Impact of sialoendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of submandibular gland sialolithiasis

Czech version

Authors: Dominik Tichý ¹ ; Patrícia Gubová ¹; Lucia Staníková ^1,2 ; Peter Kántor ^1,2 ; Pavel Komínek ^1,2
Authors‘ workplace: Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku, FN Ostrava ¹; Katedra kraniofaciálních oborů, Lékařská fakulta OU, Ostrava ²
Published in: Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 74, 2025, No. 3, pp. 195-201.
Category: Original Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl2025195

Overview

Introduction: Sialolithiasis is one of the most common causes of benign obstructive salivary gland disease, most frequently affecting the submandibular gland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of sialoendoscopy in patients with submandibular gland sialolithiasis. Materials and methods: This retrospective study (2010–2023) focused on patients with submandibular gland sialolithiasis who underwent sialendoscopy. When sialolithiasis was identified, the characteristics of the sialoliths (location, mobility, and size) were assessed. Success rate of stone extraction and postoperative outcomes were also evaluated. Results: A total of 338 patients presenting with submandibular gland swelling and pain were analyzed. Sialolithiasis was confirmed in 215/338 (63.6%) patients. A freely mobile sialolith was found in 78/215 (36.3%) cases and a fixed one in 137/215 (63.7%) cases, of which 50/215 (23.2%) were located distally and 87/215 (40.5%) were found proximally. The stone was successfully removed sialoendoscopically in 74/78 (94.9%) of freely mobile sialoliths, in 47/50 (94.0%) that were distally fixed, and in 50/87 (57.5%) that were proximally fixed sialoliths. Success rate of sialendoscopic extraction differed significantly according to the mobility and location of the sialolith –⁠ higher success was achieved with mobile and distally fixed stones, while a lower success rate was seen with proximally fixed ones (P < 0.001). Significantly higher extraction success rate was observed in sialoliths with a size up to 4 mm in diameter (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Sialoendoscopically-assisted extraction of freely mobile and distally located sialoliths with a maximum diameter of 4 mm demonstrates high success rates, alleviates patient symptoms, and preserves salivary gland function.

Keywords:

sialolithiasis – benign obstructive disease of the salivary glands – sialoendoscopy – submandibular gland

Sources

1. Wilson KF, Meier JD, Ward PD. Salivary gland disorders. Am Fam Physician 2014; 89 (11): 882–888. ISSN: 1532-0650.

2. Chen T, Szwimer R, Daniel SJ. The changing landscape of pediatric salivary gland stones: A half-century systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 159 : 111216. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111216.

3. Štrympl P, Staníková L, Matoušek P et al. Sialoendoskopie v diagnostice a léčbě litiázy podčelistní slinné žlázy. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 2015; 64 (3): 157–162.

4. Hald J, Andreassen UK. Submandibular gland excision: short -⁠ and long-term complications. ORL 1994; 56 (2): 87–91. Doi: 10.1159/000276616.

5. Nahlieli O, Nakar LH, Nazarian Y et al. Sialoendoscopy: a new approach to salivary gland obstructive pathology. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137 (10): 1394–1400. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0051.

6. Štrympl P, Komínek L, Pniak P. Sialoendoskopie –⁠ nová metoda v diagnostice a léčbě benigní obstrukční choroby slinných žláz. Endoskopie 2011; 20 (1): 29–33.

7. Kraaij S, Karagozoglu KH, Forouzanfar T et al. Salivary stones: symptoms, aetiology, biochemical composition and treatment. Br Dent J 2014; 217 (11): E23. Doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj. 2014.1041.

8. Anniko M. Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Berlin: Springer 2010.

9. Escudier M, McGurk M. Symptomatic sialoadenitis and sialolithiasis in the English population: an estimate of the cost of hospital treatment. Br Dent J 1999; 186 : 463–466. Doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800161.

10. Lari N, Chossegros C, Thiery Get al. Sialendoscopie des glandes salivaires. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2008; 109 (3): 167–171. Doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2008.04.003.

11. Bannikova KA, Bosykh YY, Gaitova VG et al. Indications for the use of sialoendoscopy in sialolithiasis. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 12 (3): 41–45. Doi: 10.17691/stm2020. 12.3.05.

12. Rotnágl J, Plánička M, Navara M. Úloha sialoendoskopie v miniinvazivní léčbě sialolitiázy. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 2014; 63 (4): 220–226.

13. Zenk J, Koch M, Klintworth N et al. Sialendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis: a study on more than 1000 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (5): 858–863. Doi: 10.1177/0194599812452837.

14. Koch M, Zenk J, Iro H. Algorithms for treatment of salivary gland obstructions. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42 (6): 1173–1192. Doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2009.08.002.

15. Witt R L, Iro H, Koch M et al. Minimally invasive options for salivary calculi. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (6): 1306–1311. Doi: 10.1002/lary.23272.

16. Nahlieli O. Classic approaches to sialoendoscopy for treatment of sialolithiasis. In: Witt RL. Salivary Gland Diseases. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers 2006 : 79–93.