Spatial distribution of breast cancer in Sudan 2010-2016
Marwa Maweya Abdelbagi Elbasheer aff001; Ayah Galal Abdelrahman Alkhidir aff002; Siham Mohammed Awad Mohammed aff003; Areej Abuelgasim Hassan Abbas aff004; Aisha Osman Mohamed aff001; Isra Mahgoub Bereir aff002; Hiba Reyad Abdalazeez aff005; Mounkaila Noma aff006
Authors place of work:
Department of Histopathology & Cytology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan
aff001; Sudanese Medical Council, Khartoum, Sudan
aff002; Zanam Specialist Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan
aff003; Sudanese Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, Sudan
aff004; Sudanese National Council for Medical & Health Professions, Khartoum, Sudan
aff005; University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among females worldwide including Sudan. The aim of this study was to determine the spatial distribution of breast cancer in Sudan.
Materials and methods
A facility based cross-sectional study was implemented in eighteen histopathology laboratories distributed in the three localities of Khartoum State on a sample of 4630 Breast Cancer cases diagnosed during the period 2010–2016. A master database was developed through Epi InfoTM 184.108.40.206 for computerizing the data collected: the facility name, type (public or private), and its geo-location (latitude and longitude). Personal data on patients were extracted from their respective medical records (name, age, marital status, ethnic group, state, locality, administrative unit, permanent address and phone number, histopathology diagnosis). The data was summarized through SPSS to generate frequency tables for estimating prevalence and the geographical information system (ArcGIS 10.3) was used to generate the epidemiological distribution maps. ArcGIS 10.3 spatial analysis features were used to develop risk maps based on the kriging method.
Breast cancer prevalence was 3.9 cases per 100,000 female populations. Of the 4423 cases of breast cancer, invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (NST) was the most frequent (79.5%, 3517/4423) histopathological diagnosis. The spatial analysis indicated as high risk areas for breast cancer in Sudan the States of Nile River, Northern, Red Sea, White Nile, Northern and Southern Kordofan.
The attempt to develop a predictive map of breast cancer in Sudan revealed three levels of risk areas (risk, intermediate and high risk areas); regardless the risk level, appropriate preventive and curative health interventions with full support from decision makers are urgently needed.
Medicine and health sciences – Oncology – Cancers and neoplasms – Breast tumors – Breast cancer – Pathology and laboratory medicine – Anatomical pathology – Histopathology – Diagnostic medicine – Cancer detection and diagnosis – Epidemiology – Cancer epidemiology – People and places – Geographical locations – Africa – Sudan – Biology and life sciences – Population biology – Population dynamics – Geographic distribution – Computer and information sciences – Earth sciences – Geography – Geoinformatics – Geographic information systems – Marine and aquatic sciences – Bodies of water – Red Sea
Breast cancer (BC) is a disease characterized by different pathologies, biological characteristics and clinical behaviors. It is the leading cancer among females worldwide with 641,000 cases reported in 1980 and 1,643,000 cases in 2010; the annual incidence increase between the two years was 3.1% . In the year 2015 the WHO reported 571000 deaths from BC  while in 2018 it represented 24.2% of all cancers and 15% of deaths due to cancer among females . Furthermore by the year 2020, 1.7 million new cases are expected mostly in the developing countries . The recent shift in its burden in the developing world is revealed by a high mortality rate and a poorer overall survival [2, 4]. The geographical distribution of BC in Africa revealed a marked variation in incidence within the continent with a high incidence rate of 130 cases per 100,000 in Northern African countries and a lowest rate of 95 cases per 100,000 recorded in the Western part of the African continent . The highest standardized mortality rate worldwide according to WHO six regions was found in the East Mediterranean Office (EMRO) and Africa Regional Office (AFRO) with respectively 18.6% and 17.2% . On the other hand breast cancer among males is still considered a rare condition, representing 1% of the total breast cancer patients in Europe compared to over 6% in Central African countries .
Sudan is third largest African country in terms of geographical range with an estimated population of 41 million, of which 33.7% were reported living in urban areas. Health services in Sudan are provided by the Federal and State Ministries of Heath, military, police, universities, and private sectors. There are over 100,000 health workers in Sudan with a doctor to nurse ratio of 1:2.5 as reported in 2013. Sudan has one physician for every 3,333 people according to a World Bank report, placing the country within the critical shortage zone according to the WHO criteria of 2.28 health care professionals per 1000 population. There is an inequitable and uneven geographical distribution of the health workforce in Sudan. According to the 2006 survey report, nearly 70% of health personnel work in urban settings serving about 30% of the total country’s population and more than one-third of the total health workforce was located in the capital city. Around 67% of health worker staff is working in secondary and tertiary facilities, as opposed to only 33% in primary healthcare settings . There are three public cancer centers in Sudan; the Radiation Isotope Center Khartoum (RICK), Gezira Institute for Cancer treatment and Molecular Biology (GICMB), and Shendi Cancer Center .
In Sudan, the burden of cancer had increased from 303 cases in 1967 to 6303 in 2010 in which BC represented the most common cancer . Further studies [11, 12] reported that the highest prevalence of cancers was recorded in the States of Khartoum, North Kordufan, Nile River, Northern, Gezira and White Nile states and BC was the most prevalent. According to the records of the Radiation Isotope Center Khartoum (RICK) and Gezira Institute for Cancer treatment and Molecular Biology (GICMB), BC was the most predominant malignancy among females with respectively 29–34.5% and 30.0% of the cancers registered. Most cases were young-aged women. About 40% were below 45 years (mean age of 50) with late advanced disease. On the other hand, male cancer constituted 3.5–4% [10, 13]. Furthermore, studies from Red Sea State (2003–2006) and Central Sudan (1999–2006) revealed that the majority of the patients were premenopausal women (age <50 years) who presented with a late stage metastasized disease [14, 15].
A study  was conducted based on 6771 cases of cancers diagnosed in Khartoum State by Sudan First National Cancer registry during the period 2009 to 2010. The findings revealed that the most common cancer was breast cancer with an incidence rate of 25.1 per 100,000. The study also reported the possibility of underestimation of the affliction which could be due to factors such as stigmatization and poverty, leading to undiagnosed or untreated cases. Overestimation was also pointed out for elderly patients who might be treated symptomatically at primary care levels or died before reaching cancer specialized institutions.
Currently there are no significant ongoing activities in cancer control at the primary level, and screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic services are only being provided as secondary and tertiary care, indicating a weak referral system and links . In addition to that there is a shortage in the number of cancer centers in Sudan, fallings below the recommendations set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) , which recommends one center for every 2–5 millions of population. Furthermore the public cancer centers are clustered in the central states of Sudan which limits access for patients living in the peripheral parts of the country .
Available statistics on breast cancer in Sudan are mostly restricted to central institutions such as RICK and GICMB and the geographical distribution of the disease yet is unknown. This paper aimed to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer and determine its spatial distribution country-wide.
This study’s ethical clearance was obtained from Khartoum State Ministry of Health, Directorate of innovation and Scientific research Ethical Committee on 11th May 2017 following the approval of the research proposal discussed with the Research Review Board of Scientific Research of The Ministry. The committee waived the need of consent from the patients based on the following: Some laboratories registration system lacks information related to contact phone numbers hence then the consent will not be applicable for those patients.
Personal information of the patients were collected to enable access to the patients for the community phase and to avoid duplicate of patients across the histopathology laboratories as patients could use more than one histopathology laboratory. Both the Ministry and the histopathology laboratories were fully aware of the importance to have a Breast Cancer Registry and all the data extracted have a unique identification code.
Verbal consent was obtained from each of the patients involved in the community survey (manuscript being drafted to submit for publication). The verbal consent was obtained from each participant through a telephone interview after introducing the topic and explaining to the participants their full freedom to participate or not in the study and their right to not answer any of the questions they didn’t wish to do so. Hence we have obtained the verbal consent of all the patients who were included in the community survey. For those who were lost, a co-patient freely accepted to take the interview following a well informed consent".
Study design and population
A facility based cross-sectional study was implemented. Data were extracted from eighteen histopathology laboratories within Khartoum State (Fig 1). In each of these laboratories, data collected included facility name, type (public or private), and geo-location (latitude and longitude). Personal data extracted from the facility records were name, age, marital status, ethnic group, state, locality, administrative unit, permanent address and phone number. Other information obtained from the records included the date of diagnosis and the histopathology diagnosis. Information regarding ethnic and socioeconomic status of the patients was excluded during analysis due to the considerable amount of missing data from the records.
Data management and analysis
The master database, consisting of 4630 patient medical records was developed through Epi InfoTM 220.127.116.11 and thereafter filtered through the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 23) to exclude cases lacking important information such as the histopathology diagnosis, and date of diagnosis, as well as duplicated cases which were entered twice. The data of the remaining 4423 records was then summarized through SPSS to generate the frequency distribution of the cases in terms of person (age, gender) and type of cancer diagnosed by the histopathology centers. Histopathology diagnoses recorded were invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, carcinoma in situ and others, which were then regrouped to fit WHO 2012 classification . The epidemiological distribution of breast cancer in Sudan was based on 1135 records for which data on residence were available. Those 1135 records were geo-referenced to facilitate the plotting of the residence of the patients. Prevalence was estimated using the updated 2016 Sudan Census Bureau and Statistics population data as a reference. ArcGIS 10.3 spatial analysis features were used to develop a risk map based on the kriging method .
The geographical information system, ArcGIS 10.3 for Desktop version 10.3.043322, was used to generate the geographical distribution and risk maps of breast cancer. The risk map of Cancer was developed by using the kriging method of data interpolation. This method is based on the semivariogram which captures the spatial dependence between samples by plotting semivariance against separation distance. The premise of any spatial interpolation is that close samples tend to be more similar than distant samples (this is also called spatial autocorrelation). This property of spatial data is implicitly used in inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation to determine cell values using a linearly weighted combination of a set of sample points. Inverse distance weighted (IDW) is a method of interpolation that estimates cell values by averaging the values of sample data points in the neighborhood of each processing cell. The closer a point is to the center of the cell being estimated, the more influence, or weight; it has in the averaging process. The weight is a function of inverse distance. The surface being interpolated should be that of a location dependent variable. In kriging, one must model the spatial autocorrelation using a semivariogram instead of assuming a direct, linear relationship with separation distance .
A total of 4423 cases of breast cancer were recorded (2010–2016) from eighteen laboratories distributed in Khartoum State. Patients were aged 12 to 103 years with an average (median) age of 48 years. They were predominately females 97.4% (4300/4413). The mean age at presentation was higher in males (61 years ±14.9) than in females (49 years ±14.2). Of the 4423 cases of breast cancer, invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (NST) was the most frequent histopathological diagnosis (79.5%, 3517/4423) followed by special subtypes of invasive carcinoma (12.4%, 547/4423) and precursor lesions (3.2%, 142/4423) and the remaining 4.9% were classified as others. Females were paying the highest burden with a crude prevalence of 3.9 cases per 100,000 female population, ranging from 0.3 (Gedaref and Western Kordofan) to 22.1 in Khartoum as shown by Table 1 and Fig 2. On the other hand, male breast cancer was <1 per 100,000 male population.
The spatial analysis confirmed that Breast Cancer is a country-wide health problem. The risk of breast cancer according to the map generated using the kriging method of the spatial distribution indicated three gradient scale colors of risk (Fig 3). Risk areas included Western, Central, Southern Darfur and partially Northern states, and a large part of Red Sea; Invasive carcinoma was the predominant type in those States. Intermediate risk areas, a mosaic for invasive carcinoma NST, Special Subtypes of Invasive Carcinoma and Precursor lesions, included the States of Khartoum, Gezira, White Nile, Kassala, Gedaref, Sennar, Eastern Darfur, and focally Northern Darfur. High risk areas were the States of Nile River, Northern, Red Sea (focal), White Nile, Northern and Southern Kordofan.
Our findings revealed a crude prevalence of 3.9 cases per 100,000 female populations for the period 2010 to 2016. This burden in Sudan females was also reported elsewhere in Sub-Saharan African countries, fluctuating from 4.5% (Zimbabwe) to 38.9/100 000 females in (South Africa) . The crude prevalence of male breast cancer was 0.1 cases per 100,000 population which is much lower than figures reported by the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) Program which showed that the rate of male breast cancer in the USA was 1.44 for 100,000 men in 2010 
The average age of our female patients was 49 years revealing that younger population was affected as reported in Central Africa (45.83 years) and Ghana (49.1 years) [22, 23]. On the contrary in developed countries, women are affected at older age respectively at 57 years and 62 years in New Zealand and United States [24, 25]. The possible cause for this early predisposition of breast cancer among Sudanese females is still unknown. However some studies suggested some genetic factors which may contribute to this early onset of the disease [10, 26, 27].
Invasive carcinoma of NST was the prevalent type (79.5%) of breast cancer in our study as previously published in Sudan , elsewhere it was 60% of breast cancer cases as reported by Badowska-Kozakiewicz, et al. .
The Epidemiological map generated per states indicated that the highest prevalence was recorded in Khartoum and Red Sea States with respectively 22.1 and 12.5 per 100,000 female populations. The figures from Khartoum and Red Sea States may be interpreted as related to the fact that most of the cases were reported from those States. However we endorse the contrary based on the results of the modeling method for predicting the risk score, in which the prevalence from these two states in the inverse direct interpolation was weighted with the distance to provide a risk score which balance the prevalence in these two states. As such the spatial distribution predicted Khartoum State as intermediate risk whereas Red Sea State was displayed as a highly focal risk area. In the overall, we would like to emphasis that the breast cancer is a country wide public health problem. The delineated belt is a subject for further discussion related to the modeling technique and the limitations of the data which does not include environmental and socio-economic factors.
This rapid evidence-based delineation of breast cancer areas is a tool for guiding public health professionals and decision makers to establish a breast cancer program for fine tuning the epidemiological map and the subsequent risk map generated as applied in health sector in Iran  and elsewhere in Saudi Arabia  where the geographical information was used to set priorities.
A limitation of data collection was that records and histopathology reports were individually designed by the labs, and as such many labs overlook the inclusion of important socio-demographic and economic data in their records. This can be attributed to a recognizable weakness in the national Health Information Systems (HIS) which also suffers from the fact that large amounts of the community level information are not pooled into the HIS and that some programs collect and use data for their own activities and stop without disseminating their findings; in addition to the limited capacity for analysis, utilization, and dissemination of data and findings within the health system 
Our model was limited by the lack of environmental data to better assess the pattern of breast cancer which is a multi-factorial condition. Unfortunately, due to financial constraints the team was not able to collect the relevant environmental data (data from soil, surface and ground water, air) from high risk areas identified by the study to enable further strengthening of the model. The risk map was developed based on individual location of residence reported by the patients which may be a limiting factor leading to the over estimation or under estimation of the number of cases per State. This potential bias was minimized by the kriging method applied.
Our findings provided an understanding of the pattern of the spatial distribution of breast cancer country wide with hot spots defined as high risk and intermediate risk areas. As further data may be needed to improve the risk map, the decision makers and the health professionals should for equity reasons look at decentralizing of the health system which could not be efficient and operational if all the expertise are concentrated mainly in the State hosting the capital of country.
1. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et.al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011; 378(9801): 1461–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61351-2 21924486
2. World Health Organization. Cancer Fact Sheet 2018. Accessed March 13, 2018. http://www.who.int/cancer/world-cancer-day/2018/en/
3. Bray Freddie, Ferlay Jacques, Soerjomataram Isabelle, Siegel Rebecca L., Torre Lindsey A. and Jemal Ahmedin. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 Available online at cacancerjournal.com. 30207593
4. Lancet The. Breast cancer in developing countries. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10:1077–85. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70230-X
5. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et.al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 31/3/2018.
6. Ghoncheh Mahshid, Pournamdar Zahra, Salehiniya Hamid. Incidence and Mortality and Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in the World. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:43–6.
7. Yalaza Metin, İnan Aydın and Bozer Mikdat. Male Breast Cancer. J Breast Health 2016; 12: 1–8. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2015.2711 28331724
8. Ebrahim Ebrahim M. A., Ghebrehiwot Luam, Abdalgfar Tasneem and Juni Muhammad Hanafiah. Health Care System in Sudan: Review and Analysis of Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threats (SWOT Analysis). Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017; 12(3): 133–50. doi: 10.18502/sjms.v12i3.924
9. Gafer Nahla, Walker Esther, Allah Mohja Khair, and Elbaghir Ali. Cancer Care in Sudan: Current Situation and Challenges. In: Silbermann Michael, editor. Cancer Care in Countries and Societies in Transition, Individualized Care in Focus. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2016.p. 209–17
10. Elamin Amany, Ibrahim Muntaser E., Idris Dafalla Abu, Mohamed Kamal Eldin H. and Mohammed Sulma Ibrahim. Part I: cancer in Sudan—burden, distribution, and trends breast, gynecological, and prostate cancers. Cancer Medicine. 2015; 4(3):447–56. doi: 10.1002/cam4.378 25641872
11. Ali AA, Ibrahim FE. Incidence and geographical distribution of cancer in Radiation and Isotopes Center in Khartoum. Sudan Medical Monitor. 2014; 9(3):109–11.
12. Saeed ME, Cao J, Fadul B, Kadioglu O, Khalid HE, Yassin Z, et al. A Five-year Survey of Cancer Prevalence in Sudan. Anti cancer Res. 2016 Jan; 36(1):279–86.
13. Elhoweris Mohammed. Sudan First International Conference on Breast Cancer 5th-7th December 2011, Khartoum Sudan. Sudan Med J. 2012 April; 48(1).
14. Ageep Ali K., Ali Babikir M., Awadelkarim Mohamed A. Pattern and Incidence of Cancer in Red Sea State, Sudan. Sudan JMS. 2007; 2(2): 115–17.
15. Elgaili Elgaili M, Abuidris Dafalla O, Rahman Munazzah, Michalek Arthur M, Mohammed Sulma I. Breast cancer burden in central Sudan. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2010; 277–82.
16. Saeed Intisar E, Weng Hsin-Yi, Mohamed Kamal H, and Mohammed Sulma I. Cancer incidence in Khartoum, Sudan: first results from the Cancer Registry, 2009–2010. Cancer Med. 2014 Aug; 3(4): 1075–84. doi: 10.1002/cam4.254 24821265
17. Setting up a radiotherapy programme: clinical, medical physics, radiation protection and safety aspects.—Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2008. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/pub1296_web.pdf.
19. Sinna Hans-Peter and Kreipe Hans. A Brief Overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors, 4th Edition, Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition. Breast Care. 2013; 8:149–54. doi: 10.1159/000350774 24415964
20. ESRI. How Kriging works. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/3d-analyst-toolbox/how-kriging-works.htm.
21. Grover Surbhi, Martei Yehoda M., Puri Priya, Prabhakar Pooja, Mutebi Miriam, Balogun Onyinye D., et.al. Breast cancer and HIV in SSA: a complex relationship. J Glob Oncol. 2017.
22. Balekouzou Augustin, Yin Ping, Pamatika Christian Maucler, Bishwajit Ghose, Nambei Sylvain Wilfrid, Djeintote Marceline, et al. Epidemiology of breast cancer: retrospective study in the Central African Republic. BMC Public Health. 2016. 16: 1230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3863-6 27923361
23. Ohene-Yeboah M and Adjei E. Breast Cancer in Kumasi, Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal. 2012; 46(1):8–13. 22605883
24. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. Bethesda, MD Accessed on March 22 2018., http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/, 2017.
25. Seneviratne S, Lawrenson R, Harvey V, Ramsaroop R, Elwood M, Scott N, et.al. Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in New Zealand: impacts of socio-demographic factors, breast cancer screening and biology. BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 19;16:129. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2177-5 26896237
26. Elnour Ahmed M, Elderdery Abozer Y, Mills Jeremy, Mohammed Babiker A, Abdelaal Daw Elbiet, Mohamed Abdelraheem Osman, et.al. BRCA 1 & 2 mutations in Sudanese secondary school girls with known breast cancer in their families. International Journal of Health Sciences, Qassim University. 2012; 6(1): 63–71
27. Khalid Dafaallah Awadelkarim. Studies on the Genetics and the Pathology of Breast Cancer in the Sudan. PhD. Thesis, “G. d’Annunzio” University. 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256296953_Studies_on_the_Genetics_and_the_Pathology_of_Breast_Cancer_in_the_Sudan.
28. Badowska-Kozakiewicz Anna M., Liszcz Anna, Sobol Maria, and Patera Janusz. Retrospective Evaluation of Histopathological Examinations in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer of No Special Type: An Analysis of 691 Patients. Archives of Medical Science. 2017; 13(6): 1408–15. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53964 29181072
29. Mahdavifar N, Pakzad R, Ghoncheh M, Pakzad I, Moudi A, Salehiniya H. The Spatial Analysis of Breast Cancer Incidence in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17, Cancer Control in Western Asia Special Issue: 59–64. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.s3.59 27165209
30. Bhunia Gouri Sankar, Shit Pravat Kumar, Maiti Ramkrishna. Comparison of GIS-based interpolation methods for spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.02.001.