#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Dissection of Pol II Trigger Loop Function and Pol II Activity–Dependent Control of Start Site Selection


Structural and biochemical studies have revealed the importance of a conserved, mobile domain of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II), the Trigger Loop (TL), in substrate selection and catalysis. The relative contributions of different residues within the TL to Pol II function and how Pol II activity defects correlate with gene expression alteration in vivo are unknown. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II as a model, we uncover complex genetic relationships between mutated TL residues by combinatorial analysis of multiply substituted TL variants. We show that in vitro biochemical activity is highly predictive of in vivo transcription phenotypes, suggesting direct relationships between phenotypes and Pol II activity. Interestingly, while multiple TL residues function together to promote proper transcription, individual residues can be separated into distinct functional classes likely relevant to the TL mechanism. In vivo, Pol II activity defects disrupt regulation of the GTP-sensitive IMD2 gene, explaining sensitivities to GTP-production inhibitors, but contrasting with commonly cited models for this sensitivity in the literature. Our data provide support for an existing model whereby Pol II transcriptional activity provides a proxy for direct sensing of NTP levels in vivo leading to IMD2 activation. Finally, we connect Pol II activity to transcription start site selection in vivo, implicating the Pol II active site and transcription itself as a driver for start site scanning, contravening current models for this process.


Vyšlo v časopise: Dissection of Pol II Trigger Loop Function and Pol II Activity–Dependent Control of Start Site Selection. PLoS Genet 8(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002627
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002627

Souhrn

Structural and biochemical studies have revealed the importance of a conserved, mobile domain of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II), the Trigger Loop (TL), in substrate selection and catalysis. The relative contributions of different residues within the TL to Pol II function and how Pol II activity defects correlate with gene expression alteration in vivo are unknown. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II as a model, we uncover complex genetic relationships between mutated TL residues by combinatorial analysis of multiply substituted TL variants. We show that in vitro biochemical activity is highly predictive of in vivo transcription phenotypes, suggesting direct relationships between phenotypes and Pol II activity. Interestingly, while multiple TL residues function together to promote proper transcription, individual residues can be separated into distinct functional classes likely relevant to the TL mechanism. In vivo, Pol II activity defects disrupt regulation of the GTP-sensitive IMD2 gene, explaining sensitivities to GTP-production inhibitors, but contrasting with commonly cited models for this sensitivity in the literature. Our data provide support for an existing model whereby Pol II transcriptional activity provides a proxy for direct sensing of NTP levels in vivo leading to IMD2 activation. Finally, we connect Pol II activity to transcription start site selection in vivo, implicating the Pol II active site and transcription itself as a driver for start site scanning, contravening current models for this process.


Zdroje

1. WangDBushnellDAWestoverKDKaplanCDKornbergRD 2006 Structural basis of transcription: role of the trigger loop in substrate specificity and catalysis. Cell 127 941 954

2. KaplanCDLarssonKMKornbergRD 2008 The RNA polymerase II trigger loop functions in substrate selection and is directly targeted by alpha-amanitin. Molecular cell 30 547 556

3. VassylyevDGVassylyevaMNZhangJPalangatMArtsimovitchI 2007 Structural basis for substrate loading in bacterial RNA polymerase. Nature 448 163 168

4. TemiakovDZenkinNVassylyevaMNPerederinaATahirovTH 2005 Structural basis of transcription inhibition by antibiotic streptolydigin. Mol Cell 19 655 666

5. YuzenkovaYBochkarevaATadigotlaVRRoghanianMZorovS 2010 Stepwise mechanism for transcription fidelity. BMC Biol 8 54

6. KaplanCD 2010 The architecture of RNA polymerase fidelity. BMC Biol 8 85

7. ZhangJPalangatMLandickR 2010 Role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in catalysis and pausing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17 99 104

8. ToulokhonovIZhangJPalangatMLandickR 2007 A central role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in active-site rearrangement during transcriptional pausing. Mol Cell 27 406 419

9. KireevaMLNedialkovYACremonaGHPurtovYALubkowskaL 2008 Transient reversal of RNA polymerase II active site closing controls fidelity of transcription elongation. Mol Cell 30 557 566

10. SydowJFBruecknerFCheungACDamsmaGEDenglS 2009 Structural basis of transcription: mismatch-specific fidelity mechanisms and paused RNA polymerase II with frayed RNA. Mol Cell 34 710 721

11. BruecknerFCramerP 2008 Structural basis of transcription inhibition by alpha-amanitin and implications for RNA polymerase II translocation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15 811 818

12. SpahrHCaleroGBushnellDAKornbergRD 2009 Schizosacharomyces pombe RNA polymerase II at 3.6-A resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 9185 9190

13. CheungACSainsburySCramerP 2011 Structural basis of initial RNA polymerase II transcription. The EMBO journal 30 4755 4763

14. TagamiSSekineSKumarevelTHinoNMurayamaY 2010 Crystal structure of bacterial RNA polymerase bound with a transcription inhibitor protein. Nature 468 978 982

15. KettenbergerHArmacheKJCramerP 2003 Architecture of the RNA polymerase II-TFIIS complex and implications for mRNA cleavage. Cell 114 347 357

16. Bar-NahumGEpshteinVRuckensteinAERafikovRMustaevA 2005 A ratchet mechanism of transcription elongation and its control. Cell 120 183 193

17. YuzenkovaYZenkinN 2010 Central role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in intrinsic RNA hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 10878 10883

18. MalagonFKireevaMLShaferBKLubkowskaLKashlevM 2006 Mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPB1 gene conferring hypersensitivity to 6-azauracil. Genetics 172 2201 2209

19. TanLWieslerSTrzaskaDCarneyHCWeinzierlRO 2008 Bridge helix and trigger loop perturbations generate superactive RNA polymerases. J Biol 7 40

20. CastroCSmidanskyEDArnoldJJMaksimchukKRMoustafaI 2009 Nucleic acid polymerases use a general acid for nucleotidyl transfer. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16 212 218

21. HekmatpanahDSYoungRA 1991 Mutations in a conserved region of RNA polymerase II influence the accuracy of mRNA start site selection. Mol Cell Biol 11 5781 5791

22. ArchambaultJJansmaDBKawasoeJHArndtKTGreenblattJ 1998 Stimulation of transcription by mutations affecting conserved regions of RNA polymerase II. J Bacteriol 180 2590 2598

23. WeilbaecherRHebronCFengGLandickR 1994 Termination-altering amino acid substitutions in the beta' subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase identify regions involved in RNA chain elongation. Genes Dev 8 2913 2927

24. SweeneyMJ 1977 Mycophenolic acid and its mechanism of action in cancer and psoriasis. Jpn J Antibiot 30 Suppl 85 92

25. ExingerFLacrouteF 1992 6-Azauracil inhibition of GTP biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 22 9 11

26. HandschumacherREPasternakCA 1958 Inhibition of orotidylic acid decarboxylase, a primary site of carcinostasis by 6-azauracil. Biochimica et biophysica acta 30 451 452

27. MasonPBStruhlK 2005 Distinction and relationship between elongation rate and processivity of RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol Cell 17 831 840

28. KulishDStruhlK 2001 TFIIS enhances transcriptional elongation through an artificial arrest site in vivo. Molecular and cellular biology 21 4162 4168

29. HoweKJKaneCMAresMJr 2003 Perturbation of transcription elongation influences the fidelity of internal exon inclusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rna 9 993 1006

30. GrigullJMnaimnehSPootoolalJRobinsonMDHughesTR 2004 Genome-wide analysis of mRNA stability using transcription inhibitors and microarrays reveals posttranscriptional control of ribosome biogenesis factors. Molecular and cellular biology 24 5534 5547

31. ArchambaultJLacrouteFRuetAFriesenJD 1992 Genetic interaction between transcription elongation factor TFIIS and RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 12 4142 4152

32. PowellWReinesD 1996 Mutations in the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II cause 6-azauracil sensitivity in yeast and increased transcriptional arrest in vitro. J Biol Chem 271 6866 6873

33. WuJAwreyDEEdwardsAMArchambaultJFriesenJD 1996 In vitro characterization of mutant yeast RNA polymerase II with reduced binding for elongation factor TFIIS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93 11552 11557

34. HemmingSAJansmaDBMacgregorPFGoryachevAFriesenJD 2000 RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb9 regulates transcription elongation in vivo. J Biol Chem 275 35506 35511

35. ShawRJReinesD 2000 Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription elongation mutants are defective in PUR5 induction in response to nucleotide depletion. Mol Cell Biol 20 7427 7437

36. KeoghMCPodolnyVBuratowskiS 2003 Bur1 kinase is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 23 7005 7018

37. KimHJJeongSHHeoJHJeongSJKimST 2004 mRNA capping enzyme activity is coupled to an early transcription elongation. Mol Cell Biol 24 6184 6193

38. RilesLShawRJJohnstonMReinesD 2004 Large-scale screening of yeast mutants for sensitivity to the IMP dehydrogenase inhibitor 6-azauracil. Yeast 21 241 248

39. XiaoTKaoCFKroganNJSunZWGreenblattJF 2005 Histone H2B ubiquitylation is associated with elongating RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 25 637 651

40. DuHNFingermanIMBriggsSD 2008 Histone H3 K36 methylation is mediated by a trans-histone methylation pathway involving an interaction between Set2 and histone H4. Genes Dev 22 2786 2798

41. SongYHAhnSH 2010 A Bre1-associated protein, large 1 (Lge1), promotes H2B ubiquitylation during the early stages of transcription elongation. J Biol Chem 285 2361 2367

42. HartzogGAWadaTHandaHWinstonF 1998 Evidence that Spt4, Spt5, and Spt6 control transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 12 357 369

43. OrphanidesGWuWHLaneWSHampseyMReinbergD 1999 The chromatin-specific transcription elongation factor FACT comprises human SPT16 and SSRP1 proteins. Nature 400 284 288

44. OteroGFellowsJLiYde BizemontTDiracAM 1999 Elongator, a multisubunit component of a novel RNA polymerase II holoenzyme for transcriptional elongation. Molecular cell 3 109 118

45. WittschiebenBOOteroGde BizemontTFellowsJErdjument-BromageH 1999 A novel histone acetyltransferase is an integral subunit of elongating RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Molecular cell 4 123 128

46. ShawRJWilsonJLSmithKTReinesD 2001 Regulation of an IMP dehydrogenase gene and its overexpression in drug-sensitive transcription elongation mutants of yeast. J Biol Chem 276 32905 32916

47. DesmoucellesCPinsonBSaint-MarcCDaignan-FornierB 2002 Screening the yeast “disruptome” for mutants affecting resistance to the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid. The Journal of biological chemistry 277 27036 27044

48. ReinesD 2003 Use of RNA yeast polymerase II mutants in studying transcription elongation. Methods Enzymol 371 284 292

49. GinsburgDSGovindCKHinnebuschAG 2009 NuA4 lysine acetyltransferase Esa1 is targeted to coding regions and stimulates transcription elongation with Gcn5. Mol Cell Biol 29 6473 6487

50. SchwabishMAStruhlK 2007 The Swi/Snf complex is important for histone eviction during transcriptional activation and RNA polymerase II elongation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 27 6987 6995

51. SunMLariviereLDenglSMayerACramerP 2010 A tandem SH2 domain in transcription elongation factor Spt6 binds the phosphorylated RNA polymerase II C-terminal repeat domain (CTD). The Journal of biological chemistry 285 41597 41603

52. SchneiderSPeiYShumanSSchwerB 2010 Separable functions of the fission yeast Spt5 carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) in capping enzyme binding and transcription elongation overlap with those of the RNA polymerase II CTD. Molecular and cellular biology 30 2353 2364

53. LindstromDLHartzogGA 2001 Genetic interactions of Spt4–Spt5 and TFIIS with the RNA polymerase II CTD and CTD modifying enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159 487 497

54. Pascual-GarciaPGovindCKQueraltECuenca-BonoBLlopisA 2008 Sus1 is recruited to coding regions and functions during transcription elongation in association with SAGA and TREX2. Genes Dev 22 2811 2822

55. JenksMHReinesD 2005 Dissection of the molecular basis of mycophenolate resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 22 1181 1190

56. HyleJWShawRJReinesD 2003 Functional distinctions between IMP dehydrogenase genes in providing mycophenolate resistance and guanine prototrophy to yeast. J Biol Chem 278 28470 28478

57. KuehnerJNBrowDA 2008 Regulation of a eukaryotic gene by GTP-dependent start site selection and transcription attenuation. Mol Cell 31 201 211

58. JenksMHO'RourkeTWReinesD 2008 Properties of an intergenic terminator and start site switch that regulate IMD2 transcription in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 28 3883 3893

59. SimchenGWinstonFStylesCAFinkGR 1984 Ty-mediated gene expression of the LYS2 and HIS4 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the same SPT genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81 2431 2434

60. KaplanCDHollandMJWinstonF 2005 Interaction between transcription elongation factors and mRNA 3′-end formation at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL10-GAL7 locus. J Biol Chem 280 913 922

61. GregerIHProudfootNJ 1998 Poly(A) signals control both transcriptional termination and initiation between the tandem GAL10 and GAL7 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J 17 4771 4779

62. BucheliMEHeXKaplanCDMooreCLBuratowskiS 2007 Polyadenylation site choice in yeast is affected by competition between Npl3 and polyadenylation factor CFI. Rna 13 1756 1764

63. BucheliMEBuratowskiS 2005 Npl3 is an antagonist of mRNA 3′ end formation by RNA polymerase II. Embo J 24 2150 2160

64. MaloneEAClarkCDChiangAWinstonF 1991 Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11 5710 5717

65. WinstonFChaleffDTValentBFinkGR 1984 Mutations affecting Ty-mediated expression of the HIS4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 107 179 197

66. PrelichGWinstonF 1993 Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics 135 665 676

67. WestoverKDBushnellDAKornbergRD 2004 Structural basis of transcription: nucleotide selection by rotation in the RNA polymerase II active center. Cell 119 481 489

68. GnattALCramerPFuJBushnellDAKornbergRD 2001 Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3 A resolution. Science 292 1876 1882

69. KettenbergerHArmacheKJCramerP 2004 Complete RNA polymerase II elongation complex structure and its interactions with NTP and TFIIS. Mol Cell 16 955 965

70. KwapiszMWeryMDespresDGhavi-HelmYSoutourinaJ 2008 Mutations of RNA polymerase II activate key genes of the nucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic pathways. The EMBO journal 27 2411 2421

71. ThiebautMColinJNeilHJacquierASeraphinB 2008 Futile cycle of transcription initiation and termination modulates the response to nucleotide shortage in S. cerevisiae. Molecular cell 31 671 682

72. CramerPBushnellDAKornbergRD 2001 Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Science 292 1863 1876

73. BerroteranRWWareDEHampseyM 1994 The sua8 suppressors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode replacements of conserved residues within the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and affect transcription start site selection similarly to sua7 (TFIIB) mutations. Mol Cell Biol 14 226 237

74. SteinmetzEJWarrenCLKuehnerJNPanbehiBAnsariAZ 2006 Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. Mol Cell 24 735 746

75. PappasDLJrHampseyM 2000 Functional interaction between Ssu72 and the Rpb2 subunit of RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 20 8343 8351

76. PintoIWareDEHampseyM 1992 The yeast SUA7 gene encodes a homolog of human transcription factor TFIIB and is required for normal start site selection in vivo. Cell 68 977 988

77. SunZWTessmerAHampseyM 1996 Functional interaction between TFIIB and the Rpb9 (Ssu73) subunit of RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic acids research 24 2560 2566

78. SunZWHampseyM 1995 Identification of the gene (SSU71/TFG1) encoding the largest subunit of transcription factor TFIIF as a suppressor of a TFIIB mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92 3127 3131

79. HullMWMcKuneKWoychikNA 1995 RNA polymerase II subunit RPB9 is required for accurate start site selection. Genes Dev 9 481 490

80. GhazyMABrodieSAAmmermanMLZieglerLMPonticelliAS 2004 Amino acid substitutions in yeast TFIIF confer upstream shifts in transcription initiation and altered interaction with RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 24 10975 10985

81. EichnerJChenHTWarfieldLHahnS 2010 Position of the general transcription factor TFIIF within the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex. EMBO J 29 706 716

82. Freire-PicosMAKrishnamurthySSunZWHampseyM 2005 Evidence that the Tfg1/Tfg2 dimer interface of TFIIF lies near the active center of the RNA polymerase II initiation complex. Nucleic acids research 33 5045 5052

83. MajovskiRCKhaperskyyDAGhazyMAPonticelliAS 2005 A functional role for the switch 2 region of yeast RNA polymerase II in transcription start site utilization and abortive initiation. J Biol Chem 280 34917 34923

84. Furter-GravesEMHallBDFurterR 1994 Role of a small RNA pol II subunit in TATA to transcription start site spacing. Nucleic Acids Res 22 4932 4936

85. WalmacqCKireevaMLIrvinJNedialkovYLubkowskaL 2009 Rpb9 subunit controls transcription fidelity by delaying NTP sequestration in RNA polymerase II. The Journal of biological chemistry 284 19601 19612

86. NesserNKPetersonDOHawleyDK 2006 RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb9 is important for transcriptional fidelity in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 3268 3273

87. KoyamaHItoTNakanishiTSekimizuK 2007 Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcript cleavage activity contributes to maintain transcriptional fidelity in yeast. Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms 12 547 559

88. ZhangDYCarsonDJMaJ 2002 The role of TFIIB-RNA polymerase II interaction in start site selection in yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 30 3078 3085

89. GiardinaCLisJT 1993 DNA melting on yeast RNA polymerase II promoters. Science 261 759 762

90. HuangXWangDWeissDRBushnellDAKornbergRD 2010 RNA polymerase II trigger loop residues stabilize and position the incoming nucleotide triphosphate in transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 15745 15750

91. SvetlovVVassylyevDGArtsimovitchI 2004 Discrimination against deoxyribonucleotide substrates by bacterial RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 279 38087 38090

92. StruhlK 1989 Molecular mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in yeast. Annual review of biochemistry 58 1051 1077

93. LueNFFlanaganPMSugimotoKKornbergRD 1989 Initiation by yeast RNA polymerase II at the adenoviral major late promoter in vitro. Science 246 661 664

94. KhaperskyyDAAmmermanMLMajovskiRCPonticelliAS 2008 Functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIIF during transcription start site utilization. Mol Cell Biol 28 3757 3766

95. MillerGHahnS 2006 A DNA-tethered cleavage probe reveals the path for promoter DNA in the yeast preinitiation complex. Nature structural & molecular biology 13 603 610

96. CordenJL 2008 Yeast Pol II start-site selection: the long and the short of it. EMBO reports 9 1084 1086

97. KuehnerJNBrowDA 2006 Quantitative analysis of in vivo initiator selection by yeast RNA polymerase II supports a scanning model. The Journal of biological chemistry 281 14119 14128

98. KugelJFGoodrichJA 2002 Translocation after synthesis of a four-nucleotide RNA commits RNA polymerase II to promoter escape. Molecular and cellular biology 22 762 773

99. LiuXBushnellDASilvaDAHuangXKornbergRD 2011 Initiation complex structure and promoter proofreading. Science 333 633 637

100. FishburnJHahnS 2011 Architecture of the yeast RNA polymerase II open complex and regulation of activity by TFIIF. Molecular and cellular biology

101. WuWHPintoIChenBSHampseyM 1999 Mutational analysis of yeast TFIIB. A functional relationship between Ssu72 and Sub1/Tsp1 defined by allele-specific interactions with TFIIB. Genetics 153 643 652

102. PintoIWuWHNaJGHampseyM 1994 Characterization of sua7 mutations defines a domain of TFIIB involved in transcription start site selection in yeast. J Biol Chem 269 30569 30573

103. ChoEJBuratowskiS 1999 Evidence that transcription factor IIB is required for a post-assembly step in transcription initiation. J Biol Chem 274 25807 25813

104. BoekeJDTrueheartJNatsoulisGFinkGR 1987 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol 154 164 175

105. NonetMSweetserDYoungRA 1987 Functional redundancy and structural polymorphism in the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. Cell 50 909 915

106. AmbergDCBurkeDJStrathernJN 2005 Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual, 2005 Edition Cold Spring Harbor, NY Cold Spring Harbor Press 230

107. PuigOCasparyFRigautGRutzBBouveretE 2001 The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24 218 229

108. KomissarovaNKireevaMLBeckerJSidorenkovIKashlevM 2003 Engineering of elongation complexes of bacterial and yeast RNA polymerases. Methods Enzymol 371 233 251

109. SchmittMEBrownTATrumpowerBL 1990 A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic acids research 18 3091 3092

110. RanishJAHahnS 1991 The yeast general transcription factor TFIIA is composed of two polypeptide subunits. The Journal of biological chemistry 266 19320 19327

111. Schrodinger, LLC 2010 The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1

112. GregerIHArandaAProudfootN 2000 Balancing transcriptional interference and initiation on the GAL7 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97 8415 8420

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 4
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#