#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Quantifying the Impoverishing Effects of Purchasing Medicines: A Cross-Country Comparison of the Affordability of Medicines in the Developing World


Background:
Increasing attention is being paid to the affordability of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs) where medicines are often highly priced in relation to income levels. The impoverishing effect of medicine purchases can be estimated by determining pre- and postpayment incomes, which are then compared to a poverty line. Here we estimate the impoverishing effects of four medicines in 16 LICs and MICs using the impoverishment method as a metric of affordability.

Methods and Findings:
Affordability was assessed in terms of the proportion of the population being pushed below US$1.25 or US$2 per day poverty levels because of the purchase of medicines. The prices of salbutamol 100 mcg/dose inhaler, glibenclamide 5 mg cap/tab, atenolol 50 mg cap/tab, and amoxicillin 250 mg cap/tab were obtained from facility-based surveys undertaken using a standard measurement methodology. The World Bank's World Development Indicators provided household expenditure data and information on income distributions. In the countries studied, purchasing these medicines would impoverish large portions of the population (up to 86%). Originator brand products were less affordable than the lowest-priced generic equivalents. In the Philippines, for example, originator brand atenolol would push an additional 22% of the population below US$1.25 per day, whereas for the lowest priced generic equivalent this demographic shift is 7%. Given related prevalence figures, substantial numbers of people are affected by the unaffordability of medicines.

Conclusions:
Comparing medicine prices to available income in LICs and MICs shows that medicine purchases by individuals in those countries could lead to the impoverishment of large numbers of people. Action is needed to improve medicine affordability, such as promoting the use of quality assured, low-priced generics, and establishing health insurance systems.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Quantifying the Impoverishing Effects of Purchasing Medicines: A Cross-Country Comparison of the Affordability of Medicines in the Developing World. PLoS Med 7(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000333
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000333

Souhrn

Background:
Increasing attention is being paid to the affordability of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs) where medicines are often highly priced in relation to income levels. The impoverishing effect of medicine purchases can be estimated by determining pre- and postpayment incomes, which are then compared to a poverty line. Here we estimate the impoverishing effects of four medicines in 16 LICs and MICs using the impoverishment method as a metric of affordability.

Methods and Findings:
Affordability was assessed in terms of the proportion of the population being pushed below US$1.25 or US$2 per day poverty levels because of the purchase of medicines. The prices of salbutamol 100 mcg/dose inhaler, glibenclamide 5 mg cap/tab, atenolol 50 mg cap/tab, and amoxicillin 250 mg cap/tab were obtained from facility-based surveys undertaken using a standard measurement methodology. The World Bank's World Development Indicators provided household expenditure data and information on income distributions. In the countries studied, purchasing these medicines would impoverish large portions of the population (up to 86%). Originator brand products were less affordable than the lowest-priced generic equivalents. In the Philippines, for example, originator brand atenolol would push an additional 22% of the population below US$1.25 per day, whereas for the lowest priced generic equivalent this demographic shift is 7%. Given related prevalence figures, substantial numbers of people are affected by the unaffordability of medicines.

Conclusions:
Comparing medicine prices to available income in LICs and MICs shows that medicine purchases by individuals in those countries could lead to the impoverishment of large numbers of people. Action is needed to improve medicine affordability, such as promoting the use of quality assured, low-priced generics, and establishing health insurance systems.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. World Health Organization 2000 Global comparative pharmaceutical expenditures with related reference information. Health Economics and Drugs EDM Series No. 3 Geneva World Health Organization

2. World Health Organization 2004 WHO medicines strategy 2004–2007 - countries at the core. Available: http://www.who.int/medicinedocs/collect/medicinedocs/pdf/s5416e/s5416e.pdf Accessed 28 April 2009

3. van DoorslaerE

O'DonnellO

Rannan-EliyaRP

SomanathanA

AdhikariSR

2006 Effect of payments for health care on poverty estimates in 11 countries in Asia: an analysis of household survey data. Lancet 368 1357 1364

4. CameronA

EwenM

Ross-DegnanD

BallD

LaingR

2009 Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis. Lancet 373 240 249

5. DrorDM

PrekerAS

JakabM

2002 The role of communities in combating social exclusion.

DrorDM

PrekerAS

Social reinsurance - a new approach to sustainable community health financing Washington (D.C.); Geneva The World Bank Group and the International Labour Office

6. World Health Organization 2008 Access to medicines. Available: http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story002/en/ Accessed 22 April 2009

7. United Nations 1948 The universal declaration of human rights, article 25. Available: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html#a25. Accessed 22 April 2009

8. United Nations 1966 International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, article 12. Geneva. Available: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm. Accessed 22 April 2009

9. World Health Organization, Health Action International 2008 Measuring medicine prices, availability, affordability and price components – 2nd edition Geneva World Health Organization

10. NiënsLM

BrouwerWB

2009 Better measures of affordability required. Lancet 373 1081 author reply 1081–1082

11. NiënsLM

Van de PoelE

CameronA

EwenM

LaingR

2009 Practical measurement of affordability: an application to medicines Rotterdam Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Working Paper W2009.02

12. HancockKE

1993 ‘Can pay? won't pay?’ or economic principles of ‘Affordability’. Urban Stud 30 127 145

13. KuttyNK

2005 A new measure of housing affordability: estimates and analytical results. Hous Policy Debate 16 113 142

14. BundorfMK

PaulyMV

2006 Is health insurance affordable for the uninsured? J Health Econ 25 650 673

15. ChenS

RavallionM

2008 The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty Washington (D.C.) Development Research Group, The World Bank Group

16. The World Bank Group. Available: http://go.worldbank.org/C9GR27WRJ0. Accessed 10 January 2010

17. Health Action International. Medicine prices. Available: http://www.haiweb.org/medicineprices/. Accessed 5 March 2009

18. The World Bank Group. World development indicators. Available: http://publications.worldbank.org/WDI/. Accessed 12 March 2009

19. O'DonnellO

van DoorslaerE

WagstaffA

LindelowM

2008 Analyzing health equity using household survey data – A guide to techniques and their implementation Washington (D.C.) The World Bank Group

20. The Economist. The economist intelligence unit. Available: http://www.eiu.com/. Accessed 2 April 2009

21. The World Bank Group. Country groups. Available: http://go.worldbank.org/D7SN0B8YU0. Accessed 16 March 2009

22. FloresG

KrishnakumarJ

O'DonnellO

van DoorslaerE

2008 Coping with health-care costs: implications for the measurement of catastrophic expenditures and poverty. Health Econ 17 1393 1412

23. World Health Organization 2008 WHO model formulary. Available: http://www.who.int/selection_medicines/list/WMF2008.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2009

24. United Nations Development Program 2008 Human development report 2007/2008. Available: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_Tables.pdf. Accessed 19 February 2009

25. LiptonM

RavaillonM

1994 Povert and policy.

BehrmanJ

SrinivasanTN

Handbook of development economics Amsterdam: Elsevier

26. World Health Organization 2004 Global burden of disease - 2004 update. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html. Accessed 12 February 2010

27. WaningB

KaplanW

KingAC

LawrenceDA

LeufkensHG

2009 Global strategies to reduce the price of antiretroviral medicines: evidence from transactional databases. Bull World Health Organ 87 520

28. World Health Organization 2006 Public health innovation and intellectual property rights. report of the commission on intellectual property rights, innovation, and public health Geneva World Health Organization

29. SeimL

2007 Thailand: government issues compulsory licences for HIV/AIDS drugs. HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev 12 28 29

30. FordN

WilsonD

Costa ChavesG

LotrowskaM

KijtiwatchakulK

2007 Sustaining access to antiretroviral therapy in the less-developed world: lessons from brazil and Thailand. AIDS (London) 21 S21 S29

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2010 Číslo 8
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#