Water Supply Interruptions and Suspected Cholera Incidence: A Time-Series Regression in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

English version České info

Background:
The eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo have been identified as endemic areas for cholera transmission, and despite continuous control efforts, they continue to experience regular cholera outbreaks that occasionally spread to the rest of the country. In a region where access to improved water sources is particularly poor, the question of which improvements in water access should be prioritized to address cholera transmission remains unresolved. This study aimed at investigating the temporal association between water supply interruptions and Cholera Treatment Centre (CTC) admissions in a medium-sized town.

Methods and Findings:
Time-series patterns of daily incidence of suspected cholera cases admitted to the Cholera Treatment Centre in Uvira in South Kivu Province between 2009 and 2014 were examined in relation to the daily variations in volume of water supplied by the town water treatment plant. Quasi-poisson regression and distributed lag nonlinear models up to 12 d were used, adjusting for daily precipitation rates, day of the week, and seasonal variations. A total of 5,745 patients over 5 y of age with acute watery diarrhoea symptoms were admitted to the CTC over the study period of 1,946 d. Following a day without tap water supply, the suspected cholera incidence rate increased on average by 155% over the next 12 d, corresponding to a rate ratio of 2.55 (95% CI: 1.54–4.24), compared to the incidence experienced after a day with optimal production (defined as the 95th percentile—4,794 m³). Suspected cholera cases attributable to a suboptimal tap water supply reached 23.2% of total admissions (95% CI 11.4%–33.2%). Although generally reporting less admissions to the CTC, neighbourhoods with a higher consumption of tap water were more affected by water supply interruptions, with a rate ratio of 3.71 (95% CI: 1.91–7.20) and an attributable fraction of cases of 31.4% (95% CI: 17.3%–42.5%). The analysis did not suggest any association between levels of residual chlorine in the water fed to the distribution network and suspected cholera incidence. Laboratory confirmation of cholera was not available for this analysis.

Conclusions:
A clear association is observed between reduced availability of tap water and increased incidence of suspected cholera in the entire town of Uvira in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Even though access to piped water supplies is low in Uvira, improving the reliability of tap water supply may substantially reduce the incidence of suspected cholera, in particular in neighbourhoods having a higher access to tap water. These results argue in favour of water supply investments that focus on the delivery of a reliable and sustainable water supply, and not only on point-of-use water quality improvements, as is often seen during cholera outbreaks.

Vyšlo v časopise: Water Supply Interruptions and Suspected Cholera Incidence: A Time-Series Regression in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS Med 12(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001893
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001893

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. World Health Organization. (2013) Weekly Epidemiological Record. 88: 321–336. 23980290

2. Bompangue D, Giraudoux P, Handschumacher P, Piarroux M, Sudre B, et al. (2008) Lakes as source of cholera outbreaks, Democratic Republic of Congo. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 798–800. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071260 18439365

3. Rebaudet S, Sudre B, Faucher B, Piarroux R (2013) Environmental determinants of cholera outbreaks in inland Africa: a systematic review of main transmission foci and propagation routes. J Infect Dis 208 Suppl 1: S46–54. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit195 24101645

4. Muyembe JJ, Bompangue D, Mutombo G, Akilimali L, Mutombo A, et al. (2013) Elimination of cholera in the democratic Republic of the Congo: the new national policy. J Infect Dis 208 Suppl 1: S86–91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit204 24101651

5. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. (2015) Estimates on the use of water sources and sanitation facilities. http://www.wssinfo.org/data-estimates/

6. Codeco CT, Coelho FC (2006) Trends in cholera epidemiology. PLoS Med 3: e42. 16435891

7. Feachem RG (1981) Environmental aspects of cholera epidemiology. I. A review of selected reports of endemic and epidemic situations during 1961–1980. Trop Dis Bull 78: 675–698. 7022972

8. Hartley DM, Morris JG Jr., Smith DL (2006) Hyperinfectivity: a critical element in the ability of V. cholerae to cause epidemics? PLoS Med 3: e7. 16318414

9. World Health Organization. Prevention and control of cholera outbreaks: WHO policy and recommendations. http://www.who.int/cholera/technical/prevention/control/en/

10. Cairncross S, Cliff JL (1987) Water use and health in Mueda, Mozambique. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 51–54. 3445322

11. Wright J, Gundry S, Conroy R (2004) Household drinking water in developing countries: a systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point-of-use. Trop Med Int Health 9: 106–117. 14728614

12. Shaheed A, Orgill J, Montgomery MA, Jeuland MA, Brown J (2014) Why "improved" water sources are not always safe. Bull World Health Organ 92: 283–289. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.119594 24700996

13. Azurin JC, Alvero M (1974) Field evaluation of environmental sanitation measures against cholera. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 51: 19–26. 4549038

14. Wolf J, Pruss-Ustun A, Cumming O, Bartram J, Bonjour S, et al. (2014) Systematic review: Assessing the impact of drinking water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings: systematic review and meta-regression. Trop Med Int Health 19: 928–942. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12331 24811732

15. Bhaskaran K, Gasparrini A, Hajat S, Smeeth L, Armstrong B (2013) Time series regression studies in environmental epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 42: 1187–1195. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt092 23760528

16. Gasparrini A (2014) Modeling exposure-lag-response associations with distributed lag non-linear models. Stat Med 33: 881–899. doi: 10.1002/sim.5963 24027094

17. Armstrong B (2006) Models for the relationship between ambient temperature and daily mortality. Epidemiology 17: 624–631. 17028505

18. Azman AS, Rudolph KE, Cummings DA, Lessler J (2013) The incubation period of cholera: a systematic review. J Infect 66: 432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.11.013 23201968

19. Gasparrini A, Leone M (2014) Attributable risk from distributed lag models. BMC Med Res Methodol 14: 55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-55 24758509

20. Gasparrini A (2011) Distributed Lag Linear and Non-Linear Models in R: The Package dlnm. J Stat Softw 43: 1–20. 22003319

21. Hunter PR, Zmirou-Navier D, Hartemann P (2009) Estimating the impact on health of poor reliability of drinking water interventions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 407: 2621–2624. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.018 19193396

22. Thompson J, Porras I, Tumwine J, Mujwahuzi M, Katui-Katua M, et al. (2000) Drawers of Water II: Thirty Years of Change in Domestic Water Use and Environmental Health in East Africa. Russell Press.

23. Spira WM, Khan MU, Saeed YA, Sattar MA (1980) Microbiological surveillance of intra-neighbourhood E1 Tor cholera transmission in rural Bangladesh. Bull World Health Organ 58: 731–740. 6975182

24. Shaheed A, Orgill J, Ratana C, Montgomery MA, Jeuland MA, et al. (2014) Water quality risks of 'improved' water sources: evidence from Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health 19: 186–194. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12229 24252094

25. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. (2013) Progress on sanitation and drinking-water: 2013 update. Geneva: World Health Organization. 39 pp.

26. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. (2014) WASH targets and indicators post-2015: Recommendations from international consultations. Comprehensive recommendations—Update April 2014. http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/post-2015-WASH-targets-factsheet-12pp.pdf

27. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, et al. (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 23245609

28. Goyal R, Patel HM (2014) Analysis of residual chlorine in simple drinking water distribution system with intermittent water supply. Applied Water Science: 1–9.

29. Kumpel E, Nelson KL (2014) Mechanisms affecting water quality in an intermittent piped water supply. Environ Sci Technol 48: 2766–2775. doi: 10.1021/es405054u 24459990

30. Page AL, Alberti KP, Mondonge V, Rauzier J, Quilici ML, et al. (2012) Evaluation of a rapid test for the diagnosis of cholera in the absence of a gold standard. PLoS One 7: e37360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037360 22666350

31. Hill AB (1965) The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proc R Soc Med 58: 295–300. 14283879