#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Averting Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in India through Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation: An Economic-Epidemiologic Modeling Study


Background:
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been proposed in high-income countries to reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes. We sought to estimate the potential health effects of such a fiscal strategy in the middle-income country of India, where there is heterogeneity in SSB consumption, patterns of substitution between SSBs and other beverages after tax increases, and vast differences in chronic disease risk within the population.

Methods and Findings:
Using consumption and price variations data from a nationally representative survey of 100,855 Indian households, we first calculated how changes in SSB price alter per capita consumption of SSBs and substitution with other beverages. We then incorporated SSB sales trends, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes incidence data stratified by age, sex, income, and urban/rural residence into a validated microsimulation of caloric consumption, glycemic load, overweight/obesity prevalence, and type 2 diabetes incidence among Indian subpopulations facing a 20% SSB excise tax. The 20% SSB tax was anticipated to reduce overweight and obesity prevalence by 3.0% (95% CI 1.6%–5.9%) and type 2 diabetes incidence by 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–1.9%) among various Indian subpopulations over the period 2014–2023, if SSB consumption continued to increase linearly in accordance with secular trends. However, acceleration in SSB consumption trends consistent with industry marketing models would be expected to increase the impact efficacy of taxation, averting 4.2% of prevalent overweight/obesity (95% CI 2.5–10.0%) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.0–2.8%) of incident type 2 diabetes from 2014–2023. Given current consumption and BMI distributions, our results suggest the largest relative effect would be expected among young rural men, refuting our a priori hypothesis that urban populations would be isolated beneficiaries of SSB taxation. Key limitations of this estimation approach include the assumption that consumer expenditure behavior from prior years, captured in price elasticities, will reflect future behavior among consumers, and potential underreporting of consumption in dietary recall data used to inform our calculations.

Conclusion:
Sustained SSB taxation at a high tax rate could mitigate rising obesity and type 2 diabetes in India among both urban and rural subpopulations.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Averting Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in India through Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation: An Economic-Epidemiologic Modeling Study. PLoS Med 11(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001582
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001582

Souhrn

Background:
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been proposed in high-income countries to reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes. We sought to estimate the potential health effects of such a fiscal strategy in the middle-income country of India, where there is heterogeneity in SSB consumption, patterns of substitution between SSBs and other beverages after tax increases, and vast differences in chronic disease risk within the population.

Methods and Findings:
Using consumption and price variations data from a nationally representative survey of 100,855 Indian households, we first calculated how changes in SSB price alter per capita consumption of SSBs and substitution with other beverages. We then incorporated SSB sales trends, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes incidence data stratified by age, sex, income, and urban/rural residence into a validated microsimulation of caloric consumption, glycemic load, overweight/obesity prevalence, and type 2 diabetes incidence among Indian subpopulations facing a 20% SSB excise tax. The 20% SSB tax was anticipated to reduce overweight and obesity prevalence by 3.0% (95% CI 1.6%–5.9%) and type 2 diabetes incidence by 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–1.9%) among various Indian subpopulations over the period 2014–2023, if SSB consumption continued to increase linearly in accordance with secular trends. However, acceleration in SSB consumption trends consistent with industry marketing models would be expected to increase the impact efficacy of taxation, averting 4.2% of prevalent overweight/obesity (95% CI 2.5–10.0%) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.0–2.8%) of incident type 2 diabetes from 2014–2023. Given current consumption and BMI distributions, our results suggest the largest relative effect would be expected among young rural men, refuting our a priori hypothesis that urban populations would be isolated beneficiaries of SSB taxation. Key limitations of this estimation approach include the assumption that consumer expenditure behavior from prior years, captured in price elasticities, will reflect future behavior among consumers, and potential underreporting of consumption in dietary recall data used to inform our calculations.

Conclusion:
Sustained SSB taxation at a high tax rate could mitigate rising obesity and type 2 diabetes in India among both urban and rural subpopulations.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. MalikVS, SchulzeMB, HuFB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84: 274–288.

2. MalikVS, PopkinBM, BrayGA, DesprésJ-P, WillettWC, et al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 33: 2477–2483.

3. SchulzeMB, MansonJAE, LudwigDS, ColditzGA, StampferMJ, et al. (2004) Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292: 927–934.

4. The InterAct consortium (2013) Consumption of sweet beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in European adults: results from EPIC-InterAct. Diabetologia 56: 1520–1530.

5. BrownellKD, FarleyT, WillettWC, PopkinBM, ChaloupkaFJ, et al. (2009) The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N Engl J Med 361: 1599–1605.

6. Basu S, McKee M, Galea G, Stuckler D (2013) Relationship of soft drink consumption to global overweight, obesity, and diabetes: a cross-national analysis of 75 countries. Am J Public Health: e1–e7.

7. KleimanS, NgSW, PopkinB (2012) Drinking to our health: can beverage companies cut calories while maintaining profits? Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes 13: 258–274.

8. BarqueraS, Hernandez-BarreraL, TolentinoML, EspinosaJ, NgSW, et al. (2008) Energy intake from beverages is increasing among Mexican adolescents and adults. J Nutr 138: 2454–2461.

9. Euromonitor International (2013) Passport Global Market Information Database. New York: Euromonitor.

10. BasuS, StucklerD, McKeeM, GaleaG (2012) Nutritional determinants of worldwide diabetes: an econometric study of food markets and diabetes prevalence in 173 countries. Public Health Nutr 1: 1–8.

11. BasuS, YoffeP, HillsN, LustigRH (2013) The relationship of sugar to population-level diabetes prevalence: an econometric analysis of repeated cross-sectional data. PLoS ONE 8: e57873 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057873

12. FinkelsteinEA, ZhenC, NonnemakerJ, ToddJE (2010) Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households. Arch Intern Med 170: 2028–2034.

13. PowellLM, ChaloupkaFJ (2009) Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies. Milbank Q 87: 229–257.

14. SturmR, PowellLM, ChriquiJF, ChaloupkaFJ (2010) Soda taxes, soft drink consumption, and children's body mass index. Health Aff (Millwood) 29: 1052–1058.

15. WangYC, CoxsonP, ShenYM, GoldmanL, Bibbins-DomingoK (2012) A Penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would cut health and cost burdens of diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood) 31: 199–207.

16. BriggsADM, MyttonOT, KehlbacherA, TiffinR, RaynerM, et al. (2013) Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ 347: f6189.

17. EbrahimS, PearceN, SmeethL, CasasJP, JaffarS, et al. (2013) Tackling non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: is the evidence from high-income countries all we need? PLoS Med 10: e1001377 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001377

18. PopkinBM, AdairLS, NgSW (2012) Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev 70: 3–21.

19. ReardonT, TimmerCP, MintenB (2012) Supermarket revolution in Asia and emerging development strategies to include small farmers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 12332–12337.

20. BansalD, SatijaA, KhandpurN, BowenL, KinraS, et al. (2010) Effects of migration on food consumption patterns in a sample of Indian factory workers and their families. Public Health Nutr 13: 1982–1989.

21. SubramanianS, CorsiDJ, SubramanyamMA, Davey SmithG (2013) Jumping the gun: the problematic discourse on socioeconomic status and cardiovascular health in India. Int J Epidemiol 42: 1410–1426.

22. VellakkalS, SubramaniaSV, MillettC, BasuS, StucklerD, et al. (n.d.) Socioeconomic inequalities in non-communicable diseases prevalence in India: disparities between self-reported diagnoses and standardized measures. PLoS ONE 8: e68219 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068219

23. DeepaM, AnjanaRM, ManjulaD, NarayanKMV, MohanV (2011) Convergence of prevalence rates of diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors in middle and low income groups in urban India: 10-year follow-up of the Chennai Urban Population Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5: 918–927.

24. FletcherJM, FrisvoldDE, TefftN (2010) The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes. J Public Econ 94: 967–974.

25. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (2012) National Sample Survey. Delhi: Government of India.

26. World Health Organization (2012) WHO Global InfoBase.Geneva: WHO.

27. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.

28. US Department of Agriculture (2013) National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Release 25. Washington (D.C.): National Agricultural Library.

29. Gopalan C, Sastri BVR, Balasubramanian SC (1971) Nutritive value of Indian foods. Hyderabad: Hyderabad Natl Inst Nutr.

30. OECD (2013) Main Economic Indicators - complete database. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/data-00052-en. Accessed 9 June 2013.

31. EbrahimS, KinraS, BowenL, AndersenE, Ben-ShlomoY, et al. (2010) The effect of rural-to-urban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 7: e1000268 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000268

32. BanksJ, BlundellR, LewbelA (1997) Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stat 79: 527–539.

33. ShonkwilerJS, YenST (1999) Two-step estimation of a censored system of equations. Am J Agric Econ 81: 972–982.

34. HainesPS, GuilkeyDK, PopkinBM (1988) Modeling Food Consumption Decisions as a Two-Step Process. Am J Agric Econ 70: 543–552.

35. PollakRA, WalesTJ (1978) Estimation of complete demand systems from household budget data: the linear and quadratic expenditure systems. Am Econ Rev 68: 348–359.

36. AndreyevaT, LongMW, BrownellKD (2010) The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health 100: 216–222.

37. DharmasenaS, CappsO (2012) Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the US obesity problem. Health Econ 21: 669–694.

38. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2007) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3). Mumbai: IIPS.

39. World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators. Washington (D.C.): IBRD.

40. CaroJJ, BriggsAH, SiebertU, KuntzKM (2012) Modeling Good Research Practices—Overview A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–1. Med Decis Making 32: 667–677.

41. SadikotSM, NigamA, DasS, BajajS, ZargarAH, et al. (2004) The burden of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India using the WHO 1999 criteria: prevalence of diabetes in India study (PODIS). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 66: 301–307.

42. DanaeiG, FinucaneMM, LuY, SinghGM, CowanMJ, et al. (2011) National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet 378: 31–40.

43. BassFM (2004) Comments on “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables The Bass Model.”. Manag Sci 50: 1833–1840.

44. Food and Agricultural Organization (2013) FAOSTAT database. Rome: United Nations.

45. AtkinsonFS, Foster-PowellK, Brand-MillerJC (2008) International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008. Diabetes Care 31: 2281–2283.

46. HallKD, SacksG, ChandramohanD, ChowCC, WangYC, et al. (2011) Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 378: 826–837.

47. HallKD, JordanPN (2008) Modeling weight-loss maintenance to help prevent body weight regain. Am J Clin Nutr 88: 1495–1503.

48. LimSS, GazianoTA, GakidouE, ReddyKS, FarzadfarF, et al. (2007) Prevention of cardiovascular disease in high-risk individuals in low-income and middle-income countries: health effects and costs. Lancet 370: 2054–2062.

49. CDC (n.d.) CDC's Diabetes Program - Data & Trends - Duration of Diabetes - Distribution of Diabetes Duration Among Adults Aged 18–79 Years, United States, 1997–2009. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/duration/fig2.htm. Accessed 19 December 2012.

50. LiveseyG, TaylorR, LiveseyH, LiuS (2013) Is there a dose-response relation of dietary glycemic load to risk of type 2 diabetes? Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 97: 584–596.

51. BremerAA, Mietus-SnyderM, LustigRH (2012) Toward a unifying hypothesis of metabolic syndrome. Pediatrics 129: 557–570.

52. TeffKL, GrudziakJ, TownsendRR, DunnTN, GrantRW, et al. (2009) Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals in obese men and women: influence of insulin resistance on plasma triglyceride responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 1562–1569.

53. Indian Consensus Group (1996) Indian consensus for prevention of hypertension and coronary heart disease. A joint scientific statement of Indian Society of Hypertension and International College of Nutrition. J Nutr Env Med 6: 309–318.

54. ChiuM, AustinPC, ManuelDG, ShahBR, TuJV (2011) Deriving ethnic-specific BMI cutoff points for assessing diabetes risk. Diabetes Care 34: 1741–1748.

55. Registrar General & Census Commissioner (2011) Census of India. Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.

56. TuahNA, AmielC, QureshiS, CarJ, KaurB, et al. (2011) Transtheoretical model for dietary and physical exercise modification in weight loss management for overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD008066.

57. ShawK, O'RourkeP, Del MarC, KenardyJ (2005) Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003818.

58. WatersE, de Silva SanigorskiA, HallBJ, BrownT, CampbellKJ, et al. (2012) Interventions for preventing obesity in children (review). Cochrane Collab 1–212.

59. ThomasDE, ElliottEJ, BaurL (2007) Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Online CD005105.

60. Prevention I of M (US) C on AP in O, Glickman D (2012) Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: Solving the Weight of the Nation. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press.

61. World Health Organization (2011) United Nations high-level meeting on noncommunicable disease prevention and control. Geneva: WHO.

62. BasuS, BabiarzKS, EbrahimS, VellakkalS, StucklerD, et al. (2013) Palm oil taxes and cardiovascular disease mortality in India: economic-epidemiologic model. BMJ 347: f6048.

63. EylesH, MhurchuCN, NghiemN, BlakelyT (2012) Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies. PLoS Med 9: e1001353 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353

64. MisraA, KhuranaL (2009) The metabolic syndrome in South Asians: epidemiology, determinants, and prevention. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 7: 497–514.

65. MisraA, VikramNK (2004) Insulin resistance syndrome (metabolic syndrome) and obesity in Asian Indians: evidence and implications. Nutr Burbank Los Angeles Cty Calif 20: 482–491.

66. BhatDS, YajnikCS, SayyadMG, RautKN, LubreeHG, et al. (2005) Body fat measurement in Indian men: comparison of three methods based on a two-compartment model. Int J Obes 2005 29: 842–848.

67. Deurenberg-YapM, SchmidtG, van StaverenWA, DeurenbergP (2000) The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord J Int Assoc Study Obes 24: 1011–1017.

68. KesavachandranCN, BihariV, MathurN (2012) The normal range of body mass index with high body fat percentage among male residents of Lucknow city in north India. Indian J Med Res 135: 72–77.

69. BazzanoLA, LiTY, JoshipuraKJ, HuFB (2008) Intake of fruit, vegetables, and fruit juices and risk of diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 31: 1311–1317.

70. De Koning L, Malik VS, Kellogg MD, Rimm EB, Willett WC, et al.. (2012) Sweetened beverage consumption, incident coronary heart disease, and biomarkers of risk in men. Circulation 125: : 1735–1741, S1.

71. De KoningL, MalikVS, RimmEB, WillettWC, HuFB (2011) Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr 93: 1321–1327.

72. DuffeyKJ, SteffenLM, Van HornL, JacobsDRJr, PopkinBM (2012) Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 95: 909–915.

73. De RuyterJC, OlthofMR, SeidellJC, KatanMB (2012) A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 367: 1397–1406.

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2014 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#