#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the deep branch of the radial nerve – a retrospective analysis of surgically treated cases


Authors: M. Beneš 1-3;  I. Humhej 2-4;  H. Zítek 2-4;  D. Kachlík 2,3;  V. Kunc 2,3,5
Authors‘ workplace: 1 st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic 1;  Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 2;  Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 3;  Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Health Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic 4;  Clinic of Trauma Surgery, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic 5
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2025; 88(6): 349-356
Category: Original Paper
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn2025349

Overview

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN), with an additional focus on epidemiology, anatomical considerations linked to DBRN lesions, and complications. Materials and methodology: Records of patients surgically treated for peripheral nerve lesions were retrospectively reviewed to compile data on demographic details, anatomical location of the lesion, surgical management, outcomes, and complications. The primary outcome measure was the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC) score. Results: Twenty-two patients, comprising of 15 compressive and 7 traumatic neuropathies, were included. The median follow-up was 17.5 (14–41) months. Surgical intervention led to a significant improvement in the LSUHSC score in both the compressive (from 2 [0–3] to 4 [2–5]; P = 0.018) and the traumatic neuropathy group (from 0 [0–0] to 3 [0–4]; P = 0.011). The traumatic neuropathy group exhibited a significantly lower preoperative LSUHSC score (P = 0.004), but the difference in postoperative scores was not significant (P = 0.129). Primary surgical treatment failed in 26.7% of patients with compression and in 28.6% of patients with DBRN injury. Tendon transfer presented a viable solution for patients with failed primary treatment. Conclusion: Surgical treatment provides significant functional improvement in patients with compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the DBRN. However, a considerable percentage of patients in both groups experienced primary treatment failure. Although patients with traumatic neuropathies of the DBRN presented with a worse preoperative functional status, the postoperative outcomes between both groups were comparable.

Keywords:

neuropathy – compression – injury – palsy – deep branch of the radial nerve – posterior interosseous nerve


Sources

1. Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1978.

2. Benes M, Kachlik D, Kunc V et al. The arcade of Frohse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43 (5): 703–711. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02718-5.

3. Braun N, Save AV, Lee SK et al. Nomenclature of the radial nerve: distinguishing between the deep branch of the radial nerve and the posterior interosseous nerve. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2025; 50 (1): 122–123. doi: 10.1177/17531934241254706.

4. Ay S, Apaydin N, Acar H et al. Anatomic pattern of the terminal branches of posterior interosseous nerve. Clin Anat 2005; 18 (4): 290–295. doi: 10.1002/ca. 20114.

5. Shrestha S, Kunc V, Woo AC. Posterior interosseous nerve injury after a fracture of ulna and radius: a case report. Turk Neurosurg 2021; 31 (5): 803–806. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.32693-20.1.

6. Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Rezcallah AT et al. Posterior interosseous nerve terminal branches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 376 (376): 242–251. doi: 10.1097/00003 086-200007000-00033.

7. Anania P, Fiaschi P, Ceraudo M et al. Posterior interosseous nerve entrapments: review of the literature. Is the entrapment distal to the arcade of Frohse a really rare condition? Acta Neurochir 2018; 160 (9): 1857–1864. doi: 10.1007/s00701–00018–3615–3618.

8. Cravens G, Kline DG. Posterior interosseous nerve palsies. Neurosurgery 1990; 27 (3): 397–402. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199009000-00009.

9. Dang AC, Rodner CM. Unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, part 1: radial nerve. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (10): 1906–1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009. 10.016.

10. Hirachi K, Kato H, Minami A et al. Clinical features and management of traumatic posterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Br 1998; 23 (3): 413–417. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681 (98) 80071-5.

11. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Kim YY et al. Surgical treatment and outcomes in 45 cases of posterior interosseous nerve entrapments and injuries. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (5): 766–777. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.5.766.

12. Givissis PK, Stavridis SI, Ditsios KT et al. Isolated injury of the posterior interosseous nerve complicating a deep laceration of the proximal forearm dorsolateral muscles: a case report. J Trauma 2009; 67 (6): E194–E196. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815613d1.

13. Leechavengvongs S, Wittonchart K, Uerpairojkit C. Penetrating injury to the terminal branches of the posterior interosseous nerve with nerve grafting. J Hand Surg Br 2001; 26 (6): 293–595. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0609.

14. Shams A, El-Sayed MMH. Functional results after posterior interosseous nerve microsurgical repair. Eur Orthop Traumatol 2014; 5 (3): 305–310. doi: 10.1007/s12570–12014–0252–0254.

15. Kaiser R, Houstava L, Haninec P. Surgical treatment of supinator canal syndrome. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2013; 76/109 (5): 619–622.

16. Ochi K, Horiuchi Y, Tazaki K et al. Surgical treatment of spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy: a retrospective study of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (2): 217–222. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24748.

17. Shergill G, Bonney G, Munshi P et al. The radial and posterior interosseous nerves. results fo 260 repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (5): 646–649. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b5.11312.

18. Suematsu N, Hirayama T. Posterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Br 1998; 23 (1): 104–106. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681 (98) 80234-9.

19. Vrieling C, Robinson PH, Geertzen JHB. Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome: literature review and report of 14 cases. Eur J Plast Surg 1998; 21 : 196–202. doi: 10.1007/s002380050068.

20. Wu P, Yang JY, Chen L et al. Surgical and conservative treatments of complete spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy with hourglass-like fascicular constrictions: a retrospective study of 41 cases. Neurosurgery 2014; 75 (3): 250–257. doi: 10.1227/NEU.000000000 0000424.

21. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126 (5): 1763–1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000 002864.

22. McGraw I. Isolated spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy: a review of aetiology and management. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44 (3): 310–316. doi: 10.1177/1753193418813788.

23. Sunderamoorthy D, Chaudhury M. An uncommon peripheral nerve injury after penetrating injury of the forearm: the importance of clinical examination. Emerg Med J 2003; 20 (6): 565–566. doi: 10.1136/emj. 20.6.565.

24. Garcia-Lopez A, Navarro R, Martinez F et al. Nerve transfers from branches to the flexor carpi radialis and pronator teres to reconstruct the radial nerve. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (1): 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.10.011.

Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery

Issue 6

2025 Issue 6
Popular this week
Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#