#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Mechanisms Employed by to Prevent Ribonucleotide Incorporation into Genomic DNA by Pol V


Escherichia coli pol V (UmuD′2C), the main translesion DNA polymerase, ensures continued nascent strand extension when the cellular replicase is blocked by unrepaired DNA lesions. Pol V is characterized by low sugar selectivity, which can be further reduced by a Y11A “steric-gate” substitution in UmuC that enables pol V to preferentially incorporate rNTPs over dNTPs in vitro. Despite efficient error-prone translesion synthesis catalyzed by UmuC_Y11A in vitro, strains expressing umuC_Y11A exhibit low UV mutability and UV resistance. Here, we show that these phenotypes result from the concomitant dual actions of Ribonuclease HII (RNase HII) initiating removal of rNMPs from the nascent DNA strand and nucleotide excision repair (NER) removing UV lesions from the parental strand. In the absence of either repair pathway, UV resistance and mutagenesis conferred by umuC_Y11A is significantly enhanced, suggesting that the combined actions of RNase HII and NER lead to double-strand breaks that result in reduced cell viability. We present evidence that the Y11A-specific UV phenotype is tempered by pol IV in vivo. At physiological ratios of the two polymerases, pol IV inhibits pol V–catalyzed translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV lesions and significantly reduces the number of Y11A-incorporated rNTPs by limiting the length of the pol V–dependent TLS tract generated during lesion bypass in vitro. In a recA730 lexA(Def) ΔumuDC ΔdinB strain, plasmid-encoded wild-type pol V promotes high levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. However, umuC_Y11A-dependent spontaneous mutagenesis is only ∼7% of that observed with wild-type pol V, but increases to ∼39% of wild-type levels in an isogenic ΔrnhB strain and ∼72% of wild-type levels in a ΔrnhA ΔrnhB double mutant. Our observations suggest that errant ribonucleotides incorporated by pol V can be tolerated in the E. coli genome, but at the cost of higher levels of cellular mutagenesis.


Vyšlo v časopise: Mechanisms Employed by to Prevent Ribonucleotide Incorporation into Genomic DNA by Pol V. PLoS Genet 8(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030

Souhrn

Escherichia coli pol V (UmuD′2C), the main translesion DNA polymerase, ensures continued nascent strand extension when the cellular replicase is blocked by unrepaired DNA lesions. Pol V is characterized by low sugar selectivity, which can be further reduced by a Y11A “steric-gate” substitution in UmuC that enables pol V to preferentially incorporate rNTPs over dNTPs in vitro. Despite efficient error-prone translesion synthesis catalyzed by UmuC_Y11A in vitro, strains expressing umuC_Y11A exhibit low UV mutability and UV resistance. Here, we show that these phenotypes result from the concomitant dual actions of Ribonuclease HII (RNase HII) initiating removal of rNMPs from the nascent DNA strand and nucleotide excision repair (NER) removing UV lesions from the parental strand. In the absence of either repair pathway, UV resistance and mutagenesis conferred by umuC_Y11A is significantly enhanced, suggesting that the combined actions of RNase HII and NER lead to double-strand breaks that result in reduced cell viability. We present evidence that the Y11A-specific UV phenotype is tempered by pol IV in vivo. At physiological ratios of the two polymerases, pol IV inhibits pol V–catalyzed translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV lesions and significantly reduces the number of Y11A-incorporated rNTPs by limiting the length of the pol V–dependent TLS tract generated during lesion bypass in vitro. In a recA730 lexA(Def) ΔumuDC ΔdinB strain, plasmid-encoded wild-type pol V promotes high levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. However, umuC_Y11A-dependent spontaneous mutagenesis is only ∼7% of that observed with wild-type pol V, but increases to ∼39% of wild-type levels in an isogenic ΔrnhB strain and ∼72% of wild-type levels in a ΔrnhA ΔrnhB double mutant. Our observations suggest that errant ribonucleotides incorporated by pol V can be tolerated in the E. coli genome, but at the cost of higher levels of cellular mutagenesis.


Zdroje

1. Vaisman A, McDonald JP, Woodgate R (2012) Translesion DNA Synthesis. In: Böck A, Curtiss R, Kaper JB, Karp PD, Neidhardt FC et al.., editors. EcoSal: Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular miology. Washington, DC: American Society for Biology.

2. CaiH, YuH, McEnteeK, KunkelTA, GoodmanMF (1995) Purification and properties of wild-type and exonuclease-deficient DNA polymerase II from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 270: 15327–15335.

3. BecherelOJ, FuchsRP (2001) Mechanism of DNA polymerase II-mediated frameshift mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8566–8571.

4. OhmoriH, HatadaE, QiaoY, TsujiM, FukudaR (1995) dinP, a new gene in Escherichia coli, whose product shows similarities to UmuC and its homologues. Mut Res 347: 1–7.

5. WagnerJ, GruzP, KimSR, YamadaM, MatsuiK, et al. (1999) The dinB gene encodes an novel Escherichia coli DNA polymerase (DNA pol IV) involved in mutagenesis. Mol Cell 4: 281–286.

6. KatoT, ShinouraY (1977) Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light. Mol Gen Genet 156: 121–131.

7. JaroszDF, BeuningPJ, CohenSE, WalkerGC (2007) Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol 15: 70–77.

8. SchlacherK, GoodmanMF (2007) Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 587–594.

9. JaroszDF, GodoyVG, DelaneyJC, EssigmannJM, WalkerGC (2006) A single amino acid governs enhanced activity of DinB DNA polymerases on damaged templates. Nature 439: 225–228.

10. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood R, Schultz RA, et al.. (2006) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington, DC: ASM Press.

11. SteinbornG (1978) Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet 165: 87–93.

12. WoodgateR, RajagopalanM, LuC, EcholsH (1989) UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD′. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 7301–7305.

13. NohmiT, BattistaJR, DodsonLA, WalkerGC (1988) RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 1816–1820.

14. DutreixM, MoreauPL, BailoneA, GalibertF, BattistaJR, et al. (1989) New recA mutations that dissociate the various RecA protein activities in Escherichia coli provide evidence for an additional role for RecA protein in UV mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 171: 2415–2423.

15. SweasyJB, WitkinEM, SinhaN, Roegner-ManiscalcoV (1990) RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity. J Bacteriol 172: 3030–3036.

16. SchlacherK, CoxMM, WoodgateR, GoodmanMF (2006) RecA acts in trans to allow replication of damaged DNA by DNA polymerase V. Nature 442: 883–887.

17. JiangQ, KarataK, WoodgateR, CoxMM, GoodmanMF (2009) The active form of DNA polymerase V is UmuD′2C-RecA-ATP. Nature 460: 359–363.

18. TangM, PhamP, ShenX, TaylorJ-S, O′DonnellM, et al. (2000) Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis. Nature 404: 1014–1018.

19. PhamP, RangarajanS, WoodgateR, GoodmanMF (2001) Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8350–8354.

20. VaismanA, KubanW, McDonaldJP, KarataK, YangW, et al. (2012) Critical amino acids in Escherichis coli responsible for sugar discrimination and base-substitution fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 6144–6157.

21. KubanW, VaismanA, McDonaldJP, KarataK, YangW, et al. (2012) Escherichia coli UmuC active site mutants: effects on translesion DNA synthesis, mutagenesis and cell survival. DNA Repair 11: 726–732.

22. BrownJA, SuoZ (2011) Unlocking the sugar “steric gate” of DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 50: 1135–1142.

23. Nick McElhinnySA, WattsBE, KumarD, WattDL, LundstromEB, et al. (2010) Abundant ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA by yeast replicative polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 4949–4954.

24. ShenY, KohKD, WeissB, StoriciF (2012) Mispaired rNMPs in DNA are mutagenic and are targets of mismatch repair and RNases H. Nat Struc Mol Biol 19: 98–104.

25. Nick McElhinnySA, KumarD, ClarkAB, WattDL, WattsBE, et al. (2010) Genome instability due to ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA. Nat Chem Biol 6: 774–781.

26. LazzaroF, NovarinaD, AmaraF, WattDL, StoneJE, et al. (2012) RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA. Mol Cell 45: 99–110.

27. KimN, HuangSN, WilliamsJS, LiYC, ClarkAB, et al. (2011) Mutagenic processing of ribonucleotides in DNA by yeast topoisomerase I. Science 332: 1561–1564.

28. KanayaS (2009) Ribonuclease H. The FEBS journal 276: 1481.

29. Hollis T, Shaban NM (2011) Structure and functions of RNase H enzymes. In: Nicholson AW, editor. Ribonucleases: Springer. pp. 299–318.

30. TurchiJJ, HuangL, MuranteRS, KimY, BambaraRA (1994) Enzymatic completion of mammalian lagging-strand DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 9803–9807.

31. GoulianM, RichardsSH, HeardCJ, BigsbyBM (1990) Discontinuous DNA synthesis by purified mammalian proteins. J Biol Chem 265: 18461–18471.

32. RydbergB, GameJ (2002) Excision of misincorporated ribonucleotides in DNA by RNase H (type 2) and FEN-1 in cell-free extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16654–16659.

33. BubeckD, ReijnsMA, GrahamSC, AstellKR, JonesEY, et al. (2011) PCNA directs type 2 RNase H activity on DNA replication and repair substrates. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 3652–3666.

34. Nick McElhinnySA, KisslingGE, KunkelTA (2010) Differential correction of lagging-strand replication errors made by DNA polymerases α and δ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21070–21075.

35. ClarkAB, LujanSA, KisslingGE, KunkelTA (2011) Mismatch repair-independent tandem repeat sequence instability resulting from ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerase ε. DNA Repair 10: 476–482.

36. ItayaM, OmoriA, KanayaS, CrouchRJ, TanakaT, et al. (1999) Isolation of RNase H genes that are essential for growth of Bacillus subtilis 168. J Bacteriol 181: 2118–2123.

37. CarlPL, BloomL, CrouchRJ (1980) Isolation and mapping of a mutation in Escherichia coli with altered levels of ribonuclease H. J Bacteriol 144: 28–35.

38. ItayaM (1990) Isolation and characterization of a second RNase H (RNase HII) of Escherichia coli K-12 encoded by the rnhB gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 8587–8591.

39. AsaiT, KogomaT (1994) D-loops and R-loops: alternative mechanisms for the initiation of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 176: 1807–1812.

40. Fernández de HenestrosaAR, OgiT, AoyagiS, ChafinD, HayesJJ, et al. (2000) Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA-regulon in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 35: 1560–1572.

41. MountDW (1977) A mutant of Escherichia coli showing constitutive expression of the lysogenic induction and error-prone DNA repair pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74: 300–304.

42. KimSR, MatsuiK, YamadaM, GruzP, NohmiT (2001) Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genomics 266: 207–215.

43. KubanW, Banach-OrlowskaM, SchaaperRM, JonczykP, FijalkowskaIJ (2006) Role of DNA polymerase IV in Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity. J Bacteriol 188: 7977–7980.

44. WelchMM, McHenryCS (1982) Cloning and identification of the product of the dnaE gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 152: 351–356.

45. KarataK, VidalAE, WoodgateR (2009) Construction of a circular single-stranded DNA template containing a defined lesion. DNA Repair 8: 852–856.

46. KarataK, VaismanA, GoodmanMF, WoodgateR (2012) Simple and efficient purification of E.coli DNA polymerase V: cofactor requirements for optimal activity and processivity in vitro. DNA Repair 11: 431–440.

47. WoodgateR, EnnisDG (1991) Levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins and requirements for in vivo UmuD cleavage. Mol Gen Genet 229: 10–16.

48. FijalkowskaIJ, DunnRL, SchaaperRM (1997) Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity. J Bacteriol 179: 7435–7445.

49. VlašićI, ŠimatovićA, Brčić-KostićK (2011) Genetic requirements for high constitutive SOS expression in recA730 mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 193: 4643–4651.

50. QiuJ, QianY, FrankP, WintersbergerU, ShenB (1999) Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase H(35) functions in RNA primer removal during lagging-strand DNA synthesis, most efficiently in cooperation with Rad27 nuclease. Mol Cell Biol 19: 8361–8371.

51. ChenJZ, QiuJ, ShenB, HolmquistGP (2000) Mutational spectrum analysis of RNase H(35) deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae using fluorescence-based directed termination PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 3649–3656.

52. MeadS, VaismanA, Valjavec-GratianM, KarataK, VandewieleD, et al. (2007) Characterization of polVR391: a Y-family polymerase encoded by rumA′B from the IncJ conjugative transposon, R391. Mol Microbiol 63: 797–810.

53. Miller JH (1992) A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

54. CurtiE, McDonaldJP, MeadS, WoodgateR (2009) DNA polymerase switching: effects on spontaneous mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 71: 315–331.

55. ItayaM, CrouchRJ (1991) A combination of RNase H (rnh) and recBCD or sbcB mutations in Escherichia coli K12 adversely affects growth. Mol Gen Genet 227: 424–432.

56. BabaT, AraT, HasegawaM, TakaiY, OkumuraY, et al. (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2: 2006.0008.

57. ChurchwardG, BelinD, NagamineY (1984) A pSC101-derived plasmid which shows no sequence homology to other commonly used cloning vectors. Gene 31: 165–171.

58. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

59. DavisBD, MingioliES (1950) Mutants of Escherichia coli requiring methionine or vitamin B12. J Bacteriol 60: 17–28.

60. SedgwickSG, BridgesBA (1972) Survival, mutation and capacity to repair single strand DNA breaks after gamma irradiation in different exr− strains of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 119: 93–102.

61. RangarajanS, WoodgateR, GoodmanMF (1999) A phenotype for enigmatic DNA polymerase II: a pivotal role for pol II in replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 9224–9229.

62. BordenA, O'GradyPI, VandewieleD, Fernández de HenestrosaAR, LawrenceCW, et al. (2002) Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III can replicate efficiently past a T-T cis-syn dimer if DNA polymerase V and the 3′ to 5′ exonuclease proofreading function encoded by dnaQ are inactivated. J Bacteriol 184: 2674–2681.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 11
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#