#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study


Background:
Current methods of measuring the population burden of injuries rely on many assumptions and limited data available to the global burden of diseases (GBD) studies. The aim of this study was to compare the population burden of injuries using different approaches from the UK Burden of Injury (UKBOI) and GBD studies.

Methods and Findings:
The UKBOI was a prospective cohort of 1,517 injured individuals that collected patient-reported outcomes. Extrapolated outcome data were combined with multiple sources of morbidity and mortality data to derive population metrics of the burden of injury in the UK. Participants were injured patients recruited from hospitals in four UK cities and towns: Swansea, Nottingham, Bristol, and Guildford, between September 2005 and April 2007. Patient-reported changes in quality of life using the EQ-5D at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 months after injury provided disability weights used to calculate the years lived with disability (YLDs) component of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). DALYs were calculated for the UK and extrapolated to global estimates using both UKBOI and GBD disability weights. Estimated numbers (and rates per 100,000) for UK population extrapolations were 750,999 (1,240) for hospital admissions, 7,982,947 (13,339) for emergency department (ED) attendances, and 22,185 (36.8) for injury-related deaths in 2005. Nonadmitted ED-treated injuries accounted for 67% of YLDs. Estimates for UK DALYs amounted to 1,771,486 (82% due to YLDs), compared with 669,822 (52% due to YLDs) using the GBD approach. Extrapolating patient-derived disability weights to GBD estimates would increase injury-related DALYs 2.6-fold.

Conclusions:
The use of disability weights derived from patient experiences combined with additional morbidity data on ED-treated patients and inpatients suggests that the absolute burden of injury is higher than previously estimated. These findings have substantial implications for improving measurement of the national and global burden of injury.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study. PLoS Med 8(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001140
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001140

Souhrn

Background:
Current methods of measuring the population burden of injuries rely on many assumptions and limited data available to the global burden of diseases (GBD) studies. The aim of this study was to compare the population burden of injuries using different approaches from the UK Burden of Injury (UKBOI) and GBD studies.

Methods and Findings:
The UKBOI was a prospective cohort of 1,517 injured individuals that collected patient-reported outcomes. Extrapolated outcome data were combined with multiple sources of morbidity and mortality data to derive population metrics of the burden of injury in the UK. Participants were injured patients recruited from hospitals in four UK cities and towns: Swansea, Nottingham, Bristol, and Guildford, between September 2005 and April 2007. Patient-reported changes in quality of life using the EQ-5D at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 months after injury provided disability weights used to calculate the years lived with disability (YLDs) component of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). DALYs were calculated for the UK and extrapolated to global estimates using both UKBOI and GBD disability weights. Estimated numbers (and rates per 100,000) for UK population extrapolations were 750,999 (1,240) for hospital admissions, 7,982,947 (13,339) for emergency department (ED) attendances, and 22,185 (36.8) for injury-related deaths in 2005. Nonadmitted ED-treated injuries accounted for 67% of YLDs. Estimates for UK DALYs amounted to 1,771,486 (82% due to YLDs), compared with 669,822 (52% due to YLDs) using the GBD approach. Extrapolating patient-derived disability weights to GBD estimates would increase injury-related DALYs 2.6-fold.

Conclusions:
The use of disability weights derived from patient experiences combined with additional morbidity data on ED-treated patients and inpatients suggests that the absolute burden of injury is higher than previously estimated. These findings have substantial implications for improving measurement of the national and global burden of injury.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. Segui-GomezMMacKenzieEJ 2003 Measuring the public health impact of injuries. Epidemiol Rev 25 3 19

2. WiebeDJNanceMLBranasCC 2006 Determining objective injury prevention priorities. Inj Prev 12 347 350

3. MurrayCJLLopezAD 1996 The global burden of disease and injury series, volume 1: the global burden of disease Geneva World Health Organization

4. MurrayCJLLopezAD 1997 Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 349 1436 1442

5. MathersCDLopezADMurrayCJL 2006 The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. LopezADMathersCDEzzatiMJamisonDTMurrayCJL Global burden of disease and risk factors Washington (D.C.) Oxford University Press and The World Bank 45 240

6. World Health Organization 2008 The Global Burden of Disease 2004 Update Geneva World Health Organization

7. HolstagHRvan BeeckEFLichtveldRALeenenLPHLindemanE 2008 Individual and population burdens of major trauma in the Netherlands. Bull World Health Organ 86 111 117

8. MathersCDVosETStevensonCEBeggSJ 2001 The burden of disease and injury in Australia. Bull World Health Organ 79 1076 1084

9. CorsoPFinkelsteinEMillerTFiebelkornIZaloshnjaE 2006 Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev 12 212 218

10. MichaudCMMcKennaMTBeggSNielsTMeghnaM 2006 The burden of disease and injury in the United States 1996. Popul Health Metr 4 11

11. NormanRMatzopoulosRGroenewaldPBradshawD 2007 The high burden of injuries in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 85 695 702

12. StevensGDiasRHThomasKJARiveraJACarvalhoN 2008 Characterizing the epidemiological transition in Mexico: national and subnational burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. PLoS Med 5 e125 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050125

13. NaghaviMAbolhassaniFPourmalekFLakehMMJafari1N 2009 The burden of disease and injury in Iran 2003. Popul Health Metr 7 9

14. PolinderSMeerdingWJMulderSPetridouEvan BeeckE and the EUROCOST Reference Group 2007 Assessing the burden of injury in six European countries. Bull World Health Organ 85 27 34

15. World Bank 1993 World Development Report, Investing in health New York Oxford University Press

16. LyonsRA 2008 Measuring the burden of injury. Inj Prev 14 3 4

17. LyonsRATownerEMKendrickDChristieNBrophyS 2007 The UK Burden of injury study - a protocol. BMC Public Health 7 317

18. CryerCLangleyJD 2006 Developing valid indicators of injury incidence for “all injury.” Inj Prev 12 202 207

19. GriffithsCWrightORooneyC 2006 Trends in injury and poisoning mortality using the ICE on injury statistics matrix, England and Wales, 1979–2004. Office for National Statistics. Health Stat Q 32 5 18

20. BrooksR 1996 EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37 53 7221

21. FeenyDFurlongWBoyleMTorranceGW 1995 Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 7 490 502

22. VarniJWSeidMRodeCA 1999 The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 37 126 139

23. LernerDAmickBCIIIRogersWHMalspeisSBungayK 2001 The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care 39 72 85

24. AndresenEMVahleVJLollarD 2001 Proxy reliability: health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability. Qual Life Res 10 609 619

25. GabbeBJSimpsonPMSutherlandAMPalmerCSButtW 2010 Agreement between parent and child report of health-related quality of life: Impact of time postinjury. J Trauma 69 1578 1582

26. EricksonSJMontagueEQGerstleMA 2010 Health-related quality of life in children with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurorehabil 13 175 181

27. WeinfurtKPTruccoSMWillkeRJSchulmanKA 2002 Measuring agreement between patient and proxy responses to multidimensional health-related quality-of-life measures in clinical trials: an application of psychometric profile analysis. J Clinl Epidemiol 55 608 618

28. PockettRDLyonsRA 2006 The AWISS - SitReps injury extrapolation factor methodology July, 2006. Available: http://www.capic.org.uk/documents/060730AWISS-SitrepsMethodRPandRL.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2009

29. AlexandrescuRO'BrienSJLyonsRALeckyFE 2008 A proposed approach in defining population-based rates of major injury from a trauma registry dataset: delineation of hospital catchment areas. BMC Health Serv Res 8 80

30. LyonsRABrophySPockettRJohnG 2005 Purpose, development and use of injury indicators. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 4 207 211

31. CryerCGulliverPDavieGde GraafBLangleyJ 2010 Empirical validation of the New Zealand injury prevention strategy indicators: the identification of ICD diagnoses associated with a high probability of inpatient hospital admission Dunedin Injury Prevention Research Unit. ISBN: 0-908958-83-8

32. MeerdingWJLoomanCWNEssink-BotMLToetHMulderS 2004 Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma 56 150 161

33. HaagsmaJAvan BeeckEFPolinderSHoeymansNMulderS 2008 Novel empirical disability weights to assess the burden of non-fatal injury. Inj Prev 14 5 10

34. Van BeeckEFLarsenCFLyonsRAMeerdingWJMulderS 2007 Guidelines for the conduction of follow-up studies measuring injury-related disability. J Trauma 62 534 550

35. HaagsmaJAPolinderSvan BeeckEFMulderSBonselGJ 2009 Alternative approaches to derive disability weights in injuries: do they make a difference? Qual Life Res 18 657 665

36. DolanP 1997 Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35 1095 1108

37. GennarelliThomasA Elaine Wodzin (Hrsg.) 2008 The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005. Update 2008 Des Plaines (Illinois) American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM)

38. PedenMOyegbiteKOzanne-SmithJHyderAABrancheC 2008 World Report on Child Injury Prevention Geneva World Health Organisation Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563574_eng.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2009

39. PolinderSHaagsmaJABeltELyonsRAErasmusV 2010 A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations. BMC Public Health 10 783

40. HolbrookTLAndersonJPSieberWJBrownerDHoytDB 1999 Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma 46 765 771

41. Baldry CurrensJCoatsT 2000 The timing of disability measurements following injury. Injury 31 93 98

42. VlesWJSteyerbergEWEssink-BotMLvan BeeckEFMeeuwisJD 2005 Prevalence and determinants of disabilities and return to work after major trauma. J Trauma 58 126 135

43. KaarlolaAPettiläVKekkiP 2003 Quality of life six years after intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29 1294 1299

44. MacKenzieEJBosseMJPollakANWebbLXSwiontkowskiMF 2005 Long-term persistence of disability following severe lower-limb trauma: results of a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 1801 1809

45. BhallaKHarrisonJAbrahamJBorseNNLyonsR 2009 Data sources for improving estimates of the global burden of injuries: call for contributors. PLoS Med 6 e1000001 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000001

46. KendrickDLyonsRChristieNTownerEBengerJ 2007 Recruiting participants for injury studies in emergency departments. Inj Prev 13 75 77

47. PolinderSvan BeeckEFEssink-BotMLToetHLoomanCWN 2007 Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma 62 133 141

48. BarkerMPowerCRobertsI 1996 Injuries and the risk of disability in teenagers and young adults. Arch Dis Child 75 156 158

49. MockCAcheampongFAdjeiSKoepsellT 1999 The effect of recall on estimation of incidence rates for injury in Ghana. Int J Epidemiol 28 750 755

50. SheenCLDillonJFBatemanDNSimpsonKJMacdonaldTM 2002 Paracetamol toxicity: epidemiology, prevention and costs to the health-care system. QJM 95 609 619

51. CameronCMKliewerEVPurdieDMMcClureRJ 2007 Long-term mortality following injury in working-age adults: a systematic review. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 14 11 18

52. WatsonWLOzanne-SmithJRichardsonJ 2007 Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses. Inj Prev 13 45 50

53. GabbeBJCameronPAGravesSEWilliamsonODEdwardsER 2007 Preinjury status: are orthopaedic trauma patients different than the general population? J Orthop Trauma 21 223 228

54. WatsonWLOzanne-SmithJRichardsonJ 2007 Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses. Inj Prev 13 45 50

55. PolinderSHaagsmaJABonselGEssink-BotMLToetH 2010 The measurement of long-term health-related quality of life after injury: comparison of EQ-5D and the health utilities index. Inj Prev 16 147 153

56. LyonsRA 2010 Measuring quality of life after injury. Inj Prev 16 145 146

57. StucklerDKingLMcKeeM 2008 WHO's budgetary allocations and burden of disease: a comparative analysis. Lancet 372 1536 1569

58. NichollJP 2006 Health research funding: while injuries were ignored. BMJ 332 1510

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2011 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#