#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The Role of Viral Introductions in Sustaining Community-Based HIV Epidemics in Rural Uganda: Evidence from Spatial Clustering, Phylogenetics, and Egocentric Transmission Models


Background:
It is often assumed that local sexual networks play a dominant role in HIV spread in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which continued HIV transmission in rural communities—home to two-thirds of the African population—is driven by intra-community sexual networks versus viral introductions from outside of communities.

Methods and Findings:
We analyzed the spatial dynamics of HIV transmission in rural Rakai District, Uganda, using data from a cohort of 14,594 individuals within 46 communities. We applied spatial clustering statistics, viral phylogenetics, and probabilistic transmission models to quantify the relative contribution of viral introductions into communities versus community- and household-based transmission to HIV incidence. Individuals living in households with HIV-incident (n = 189) or HIV-prevalent (n = 1,597) persons were 3.2 (95% CI: 2.7–3.7) times more likely to be HIV infected themselves compared to the population in general, but spatial clustering outside of households was relatively weak and was confined to distances <500 m. Phylogenetic analyses of gag and env genes suggest that chains of transmission frequently cross community boundaries. A total of 95 phylogenetic clusters were identified, of which 44% (42/95) were two individuals sharing a household. Among the remaining clusters, 72% (38/53) crossed community boundaries. Using the locations of self-reported sexual partners, we estimate that 39% (95% CI: 34%–42%) of new viral transmissions occur within stable household partnerships, and that among those infected by extra-household sexual partners, 62% (95% CI: 55%–70%) are infected by sexual partners from outside their community. These results rely on the representativeness of the sample and the quality of self-reported partnership data and may not reflect HIV transmission patterns outside of Rakai.

Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that HIV introductions into communities are common and account for a significant proportion of new HIV infections acquired outside of households in rural Uganda, though the extent to which this is true elsewhere in Africa remains unknown. Our results also suggest that HIV prevention efforts should be implemented at spatial scales broader than the community and should target key populations likely responsible for introductions into communities.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: The Role of Viral Introductions in Sustaining Community-Based HIV Epidemics in Rural Uganda: Evidence from Spatial Clustering, Phylogenetics, and Egocentric Transmission Models. PLoS Med 11(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001610
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001610

Souhrn

Background:
It is often assumed that local sexual networks play a dominant role in HIV spread in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which continued HIV transmission in rural communities—home to two-thirds of the African population—is driven by intra-community sexual networks versus viral introductions from outside of communities.

Methods and Findings:
We analyzed the spatial dynamics of HIV transmission in rural Rakai District, Uganda, using data from a cohort of 14,594 individuals within 46 communities. We applied spatial clustering statistics, viral phylogenetics, and probabilistic transmission models to quantify the relative contribution of viral introductions into communities versus community- and household-based transmission to HIV incidence. Individuals living in households with HIV-incident (n = 189) or HIV-prevalent (n = 1,597) persons were 3.2 (95% CI: 2.7–3.7) times more likely to be HIV infected themselves compared to the population in general, but spatial clustering outside of households was relatively weak and was confined to distances <500 m. Phylogenetic analyses of gag and env genes suggest that chains of transmission frequently cross community boundaries. A total of 95 phylogenetic clusters were identified, of which 44% (42/95) were two individuals sharing a household. Among the remaining clusters, 72% (38/53) crossed community boundaries. Using the locations of self-reported sexual partners, we estimate that 39% (95% CI: 34%–42%) of new viral transmissions occur within stable household partnerships, and that among those infected by extra-household sexual partners, 62% (95% CI: 55%–70%) are infected by sexual partners from outside their community. These results rely on the representativeness of the sample and the quality of self-reported partnership data and may not reflect HIV transmission patterns outside of Rakai.

Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that HIV introductions into communities are common and account for a significant proportion of new HIV infections acquired outside of households in rural Uganda, though the extent to which this is true elsewhere in Africa remains unknown. Our results also suggest that HIV prevention efforts should be implemented at spatial scales broader than the community and should target key populations likely responsible for introductions into communities.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. AndersonRM, MayRM, BoilyMC, GarnettGP, RowleyJT (1991) The spread of HIV-1 in Africa: sexual contact patterns and the predicted demographic impact of AIDS. Nature 352: 581–589.

2. DohertyIA, PadianNS, MarlowC, AralSO (2005) Determinants and consequences of sexual networks as they affect the spread of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis 191(Suppl 1): S42–S54.

3. HagenaarsTJ, DonnellyCA, FergusonNM (2004) Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of infectious diseases. J Theor Biol 229: 349–359.

4. DeredecA, CourchampF (2003) Extinction thresholds in host-parasite dynamics. Ann Zool Fennici 40: 115.

5. GrosskurthH, GrayR, HayesR, MabeyD, WawerM (2000) Control of sexually transmitted diseases for HIV-1 prevention: understanding the implications of the Mwanza and Rakai trials. Lancet 355: 1981–1987.

6. WawerMJ, SewankamboNK, SerwaddaD, QuinnTC, PaxtonLA, et al. (1999) Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Lancet 353: 525–535.

7. GarnettGP, BeckerS, BertozziS (2012) Treatment as prevention: translating efficacy trial results to population effectiveness. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 7: 157–163.

8. CohenMS, MastroTD, CatesWJr (2009) Universal voluntary HIV testing and immediate antiretroviral therapy. Lancet 373: 1077.

9. EshlemanSH, HudelsonSE, ReddAD, WangL, DebesR, et al. (2011) Analysis of genetic linkage of HIV from couples enrolled in the HIV prevention trials network 052 trial. J Infect Dis 204: 1918–1926.

10. US President's Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (2012) PEPFAR blue print: creating an AIDS-free generation. Washington (District of Columbia): Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator.

11. HIV Prevention Trials Network (2012) HPTN 071: population effects of antiretroviral therapy to reduce HIV transmission (PopART): a cluster-randomized trial of the impact of a combination prevention package on population-level HIV incidence in Zambia and South Africa. Available: http://www.hptn.org/research_studies/hptn071.asp. Accessed 8 July 2013.

12. (2013) The Mochudi Prevention Project ART protocol. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01583439. Accessed 8 July 2013.

13. HayesRJ, AlexanderND, BennettS, CousensSN (2000) Design and analysis issues in cluster-randomized trials of interventions against infectious diseases. Stat Methods Med Res 9: 95–116.

14. SerwaddaD, MugerwaRD, SewankamboNK, LwegabaA, CarswellJW, et al. (1985) Slim disease: a new disease in Uganda and its association with HTLV-III infection. Lancet 2: 849–852.

15. Collinson-StrengAN, ReddAD, SewankamboNK, SerwaddaD, RezapourM, et al. (2009) Geographic HIV type 1 subtype distribution in Rakai district, Uganda. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 25: 1045–1048.

16. SaljeH, LesslerJ, EndyTP, CurrieroFC, GibbonsRV, et al. (2012) Revealing the microscale spatial signature of dengue transmission and immunity in an urban population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 9535–9538.

17. ConroySA, LaeyendeckerO, ReddAD, Collinson-StrengA, KongX, et al. (2010) Changes in the distribution of HIV type 1 subtypes D and A in Rakai district, Uganda between 1994 and 2002. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 26: 1087–1091.

18. EdgarRC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797.

19. CastresanaJ (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17: 540–552.

20. MartinDP, LemeyP, LottM, MoultonV, PosadaD, et al. (2010) RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26: 2462–2463.

21. SchultzAK, ZhangM, BullaI, LeitnerT, KorberB, et al. (2009) jpHMM: improving the reliability of recombination prediction in HIV-1. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Web Server issue): W647–W651.

22. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees [abstract]. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop; 14 Nov 2010; New Orleans, Louisiana, US.

23. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. University of Texas Digital Repository. Available: http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/2666. Accessed 8 July 2013.

24. RonquistF, TeslenkoM, van der MarkP, AyresDL, DarlingA, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61: 539–542.

25. ReynoldsSJ, MakumbiF, NakigoziG, KagaayiJ, GrayRH, et al. (2011) HIV-1 transmission among HIV-1 discordant couples before and after the introduction of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 25: 473–477.

26. BeckerKM, GlassGE, BrathwaiteW, ZenilmanJM (1998) Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Baltimore, Maryland, using a geographic information system. Am J Epidemiol 147: 709–716.

27. BellanSE, FiorellaKJ, MelesseDY, GetzWM, WilliamsBG, et al. (2013) Extra-couple HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: a mathematical modelling study of survey data. Lancet 381: 1561–1569.

28. DunkleKL, StephensonR, KaritaE, ChombaE, KayitenkoreK, et al. (2008) New heterosexually transmitted HIV infections in married or cohabiting couples in urban Zambia and Rwanda: an analysis of survey and clinical data. Lancet 371: 2183–2191.

29. HollingsworthTD, AndersonRM, FraserC (2008) HIV-1 transmission, by stage of infection. J Infect Dis 198: 687–693.

30. WawerMJ, GrayRH, SewankamboNK, SerwaddaD, LiX, et al. (2005) Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis 191: 1403–1409.

31. NunnAJ, WagnerHU, KamaliA, Kengeya-KayondoJF, MulderDW (1995) Migration and HIV-1 seroprevalence in a rural Ugandan population. AIDS 9: 503–506.

32. PisonG, Le GuennoB, LagardeE, EnelC, SeckC (1993) Seasonal migration: a risk factor for HIV infection in rural Senegal. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 6: 196–200.

33. ReadJM, KeelingMJ (2003) Disease evolution on networks: the role of contact structure. Proc Biol Sci 270: 699–708.

34. MessingerSM, OstlingA (2009) The consequences of spatial structure for the evolution of pathogen transmission rate and virulence. Am Nat 174: 441–454.

35. KeelingMJ, WoolhouseME, ShawDJ, MatthewsL, Chase-ToppingM, et al. (2001) Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 294: 813–817.

36. TanserF, BarnighausenT, HundL, GarnettGP, McGrathN, et al. (2011) Effect of concurrent sexual partnerships on rate of new HIV infections in a high-prevalence, rural South African population: a cohort study. Lancet 378: 247–255.

37. DasM, ChuPL, SantosGM, ScheerS, VittinghoffE, et al. (2010) Decreases in community viral load are accompanied by reductions in new HIV infections in San Francisco. PLoS ONE 5: e11068.

38. Uganda Bureau of Statistics, ICF International (2012) Uganda demographic and Health survey 2011. Fairfax (Virginia): ICF International.

39. HughesGJ, FearnhillE, DunnD, LycettSJ, RambautA, et al. (2009) Molecular phylodynamics of the heterosexual HIV epidemic in the United Kingdom. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000590.

40. YirrellDL, PickeringH, PalmariniG, HamiltonL, RutemberwaA, et al. (1998) Molecular epidemiological analysis of HIV in sexual networks in Uganda. AIDS 12: 285–290.

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2014 Číslo 3
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#