The role of dynamic MRI defecography in the diagnostic algorithm of patients with anorectal dysfunction

Czech version

Authors: A. Berková ¹; P. Vlček ¹; V. Červeňák ²; I. Krejčová ¹; T. Vystrčilová ¹; J. Dolina ³; M. Szypulová ⁴; S. Tvarožek ⁴; M. Jurášková ⁵; Z. Chovanec ¹; I. Penka ¹
Authors‘ workplace: I. chirurgická klinika, LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně ¹; Klinika zobrazovacích metod, LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně ²; Interní gastroenterologická, klinika LF MU a FN Brno ³; Gynekologicko-porodnická, klinika LF MU a FN Brno ⁴; Rehabilitační klinika, LF MU a FN Brno ⁵
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2025, roč. 104, č. 7, s. 275-282.
Category: Original articles
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025275

Overview

Introduction and aim: For a correct assessment of anorectal dysfunction, adequate physical and imaging examinations are required. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of MRI defecography in patients with anorectal dysfunction. Its comparison with anorectal manometry, standard clinical examination, and patients’ subjective perceptions.

Type of study: An observational, retrospective analysis.

Methods: Forty patients with symptoms of anorectal dysfunction referred to a colorectal clinic between 9/2022 and 5/2023 participated in the study. All underwent proctological examination, anorectal manometry and MRI defecography. The results of the study were statistically processed with Statistica 12.0 software.

Results: The average age of the patients was 55 years. Primary complaints were obstipation in 60% of patients, fecal incontinence in 33%, 1 patient had proctalgia and 2 patients presented for rectal prolapse. On clinical examination, 20% of patients had rectoanal intussusception and 15% had complete rectal prolapse. A total of 36% of patients reported concomitant urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor drop in the anterior compartment was also demonstrated in patients who had physiological internal sphincter function according to anorectal manometry, however, due to the small sample size, only a trend was observed and statistical significance of these differences was not reached (P = 0.109). Patients without evidence of obstructive defecation syndrome on anorectal manometry had complete rectal emptying on MRI defecography (P = 0.0598).

Conclusion: Dynamic MRI defecography can identify anatomical and functional abnormalities of the pelvic floor. The main use of the method is in the detection of multi-compartment pathology. Multidisciplinary collaboration is required to interpret the results and establish an accurate diagnosis.

Keywords:

pelvic floor – Incontinence – obstructive defecation syndrome – anorectal dysfunction – dynamic MRI defecography

Sources

1. Tim S, Mazur-Bialy AI. The most common functional disorders and factors affecting female pelvic floor. Life 2021; 11(12): 1397. doi: 10.3390/life11121397.

2. Oom DM, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR. Enterocele –⁠ diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2009; 33(2): 135–137. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2009.01.001.

3. Malaekah H, Al Medbel HS, Al Mowallad S et al. Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Womens Health 2022; 18: 174550652110722. doi: 10.1177/ 17455065211072252.

4. McNevin MS. Overview of pelvic floor disorders. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90(1): 195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.10.003.

5. Lalwani N, El Sayed RF, Kamath A et al. Imaging and clinical assessment of functional defecatory disorders with emphasis on defecography. Abdom Radiol 2021; 46(4): 1323–1333. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02142-9.

6. Faccioli N, Comai A, Mainardi P et al. Defecography: a practical approach. Diagn Interv Radiol 2010; 16(3): 209–216. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2584-09.1.

7. Reginelli A, Di Grezia G, Gatta G et al. Role of conventional radiology and MRI defecography of pelvic floor hernias. BMC Surg 2013; 13(Suppl 2): S53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S53.

8. Gilyadova A, Ishchenko A, Puchkova E et al. Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) of the Pelvic Floor in Genital Prolapses. Biomedicines 2023; 11(10): 2849. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102849.

9. Maccioni F, Alt CD. MRI of the Pelvic Floor and MR Defecography. In: Hodler J, Kubik-Huch RA, von Schulthess GK (eds). Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2018–2021: Diagnostic Imaging –⁠ IDKD Book. Cham (CH): Springer 2018 : 13–20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75019-4-2.

10. Maccioni F. Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38(5): 930–951. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9955-6.

11. Schey R, Cromwell J, Rao SS. Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107(11): 1624–1633. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.247.

12. Červeňák V, Berková A, Vlček P. Naše zkušenosti s dynamickou MR defekografií. Gastroenterologia pre prax 2023; 22(1): 24–27.

13. Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Hayashi K et al. Proctographic findings and symptoms in patients with anterior rectoanal intussusception. J Anus Rectum Colon 2018; 1(4): 112–117. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2017-014.

14. Salvador JC, Coutinho MP, Venâncio JM et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2019; 10(1): 4. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0687-9.

15. Ganesh S, Kumar M. Physiotherapist management of a patient with spastic perineal syndrome and subsequent constipation: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract 2021; 37(1): 242–251. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1603259.

16. Vlismas LJ, Wu W, Ho V. Idiopathic slow transit constipation: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Medicina 2024; 60(1): 108. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010108.

17. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Rahimi S et al. Age- -related pelvic floor modifications and prolapse risk factors in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2010; 17(1): 204–212. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181b0c2ae.

18. van Reijn-Baggen D, Han-Geurts I, Voorham-van der Zalm P et al. Pelvic floor physical therapy for pelvic floor hypertonicity: a systematic review of treatment efficacy. Sex Med Rev 2022; 10(2): 209–230. doi: 10.1016/ j.sxmr.2021.03.002.

19. Zbar AP. Posterior pelvic floor disorders and obstructed defecation syndrome: clinical and therapeutic approach. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38(5): 894–902. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9878-2.

20. Li M, Jiang T, Peng P et al. MR defecography in assessing functional defecation disorder: diagnostic value of the defecation phase in detection of dyssynergic defecation and pelvic floor prolapse in females. Digestion 2019; 100(2): 109–116. doi: 10.1159/000494249.

21. Black CJ, Ford AC. Chronic idiopathic constipation in adults: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Med J Aust 2018; 209(2): 86–91. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00241.

22. Ajimsha MS, Ismail LA, Al-Mudahka N et al. Effectiveness of external myofascial mobilisation in the management of male chronic pelvic pain of muscle spastic type: a retrospective study. Arab J Urol 2021; 19(3): 394–400. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1954414.

23. Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S et al. The accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47(9): 1533–1538. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0626-8.

24. Blaker K, Anandam JL. Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(1): 5–11. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593433.

25. Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 2011; 258(1): 23–39. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092367.

26. Takano S, Sands DR. Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” psition. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20(2): 117–121. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1402-6.

27. Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C et al. MR defecography in patients with fecal incontinence: imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology 2006; 240(2): 449–457. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2401050648.

28. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A et al. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 1997; 7(8): 1309–1317. doi: 10.1007/s003300050294.

29. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB et al. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 1991; 179(1): 25–33. doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006286.

30. Kanmaniraja D, Arif-Tiwari H, Palmer SL et al. MR defecography review. Abdom Radiol 2021; 46(4): 1334–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02228-4.

31. Rosenkrantz AB, Lewis MT, Yalamanchili S et al. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines. Clin Radiol 2014; 69(2): e71–e77. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.015.

32. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS et al. Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174(1): 81–88. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740081.

33. Pannu HK, Scatarige JC, Eng J. Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33(1): 125–130. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318161d739.

34. Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Caruso Lombardi A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating functional disorders of female pelvic floor. Radiol Med 2002; 103(5–6): 488–500.

35. Rentsch M, Paetzel Ch, Lenhart M et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44(7): 999–1007. doi: 10.1007/BF02235489.

36. Matsuoka H, Wexner SD, Desai MB et al. A comparison between dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and videoproctography in patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44(4): 571–576. doi: 10.1007/BF02234331.

MUDr. Petr Vlček, Ph.D.

I. chirurgická klinika

LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně

Pekařská 664/53

602 00 Brno

petr.vlcek@fnusa.cz

ORCID autorů

A. Berková 0000-0003-2787-0076

P. Vlček 0000-0002-7344-9752

I. Krejčová 0009-0001-9261-1727

J. Dolina 0000-0002-9061-5273

M. Szypulová 0000-0001-5458-2139