For most organisms, chromosome segregation during meiosis relies on deliberate induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and repair of a subset of these DSBs as inter-homolog crossovers (COs). However, timing and levels of DSB formation must be tightly controlled to avoid jeopardizing genome integrity. Here we identify the DSB-2 protein, which is required for efficient DSB formation during C. elegans meiosis but is dispensable for later steps of meiotic recombination. DSB-2 localizes to chromatin during the time of DSB formation, and its disappearance coincides with a decline in RAD-51 foci marking early recombination intermediates and precedes appearance of COSA-1 foci marking CO-designated sites. These and other data suggest that DSB-2 and its paralog DSB-1 promote competence for DSB formation. Further, immunofluorescence analyses of wild-type gonads and various meiotic mutants reveal that association of DSB-2 with chromatin is coordinated with multiple distinct aspects of the meiotic program, including the phosphorylation state of nuclear envelope protein SUN-1 and dependence on RAD-50 to load the RAD-51 recombinase at DSB sites. Moreover, association of DSB-2 with chromatin is prolonged in mutants impaired for either DSB formation or formation of downstream CO intermediates. These and other data suggest that association of DSB-2 with chromatin is an indicator of competence for DSB formation, and that cells respond to a deficit of CO-competent recombination intermediates by prolonging the DSB-competent state. In the context of this model, we propose that formation of sufficient CO-competent intermediates engages a negative feedback response that leads to cessation of DSB formation as part of a major coordinated transition in meiotic prophase progression. The proposed negative feedback regulation of DSB formation simultaneously (1) ensures that sufficient DSBs are made to guarantee CO formation and (2) prevents excessive DSB levels that could have deleterious effects.
Vyšlo v časopise: The DSB-2 Protein Reveals a Regulatory Network that Controls Competence for Meiotic DSB Formation and Promotes Crossover Assurance. PLoS Genet 9(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003674 Kategorie: Research Article prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003674
1. KeeneyS (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52 : 1–53.
2. PageSL, HawleyRS (2003) Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet. Science 301 : 785–789.
3. KeeneyS (2008) Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis. Genome Dyn Stab 2 : 81–123.
4. KumarR, BourbonHM, de MassyB (2010) Functional conservation of Mei4 for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation from yeasts to mice. Genes Dev 24 : 1266–1280.
5. LakeCM, NielsenRJ, HawleyRS (2011) The Drosophila zinc finger protein trade embargo is required for double strand break formation in meiosis. PLoS Genet 7: e1002005.
6. HayashiM, ChinGM, VilleneuveAM (2007) C. elegans germ cells switch between distinct modes of double-strand break repair during meiotic prophase progression. PLoS Genet 3: e191.
7. BaudrimontA, PenknerA, WoglarA, MamnunYM, HulekM, et al. (2011) A new thermosensitive smc-3 allele reveals involvement of cohesin in homologous recombination in C. elegans. PLoS One 6: e24799.
8. ReddyKC, VilleneuveAM (2004) C. elegans HIM-17 links chromatin modification and competence for initiation of meiotic recombination. Cell 118 : 439–452.
9. WagnerCR, KuerversL, BaillieDL, YanowitzJL (2010) xnd-1 regulates the global recombination landscape in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 467 : 839–843.
10. MeneelyPM, McGovernOL, HeinisFI, YanowitzJL (2012) Crossover distribution and frequency are regulated by him-5 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 190 : 1251–1266.
11. StamperEL, RodenbuschSE, RosuS, AhringerJ, VilleneuveAM, et al. (2013) Identification of DSB-1, a protein required for initiation of meiotic recombination in C. elegans, illuminates a checkpoint that promotes crossover assurance. PLoS Genet In press.
12. TravenA, HeierhorstJ (2005) SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. Bioessays 27 : 397–407.
13. YokooR, ZawadzkiKA, NabeshimaK, DrakeM, ArurS, et al. (2012) COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149 : 75–87.
14. DernburgAF, McDonaldK, MoulderG, BarsteadR, DresserM, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94 : 387–398.
15. MacQueenAJ, PhillipsCM, BhallaN, WeiserP, VilleneuveAM, et al. (2005) Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 123 : 1037–1050.
16. PhillipsCM, WongC, BhallaN, CarltonPM, WeiserP, et al. (2005) HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123 : 1051–1063.
17. ZetkaMC, KawasakiI, StromeS, MullerF (1999) Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13 : 2258–2270.
18. MacQueenAJ, ColaiacovoMP, McDonaldK, VilleneuveAM (2002) Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev 16 : 2428–2442.
19. KeeneyS, GirouxCN, KlecknerN (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88 : 375–384.
20. AlpiA, PasierbekP, GartnerA, LoidlJ (2003) Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 112 : 6–16.
21. ColaiacovoMP, MacQueenAJ, Martinez-PerezE, McDonaldK, AdamoA, et al. (2003) Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell 5 : 463–474.
22. KellyKO, DernburgAF, StanfieldGM, VilleneuveAM (2000) Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156 : 617–630.
23. PenknerAM, FridkinA, GloggnitzerJ, BaudrimontA, MachacekT, et al. (2009) Meiotic chromosome homology search involves modifications of the nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1. Cell 139 : 920–933.
24. PenknerA, TangL, NovatchkovaM, LadurnerM, FridkinA, et al. (2007) The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 12 : 873–885.
25. SatoA, IsaacB, PhillipsCM, RilloR, CarltonPM, et al. (2009) Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 139 : 907–919.
26. WoglarA, DaryabeigiA, AdamoA, HabacherC, MachacekT, et al. (2013) Matefin/SUN-1 phosphorylation is part of a surveillance mechanism to coordinate chromosome synapsis and recombination with meiotic progression and chromosome movement. PLoS Genet 9: e1003335.
27. MacQueenAJ, VilleneuveAM (2001) Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev 15 : 1674–1687.
28. WynneDJ, RogO, CarltonPM, DernburgAF (2012) Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. J Cell Biol 196 : 47–64.
29. TangL, MachacekT, MamnunYM, PenknerA, GloggnitzerJ, et al. (2010) Mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans him-19 show meiotic defects that worsen with age. Mol Biol Cell 21 : 885–896.
30. ChinGM, VilleneuveAM (2001) C. elegans mre-11 is required for meiotic recombination and DNA repair but is dispensable for the meiotic G(2) DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 15 : 522–534.
31. MetsDG, MeyerBJ (2009) Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 139 : 73–86.
32. JantschV, PasierbekP, MuellerMM, SchweizerD, JantschM, et al. (2004) Targeted gene knockout reveals a role in meiotic recombination for ZHP-3, a Zip3-related protein in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Cell Biol 24 : 7998–8006.
33. BaudrimontA, PenknerA, WoglarA, MachacekT, WegrostekC, et al. (2010) Leptotene/zygotene chromosome movement via the SUN/KASH protein bridge in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 6: e1001219.
34. Martinez-PerezE, VilleneuveAM (2005) HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. Genes Dev 19 : 2727–2743.
35. CouteauF, ZetkaM (2005) HTP-1 coordinates synaptonemal complex assembly with homolog alignment during meiosis in C. elegans. Genes Dev 19 : 2744–2756.
36. GoodyerW, KaitnaS, CouteauF, WardJD, BoultonSJ, et al. (2008) HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 14 : 263–274.
37. SeversonAF, LingL, van ZuylenV, MeyerBJ (2009) The axial element protein HTP-3 promotes cohesin loading and meiotic axis assembly in C. elegans to implement the meiotic program of chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 23 : 1763–1778.
38. SmolikovS, EizingerA, HurlburtA, RogersE, VilleneuveAM, et al. (2007) Synapsis-defective mutants reveal a correlation between chromosome conformation and the mode of double-strand break repair during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 176 : 2027–2033.
39. RosuS, LibudaDE, VilleneuveAM (2011) Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number. Science 334 : 1286–1289.
40. BesslerJB, ReddyKC, HayashiM, HodgkinJ, VilleneuveAM (2007) A role for Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 in the proliferation vs. meiotic entry decision. Genetics 175 : 2029–2037.
41. JoyceEF, PedersenM, TiongS, White-BrownSK, PaulA, et al. (2011) Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair. J Cell Biol 195 : 359–367.
42. ZhangL, KimKP, KlecknerNE, StorlazziA (2011) Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 : 20036–20041.
43. LangeJ, PanJ, ColeF, ThelenMP, JasinM, et al. (2011) ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 479 : 237–240.
44. AhnJ, UristM, PrivesC (2004) The Chk2 protein kinase. DNA Repair (Amst) 3 : 1039–1047.
45. LimJG, StineRR, YanowitzJL (2008) Domain-specific regulation of recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans in response to temperature, age and sex. Genetics 180 : 715–726.
46. Jaramillo-LambertA, EllefsonM, VilleneuveAM, EngebrechtJ (2007) Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line. Dev Biol 308 : 206–221.
47. Rosu S (2012) Regulation of meiotic recombination: DNA double-strand break formation and repair in C. elegans [PhD thesis]. Stanford (California): Department of Genetics, Stanford University. Available: http://purl.stanford.edu/qz167mc2859.
48. VilleneuveAM (1994) A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136 : 887–902.
49. WicksSR, YehRT, GishWR, WaterstonRH, PlasterkRH (2001) Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map. Nat Genet 28 : 160–164.
50. DavisMW, HammarlundM, HarrachT, HullettP, OlsenS, et al. (2005) Rapid single nucleotide polymorphism mapping in C. elegans. BMC Genomics 6 : 118.
51. FraserAG, KamathRS, ZipperlenP, Martinez-CamposM, SohrmannM, et al. (2000) Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 408 : 325–330.
52. KamathRS, AhringerJ (2003) Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 30 : 313–321.
53. WignallSM, VilleneuveAM (2009) Lateral microtubule bundles promote chromosome alignment during acentrosomal oocyte meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 11 : 839–844.
54. HayashiM, Mlynarczyk-EvansS, VilleneuveAM (2010) The synaptonemal complex shapes the crossover landscape through cooperative assembly, crossover promotion and crossover inhibition during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 186 : 45–58.
55. NabeshimaK, VilleneuveAM, HillersKJ (2004) Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes. Genetics 168 : 1275–1292.
56. RinaldoC, EderleS, RoccoV, La VolpeA (1998) The Caenorhabditis elegans RAD51 homolog is transcribed into two alternative mRNAs potentially encoding proteins of different sizes. Mol Gen Genet 260 : 289–294.
57. KoelleMR, HorvitzHR (1996) EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins. Cell 84 : 115–125.
58. NotredameC, HigginsDG, HeringaJ (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302 : 205–217.
59. KiontkeK, FitchDH (2005) The phylogenetic relationships of Caenorhabditis and other rhabditids. WormBook 1–11.
Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte sa
Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
