMF, et al. (1999) Chromatin-association of the Polycomb group protein BMI1 is cell cycle-regulated and correlates with its phosphorylation status. J Cell Sci 112 (Pt 24)

4627–4639.

60. ChenS, BohrerLR, RaiAN, PanY, GanL, et al. (2010) Cyclin-dependent kinases regulate epigenetic gene silencing through phosphorylation of EZH2. Nat Cell Biol 12 (11)

1108–1114.

61. KanekoS, LiG, SonJ, XuCF, MargueronR, et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of the PRC2 component Ezh2 is cell cycle-regulated and up-regulates its binding to ncRNA. Genes Dev 24 (23)

2615–2620.

62. WeiY, ChenYH, LiLY, LangJ, YehSP, et al. (2011) CDK1-dependent phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of H3K27 and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 13 (1)

87–94.

63. WuSC, ZhangY (2011) Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1)-mediated phosphorylation of enhancer of zeste 2 (Ezh2) regulates its stability. J Biol Chem 286 (32)

28511–28519.

64. ZengX, ChenS, HuangH (2011) Phosphorylation of EZH2 by CDK1 and CDK2: a possible regulatory mechanism of transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark through cell divisions. Cell Cycle 10 (4)

579–583.

65. ZhangH, NiuB, HuJF, GeS, WangH, et al. (2011) Interruption of intrachromosomal looping by CCCTC binding factor decoy proteins abrogates genomic imprinting of human insulin-like growth factor II. J Cell Biol 193 (3)

475–487.

66. KadaukeS, UdugamaMI, PawlickiJM, AchtmanJC, JainDP, et al. (2012) Tissue-Specific Mitotic Bookmarking by Hematopoietic Transcription Factor GATA1. Cell 150 (4)

725–737.

67. FrancisNJ, FollmerNE, SimonMD, AghiaG, ButlerJD (2009) Polycomb Proteins Remain Bound to Chromatin and DNA during DNA Replication In Vitro. Cell 110–122.

68. PappB, MullerJ (2006) Histone trimethylation and the maintenance of transcriptional ON and OFF states by trxG and PcG proteins. Genes Dev 20 (15)

2041–2054.

69. WangL, BrownJL, CaoR, ZhangY, KassisJA, et al. (2004) Hierarchical recruitment of polycomb group silencing complexes. Mol Cell 14: 637–646.

70. YamamotoY, GirardF, BelloB, AffolterM, GehringWJ (1997) The cramped gene of Drosophila is a member of the Polycomb-group, and interacts with mus209, the gene encoding Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen. Development 124: 3385–3394.

71. PetrukS, SedkovY, SmithS, TillibS, KraevskiV, et al. (2001) Trithorax and dCBP acting in a complex to maintain expression of a homeotic gene. Science 294: 1331–1334.

72. FollmerNE, FrancisNJ (accepted for publication) Preparation of Drosophila tissue culture cells from different stages of the cell cycle for chromatin immunoprecipitation using centrifugal counterflow elutriation and fluorescence-activate cell sorting. Methods in Enzymology

73. LangmeadB, TrapnellC, PopM, SalzbergSL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10 (3)

R25.

74. GiardineB, RiemerC, HardisonRC, BurhansR, ElnitskiL, et al. (2005) Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res 15 (10)

1451–1455.

75. BlankenbergD, Von KusterG, CoraorN, AnandaG, LazarusR, et al. (2010) Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 19: Unit 19 10 11–21.

76. GoecksJ, NekrutenkoA, TaylorJ (2010) Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol 11 (8)

R86.

77. YeT, KrebsAR, ChoukrallahMA, KeimeC, PlewniakF, et al. (2011) seqMINER: an integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform. Nucleic Acids Res 39 (6)

e35.

78. Perez-LlamasC, Lopez-BigasN (2011) Gitools: analysis and visualisation of genomic data using interactive heat-maps. PLoS ONE 6: e19541 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019541.

79. ShinH, LiuT, ManraiAK, LiuXS (2009) CEAS: cis-regulatory element annotation system. Bioinformatics 25 (19)

2605–2606.

80. SchwartzYB, KahnTG, NixDA, LiXY, BourgonR, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 38 (6)

700–705.

81. MitoY, HenikoffJG, HenikoffS (2005) Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns. Nat Genet 37 (10)

1090–1097.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#