Selective Pressures to Maintain Attachment Site Specificity of Integrative and Conjugative Elements
Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) are widespread mobile genetic elements that are usually found integrated in bacterial chromosomes. They are important agents of evolution and contribute to the acquisition of new traits, including antibiotic resistances. ICEs can excise from the chromosome and transfer to recipients by conjugation. Many ICEs are site-specific in that they integrate preferentially into a primary attachment site in the bacterial genome. Site-specific ICEs can also integrate into secondary locations, particularly if the primary site is absent. However, little is known about the consequences of integration of ICEs into alternative attachment sites or what drives the apparent maintenance and prevalence of the many ICEs that use a single attachment site. Using ICEBs1, a site-specific ICE from Bacillus subtilis that integrates into a tRNA gene, we found that integration into secondary sites was detrimental to both ICEBs1 and the host cell. Excision of ICEBs1 from secondary sites was impaired either partially or completely, limiting the spread of ICEBs1. Furthermore, induction of ICEBs1 gene expression caused a substantial drop in proliferation and cell viability within three hours. This drop was dependent on rolling circle replication of ICEBs1 that was unable to excise from the chromosome. Together, these detrimental effects provide selective pressure against the survival and dissemination of ICEs that have integrated into alternative sites and may explain the maintenance of site-specific integration for many ICEs.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Selective Pressures to Maintain Attachment Site Specificity of Integrative and Conjugative Elements. PLoS Genet 9(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003623
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003623
Souhrn
Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) are widespread mobile genetic elements that are usually found integrated in bacterial chromosomes. They are important agents of evolution and contribute to the acquisition of new traits, including antibiotic resistances. ICEs can excise from the chromosome and transfer to recipients by conjugation. Many ICEs are site-specific in that they integrate preferentially into a primary attachment site in the bacterial genome. Site-specific ICEs can also integrate into secondary locations, particularly if the primary site is absent. However, little is known about the consequences of integration of ICEs into alternative attachment sites or what drives the apparent maintenance and prevalence of the many ICEs that use a single attachment site. Using ICEBs1, a site-specific ICE from Bacillus subtilis that integrates into a tRNA gene, we found that integration into secondary sites was detrimental to both ICEBs1 and the host cell. Excision of ICEBs1 from secondary sites was impaired either partially or completely, limiting the spread of ICEBs1. Furthermore, induction of ICEBs1 gene expression caused a substantial drop in proliferation and cell viability within three hours. This drop was dependent on rolling circle replication of ICEBs1 that was unable to excise from the chromosome. Together, these detrimental effects provide selective pressure against the survival and dissemination of ICEs that have integrated into alternative sites and may explain the maintenance of site-specific integration for many ICEs.
Zdroje
1. WozniakRA, WaldorMK (2010) Integrative and conjugative elements: mosaic mobile genetic elements enabling dynamic lateral gene flow. Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 552–563.
2. GuglielminiJ, QuintaisL, Garcillan-BarciaMP, de la CruzF, RochaEP (2011) The repertoire of ICE in prokaryotes underscores the unity, diversity, and ubiquity of conjugation. PLoS Genet 7: e1002222.
3. LeeCA, ThomasJ, GrossmanAD (2012) The Bacillus subtilis conjugative transposon ICEBs1 mobilizes plasmids lacking dedicated mobilization functions. J Bacteriol 194: 3165–3172.
4. SalyersAA, ShoemakerNB, StevensAM, LiLY (1995) Conjugative transposons: an unusual and diverse set of integrated gene transfer elements. Microbiol Rev 59: 579–590.
5. HochhutB, WaldorMK (1999) Site-specific integration of the conjugal Vibrio cholerae SXT element into prfC. Mol Microbiol 32: 99–110.
6. RobertsAP, MullanyP (2009) A modular master on the move: the Tn916 family of mobile genetic elements. Trends Microbiol 17: 251–258.
7. MullanyP, WilliamsR, LangridgeGC, TurnerDJ, WhalanR, et al. (2012) Behavior and target site selection of conjugative transposon Tn916 in two different strains of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 2147–2153.
8. BurrusV, WaldorMK (2004) Shaping bacterial genomes with integrative and conjugative elements. Res Microbiol 155: 376–386.
9. WilliamsKP (2002) Integration sites for genetic elements in prokaryotic tRNA and tmRNA genes: sublocation preference of integrase subfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 866–875.
10. LeeCA, AuchtungJM, MonsonRE, GrossmanAD (2007) Identification and characterization of int (integrase), xis (excisionase) and chromosomal attachment sites of the integrative and conjugative element ICEBs1 of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 66: 1356–1369.
11. AuchtungJM, LeeCA, MonsonRE, LehmanAP, GrossmanAD (2005) Regulation of a Bacillus subtilis mobile genetic element by intercellular signaling and the global DNA damage response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 12554–12559.
12. BurrusV, PavlovicG, DecarisB, GuedonG (2002) The ICESt1 element of Streptococcus thermophilus belongs to a large family of integrative and conjugative elements that exchange modules and change their specificity of integration. Plasmid 48: 77–97.
13. FrankeAE, ClewellDB (1981) Evidence for conjugal transfer of a Streptococcus faecalis transposon (Tn916) from a chromosomal site in the absence of plasmid DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 45 Pt 1: 77–80.
14. FrankeAE, ClewellDB (1981) Evidence for a chromosome-borne resistance transposon (Tn916) in Streptococcus faecalis that is capable of “conjugal” transfer in the absence of a conjugative plasmid. J Bacteriol 145: 494–502.
15. LeeCA, BabicA, GrossmanAD (2010) Autonomous plasmid-like replication of a conjugative transposon. Mol Microbiol 75: 268–279.
16. SitkiewiczI, GreenNM, GuoN, MereghettiL, MusserJM (2011) Lateral gene transfer of streptococcal ICE element RD2 (region of difference 2) encoding secreted proteins. BMC Microbiol 11: 65.
17. CarraroN, LibanteV, MorelC, DecarisB, Charron-BourgoinF, et al. (2011) Differential regulation of two closely related integrative and conjugative elements from Streptococcus thermophilus. BMC Microbiol 11: 238.
18. RamsayJP, SullivanJT, StuartGS, LamontIL, RonsonCW (2006) Excision and transfer of the Mesorhizobium loti R7A symbiosis island requires an integrase IntS, a novel recombination directionality factor RdfS, and a putative relaxase RlxS. Mol Microbiol 62: 723–734.
19. ThomasJ, LeeCA, GrossmanAD (2013) A conserved helicase processivity factor is needed for conjugation and replication of an integrative and conjugative element. PLoS Genet 9: e103198.
20. YoshidaK, YamaguchiM, MorinagaT, KineharaM, IkeuchiM, et al. (2008) myo-Inositol catabolism in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 283: 10415–10424.
21. CrooksGE, HonG, ChandoniaJM, BrennerSE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14: 1188–1190.
22. AuchtungJM, LeeCA, GarrisonKL, GrossmanAD (2007) Identification and characterization of the immunity repressor (ImmR) that controls the mobile genetic element ICEBs1 of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 64: 1515–1528.
23. LeeCA, GrossmanAD (2007) Identification of the origin of transfer (oriT) and DNA relaxase required for conjugation of the integrative and conjugative element ICEBs1 of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 189: 7254–7261.
24. BerkmenMB, LeeCA, LovedayEK, GrossmanAD (2010) Polar positioning of a conjugation protein from the integrative and conjugative element ICEBs1 of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 192: 38–45.
25. GoranovAI, KatzL, BreierAM, BurgeCB, GrossmanAD (2005) A transcriptional response to replication status mediated by the conserved bacterial replication protein DnaA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 12932–12937.
26. IretonK, GrossmanAD (1994) A developmental checkpoint couples the initiation of sporulation to DNA replication in Bacillus subtilis. Embo J 13: 1566–1573.
27. CheoDL, BaylesKW, YasbinRE (1991) Cloning and characterization of DNA damage-inducible promoter regions from Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 173: 1696–1703.
28. BurrusV, WaldorMK (2003) Control of SXT integration and excision. J Bacteriol 185: 5045–5054.
29. ShimadaK, WeisbergRA, GottesmanME (1972) Prophage lambda at unusual chromosomal locations. I. Location of the secondary attachment sites and the properties of the lysogens. J Mol Biol 63: 483–503.
30. SmitsWK, GrossmanAD (2010) The transcriptional regulator Rok binds A+T-rich DNA and is involved in repression of a mobile genetic element in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet 6: e1001207.
31. CelliJ, Trieu-CuotP (1998) Circularization of Tn916 is required for expression of the transposon-encoded transfer functions: characterization of long tetracycline-inducible transcripts reading through the attachment site. Mol Microbiol 28: 103–117.
32. GarrityDB, ZahlerSA (1994) Mutations in the gene for a tRNA that functions as a regulator of a transcriptional attenuator in Bacillus subtilis. Genetics 137: 627–636.
33. HoSN, HuntHD, HortonRM, PullenJK, PeaseLR (1989) Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77: 51–59.
34. Youngman P, Poth H, Green B, York K, Olmedo G, et al.. (1989) Methods for Genetic Manipulation, Cloning, and Functional Analysis of Sporulation Genes in Bacillus subtilis. In: Smith I, Slepecky RA, Setlow P, editors. Regulation of Procaryotic Development. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press. pp. 65–87.
35. WachA (1996) PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 12: 259–265.
36. Miller JH (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. xvi, 466 p.
37. JaacksKJ, HealyJ, LosickR, GrossmanAD (1989) Identification and characterization of genes controlled by the sporulation-regulatory gene spo0H in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 171: 4121–4129.
38. GlaserP, FrangeulL, BuchrieserC, RusniokC, AmendA, et al. (2001) Comparative genomics of Listeria species. Science 294: 849–852.
39. PeregoM, SpiegelmanGB, HochJA (1988) Structure of the gene for the transition state regulator, abrB: regulator synthesis is controlled by the spo0A sporulation gene in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 2: 689–699.
40. VandeyarMA, ZahlerSA (1986) Chromosomal insertions of Tn917 in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 167: 530–534.
41. SmithBT, GrossmanAD, WalkerGC (2001) Visualization of mismatch repair in bacterial cells. Mol Cell 8: 1197–1206.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 7
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Cohesion Protein SOLO Associates with SMC1 and Is Required for Synapsis, Recombination, Homolog Bias and Cohesion and Pairing of Centromeres in Drosophila Meiosis
- Independent Evolution of Transcriptional Inactivation on Sex Chromosomes in Birds and Mammals
- Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry
- Role of CTCF Protein in Regulating Locus Transcription