#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Artificial intelligence in imaging methods


Authors: Lukáš Lambert;  Vojtěch Suchánek;  Lukáš Mikšík;  Jana Svítilová
Authors‘ workplace: Klinika zobrazovacích metod, Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, 2. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
Published in: Čes-slov Pediat 2025; 80 (5): 219-225.
Category:
doi: https://doi.org/10.55095/cspediatrie2025/042

Overview

Lambert L, Suchánek V, Mikšík L, Svítilová J. Artificial intelligence in imaging methods

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced novel opportunities in diagnostic imaging, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient comfort. While AI concepts have existed for decades, only recent improvements in computational power have enabled their widespread integration into clinical workflows. This article reviews key applications of AI in pediatric radiology—a field where the limited availability of high-quality annotated training data remains a major constraint.

AI technologies are being deployed across various stages of the imaging process: from optimizing examination requests and scheduling, through contactless biometric monitoring during acquisition, to advanced image reconstruction techniques that enable reduced radiation exposure and shorter scan times. In image interpretation, AI supports pathology detection, facilitates quantitative assessments (e.g., skeletal age estimation, anthropometric analysis), and aids in the standardization and clearer communication of findings to both clinicians and patients.

While AI cannot substitute the clinical expertise of trained radiologists, its complementary role is steadily expanding, offering substantial benefits across various aspects of imaging practice. Nonetheless, significant challenges remain—particularly in the domains of ethical governance, diagnostic accountability, and long-term economic sustainability.

Keywords:

computed tomography – artificial intelligence – magnetic resonance imaging – X-ray – pediatric radiology – contrast media


Sources

1. Hua SB, Heller N, He P, et al. Lack of children in public medical imaging data points to growing age bias in biomedical AI. medRxiv 2025.06.06.2532891.

2. Dillman JR, Somasundaram E, Brady SL, et al. Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric abdominal imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52(11): 2139–2148.

3. Otjen JP, Moore MM, Romberg EK, et al. The current and future roles of artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52(11): 2065–2073.

4. Hull NC, Frush DP, Chu WC, et al. Pediatric Imaging 2040. Radiology 2025; 315(2): e250378.

5. Valenzuela-Núñez C, Latorre-Núñez G, Troncoso-Espinosa F. Smart medical appointment scheduling: Optimization, machine learning, and overbooking to enhance resource utilization. IEEE Access 2024; 12 : 7551–7562.

6. Rasche A, Brader P, Borggrefe J, et al. Impact of intelligent virtual and AI-based automated collimation functionalities on the efficiency of radiographic acquisitions. Radiography. 2024;30(4):1073–9.

7. Zhang F, Peng L, Zhang G, et al. Artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for dose reduction in pediatric chest CT: a clinical assessment via below 3 years patients with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Imag 2025; 40(4): e0827.

8. Choi JW, Cho YJ, Lee SB, et al. Accelerated brain magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning reconstruction: a comparative study on image quality in pediatric neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol 2025 : 1–2. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06314-2

9. Pocepcova V, Zellner M, Callaghan F, et al. Deep learning-based denoising image reconstruction of body magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 2025; 55(6): 1235–1244.

10. Ashworth E, Allan E, Pauling C, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological paediatric fracture assessment: An updated systematic review. Eur Radiol 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11449-9

11. Guermazi A, Tannoury C, Kompel AJ, et al. Improving radiographic fracture recognition performance and efficiency using artificial intelligence. Radiology 2022; 302(3): 627–636.

12. Monti CB, Bianchi LM, Rizzetto F, et al. Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence model for the detection of pneumothorax at chest X-ray. Clin Imaging 2025; 117 : 110355.

13. Nguyen T, Hermann AL, Ventre J, et al. High performance for bone age estimation with an artificial intelligence solution. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104(7–8): 330–336.

14. Lassalle L, Regnard NE, Ventre J, et al. Automated weight-bearing foot measurements using an artificial intelligence–based software. Skeletal Radiol 2025; 54(2): 229–41.

15. Phan TV, Sima DM, Beelen C. et al. Evaluation of methods for volumetric analysis of pediatric brain data: The Childmetrix pipeline versus adult-based approaches. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 19 : 734–744.

16. Bhayana R. Chatbots and large language models in radiology: a practical primer for clinical and research applications. Radiology 2024; 310(1): e232756.

17. Ahmadzade M, Morón FE, Shastri R, et al. AI-assisted post contrast brain MRI: eighty percent reduction in contrast dose. Academic Radiology 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.026

18. Khanna NN, Maindarkar MA, Viswanathan V, et al. Economics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: diagnosis vs. treatment. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10(12): 2493.

Labels
Neonatology Paediatrics General practitioner for children and adolescents

Article was published in

Czech-Slovak Pediatrics


2025 Issue 5
Popular this week
Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#